CNN's Ratings Hit Rock Bottom as Fake News Network Refuses to Acknowledge Bombshell Durham Report that Proves They've Been Lying....
May 18, 2023 10:01:29 #
BBZ wrote:
The Durham bombshell report was a dud. Nothing new, except criticism of the FBI and how it obtained warrants. It reported the same information Robert Mueller's investigation found which did not exonerate Trump. There was enough evidence to charge Trump, but Barr declined because Trump was the President. If anything, Durham's report should have recommended criminal charges against Donald Trump.
So much spent on legal by both patriots of Trump and the DOJ.May 18, 2023 10:04:45 #
Liberty Tree wrote:
No one believes that except people like you who would never admit the truth no matter the evidence.
No one? Most. Trump supporters are not the majority. They are a minority.
May 18, 2023 10:05:58 #
JFlorio wrote:
Read the report dum***. Never mind. Have someone read it to you.
Wow, you are maturing in small steps. You still insult, but now not using profanity. I do not need to read the report.
The only conviction was a mid-level FBI lawyer who pleaded guilty to altering an e-mail used in one of the FISA applications used to authorize surveillance against campaign adviser Carter Page. This is not a block buster.
May 18, 2023 10:11:39 #
Liberty Tree wrote:
No one believes that except people like you who would never admit the truth no matter the evidence.
It is a matter of fact in black an white. Public record. Just because you don’t like to hear the facts doesn’t negate fact.
May 18, 2023 10:17:28 #
Kevyn wrote:
It is a matter of fact in black an white. Public record. Just because you don’t like to hear the facts doesn’t negate fact.
Kevyn, you under estimate the power of denial. Fact are irrelevant. Need proof, just ask a flat earthier. Same mentality. In denial of reality.
May 18, 2023 10:21:00 #
BBZ wrote:
The Durham bombshell report was a dud. Nothing new, except criticism of the FBI and how it obtained warrants. It reported the same information Robert Mueller's investigation found which did not exonerate Trump. There was enough evidence to charge Trump, but Barr declined because Trump was the President. If anything, Durham's report should have recommended criminal charges against Donald Trump.
👍🏼
May 18, 2023 10:37:12 #
JFlorio
Loc: Seminole Florida
BBZ wrote:
Wow, you are maturing in small steps. You still insult, but now not using profanity. I do not need to read the report.
The only conviction was a mid-level FBI lawyer who pleaded guilty to altering an e-mail used in one of the FISA applications used to authorize surveillance against campaign adviser Carter Page. This is not a block buster.
The only conviction was a mid-level FBI lawyer who pleaded guilty to altering an e-mail used in one of the FISA applications used to authorize surveillance against campaign adviser Carter Page. This is not a block buster.
Like I said, read the report. CNN didn't give you the entire story.
May 18, 2023 11:26:27 #
RascalRiley wrote:
Plenty of facts.
In your mind. As I pointed out, your link requires subscription.
May 18, 2023 13:55:05 #
Liberty Tree wrote:
No one believes that except people like you who would never admit the truth no matter the evidence.
Oh, some people believe that—the loons who were hoping and praying his report would be the bombshell that would bring down many in the gov’t.
May 19, 2023 09:39:03 #
jimpack123
Loc: wisconsin
JFlorio wrote:
Read the report dum***. Never mind. Have someone read it to you.
Read it NWR
May 19, 2023 11:10:38 #
May 19, 2023 14:45:02 #
May 19, 2023 15:41:48 #
May 19, 2023 15:55:14 #
Liberty Tree wrote:
Same Democrat spin we hear everywhere
Johnthan Turley: Now we See Why Democrats Tried to Shut Down the Durham Investigation
https://www.realclearpoliticas.com/video/2021/11/05
This is extremely significant. First of all, we have gotten a glimpse at what Durham has, and it is new. This is the type of stuff that didn't appear in the Mueller report, which is a very good question as to why. It is clear the FBI knew very early on that the Steele dossier was based on unreliable information. They were told by his primary source, Danchenko, that this was all unsubstantiated that he barely recognized what Steele reported. But we also have, as Radcliffe just said more information coming out since the Mueller report including that President Obama was briefed that Hillary Clinton and her campaign was planning to create a narrative that Trump was in collusion with Russia. This is the aftermath of her e-mail scandal.
So we're seeing different layers of connection with the Clinton campaign.
I've written two dozen articles on Durham because for the last two years people like myself have been pummeled for saying Durham seems to be on to something. Each indictment showed information never before disclosed after multiple years.
Keep in mind Democrat leaders tried to shut down the Durham investigation. I can now see why. This is very damaging. It is also unsettling to see the degree to which the Clinton campaign not only funded, which they denied during the campaign, but ultimately had those key figures actually come up with some of these false allegations.
Of course the corrupt/power hungry leadership of the Democrat/Communist Party/useful idiot faction HAVE to claim "it was in the Mueller report"...it wasn't/"it's old news"/"it doesn't matter any more". And to the left/Democrat/Communist Party; corruption/abuse of power is their every-day way of doing everything
May 20, 2023 09:36:47 #
jimpack123
Loc: wisconsin
Ricktloml wrote:
Johnthan Turley: Now we See Why Democrats Tried t... (show quote)
FAKE NEWS, but the real news will be Biden winning reelection in Nov. of 2024 and Newson winning the White House in 2028
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.