Title: Nothing is fair about the Trump Indictments. June 12, 2023
by Michael Charles Master (author of Trump the Disrupter at amazon.com)
Are you listening to the mainstream media about the 37 counts by Smith to indict Trump? Are you losing some faith in Trump? Are you growing some animosity towards Trump?
Well, that is exactly what the bad guys want you to do. They used the same strategy about the Russia hoax, about the 2 impeachments, about COVID, about Jan 6 false accusations, about the Steele dossier, about Comey false claims, about Trump asking for an investigation about the Bidens and Burisma. It is all meant to cause you to lose faith in Trump and MAGA.
87% of Republicans think that all the indictments and court cases against Trump are politically motivated (Fox News poll). In fact, the Trump lead increased by 3 points in the primary polls over last weekend after the indictment. Why?
If you stole 2 pieces of candy at the same time from a candy store as a child, would that be one crime or 2? Well, this indictment of Trump has 37 listed supposed crimes. Many of those listed supposed crimes are obtained by dividing the supposed criminal activities into multiple crimes.
As stated by Smith, the prosecutor, he de-bundled the crimes for maximum charges and maximum penalties. Some accusations are considered individual crimes just as considering stealing those 2 pieces of candy as 2 crimes.
It is obvious that the prosecution is betting that a jury will find at least one conviction out of 37 accusations. It is the same strategy that Bragg is using in NY with his 33 accusations. Is that fair? Does that treat the same actions by others the same? of course not. But when you look at the 2 impeachments and the Jan 6 Committee, and the media bias during COVID, Americans have come to accept that Democrats are not fair. To Democrats, the end justifies the means and now their end game is to stop Trump and the MAGA movement.... by any means.
All of the cases against Trump are being pursued by Democrat AGs, DAs, DoJ, and FBI. All of them. Democrats are using the judicial system as a political weapon. Is that fair? Have Democrats just made it OK for Republican AGs, DAs, etc to do the same to Democrat leaders? Then what? Where does it all lead?
So the prosecutor alleges that Trump lawyers testified that Trump told them to take some documents off-site to remove damaging documents. That is the government's, Smith's, RICO accusation against Trump.
Think about that for a moment. According to Smith, Trump lawyers informed against Trump.
If true, what happened to attorney/client privilege? What? Only the client can waive it. So how did any such lawyers for Trump make such a statement? And if Trump actually made such a comment, but the lawyers advised him against it and the action never happened, then where is the crime? Since when does a conversation about alternatives with your lawyers become a crime?
RICO is clear. A criminal action must occur, then those who were part of planning such an action are at risk for RICO. If no criminal action, then no RICO. If the Trump lawyers did not take documents off-site to destroy them, then where is the crime that justifies RICO?
Smith de-bundled the items to get 37 indictments in hopes that at least one would stick with a jury. And made accusations like this RICO accusation that are blatantly false. He is throwing as much as possible against the wall to get something to stick. What if that happened to you? Is that fair? Or is that an abuse of the legal process?
Let's discuss fair for a moment. According to the dictionary, "fair" is marked by impartiality and honesty : free from self-interest, prejudice, or favoritism. Treating each same situation the same, each person the same.
So what happened to Hillary Clinton when she had her lawyers destroy evidence (RICO to delete emails, destroy cell phones, and bit clean servers), when she had classified documents on her personal server, when she lied to the FBI? What happened to Biden for having hundreds of classified documents that he stole as a senator in multiple unsecured locations for more than 20 years? Or to Sandy Berger for stealing classified documents and destroying them on behalf of the Clintons? Or to Bill Clinton? What happened to Joe Biden for his actions with Ukraine/Burisma when he was VP? Are these attacks against Trump fair when compared to how the same actions by Democrats were treated?
James Comey overstepped his authority when he refused to provide the evidence concerning Hillary Clinton to the government prosecutors. He claimed no prosecutor would bring charges against Clinton, but refused to give those government prosecutors the evidence so they could make the decision. His logic was that Clinton did not have criminal "intent." So in all "fairness," what is the criminal intent that Smith has on Trump? Was Trump providing USA secrets to our enemies as per the requirements of the Espionage Act that Smith is using? Comey established: If no criminal intent, then no crime. So that should also apply to Trump. That is only "fair."
BTW: that is the same James Comey who used the false Steele dossier to justify the FISA warrants to spy on the Trump campaign and then lied that the FBI was not spying. Instead, the complicit media condemned (as usual) Trump for calling out Comey and the FBI for the spying.
Trump support continues because MAGA believers did not fall prey to the deep state/Democrat/establishment strategy to stop Trump and the MAGA movement. Yes, the bad guys will eventually find something to convict Trump of something/anything. They can do that to anyone, at any time, including to you. But that does not make Trump wrong about how to make America great again.... and that is really what the bad guys are trying to kill.
Fair Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/faira. : marked by impartiality and honesty : free from self-interest, prejudice, or favoritism. Treating each same situation the same, each person the same.