One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Why would Anybody Embrace Fascism ?
Page <<first <prev 18 of 22 next> last>>
Feb 28, 2023 16:39:56   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
RandyBrian wrote:
No, political conservatism is NOT about preserving tradition, anymore than political liberalism is about trying new ideas.
You are apparently trying to define political parties by the dictionary meaning of their labels. Foolish, at the least.

Yeah, what was I thinking? Dictionaries are such liars. LOL

RandyBrian wrote:

Conservatives, as in politics, are about preserving what works (solving a problem or continuing a process that is good for Americans) until something provably better is proposed.

LOL - That's just a more palatable way of saying the same thing. Traditions get established because they DO work. The problem is that when a nation expands to include more diversity the traditions that work for some don't always work for others. You are showing yourself to be a rather narrow minded fella who isn't even considering the people with different interests or needs than your own.

RandyBrian wrote:

It is about supporting the Constitution AS WRITTEN, and changing it ONLY through the Amendment process.

Well, that's just being a constitutional republic. Liberals are just as compliant with that process as conservatives are.

RandyBrian wrote:

It is about politicians and judges that hold to their oaths to support and defend that self same Constitution, and abide by the laws of the country.

Again, nothing distinguishing here. This is just how a constitutional republic works.

RandyBrian wrote:

It is about holding the government, Federal State and Local, all to the standards set by our Founders, putting the AMERICAN people FIRST, and maximizing their freedoms compatible with a functional and just society.

Well that sounds very eloquent 'n-all but it's flawed. First of all, the standards set by our founders, which is basically the U.S Constitution, is designed to be changed. That's what the amendment process is for. They apparently had a better grip than you do on the reality of a changing world. Secondly, they never said anything about putting the AMERICAN people first. That just wasn't something they even considered. What they put first, were limitations on government which is what a constitution is and that's as far as they went. The freedom they referred to was simply the result of the limits they placed on government and nothing more.

RandyBrian wrote:

That means, for you on the left, that We The People come first.....

Putting the people first is the very essence of the left, so we don't even need the founders to tell us that. In fact, the founders were themselves, republicans (not Republicans as in the party, but republicans, as in opposition to monarchy) which after the French Revolution a few years later, was described world-wide as the political left.

RandyBrian wrote:

not our chosen party, not our political servants be they a president, senator, or congressperson. Not immigrants and not criminals. And not POC or women or gays or transgenders OVER and ABOVE any other citizens.

Yeah, the founders didn't say any of that.

RandyBrian wrote:

The government or it's politicians or bureaucrats should NOT be trying to fix or adjust society.

Oops! I guess we've been violating their wishes for about 250 years. LOL. Let me ask you something... If we're not supposed to fix or adjust society WTF is an amendment for?

RandyBrian wrote:

It should ALWAYS be acting without prejudice for or against ANYone. Period.

Maybe one day we'll get there. So far it hasn't happened.

Reply
Feb 28, 2023 17:12:44   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
eagleye13 wrote:
Must you spew Bolshevic BS, Milosia2?

I believe the term is Bolshevik... Before you accuse people of something you should at least know how to spell it, don't you think?

eagleye13 wrote:

It doesn't hold water.
You will never cancel this Constitutional Republic.

Why would anyone want to do that? Especially someone who advocates socialist principals? The best place for any form of democratic socialism is in fact a constitutional republic.

eagleye13 wrote:

BTW; communism is always a loser for those ruled by it; except for party members.
What is in it for you?

I don't recall anything Milosia ever said that would indicate she's a communist. Do you even know what a communist is? I doubt you do. According to what Marx wrote, communism hasn't really happened yet although some close approximations exist in places like Israel. The so-called communist revolutions in Russia and China were according to what Marx prescribed, premature because neither of those countries had developed capitalism yet and that's the first prerequisite... socialism being the second. Those countries tried to jump from agrarian feudalism to communism in one revolution. Marx would have been rolling his eyes.

What made life miserable in those countries was basic tyranny, not the "communism" that never happened. The Soviets did implement some socialism but the quality sucked compared to the socialism in America.

You've been played my friend. The oligarchy that runs this country wants to keep you down and you're letting them do it. Other people like Milosia are trying to fight back and you're basically telling them not to.

Reply
Feb 28, 2023 18:22:45   #
Rose42
 
straightUp wrote:
….
You've been played my friend. The oligarchy that runs this country wants to keep you down and you're letting them do it. Other people like Milosia are trying to fight back and you're basically telling them not to.


You’ve been played as well. . The oligarchy running this country doesn’t care about party. Milosia isn’t fighting back - she’s playing their game with her often silly hyper partisan blather. That accomplishes nothing.

Reply
 
 
Feb 28, 2023 18:54:29   #
Big Kahuna
 
straightUp wrote:
Maybe one day we'll get there. So far it hasn't happened.


Why are you trying to whitewash Randy Bryan's needs and wants. He has a right to hold those close to himself too. Maybe you need to be more accepting of him.

Reply
Feb 28, 2023 18:56:46   #
Big Kahuna
 
Rose42 wrote:
You’ve been played as well. . The oligarchy running this country doesn’t care about party. Milosia isn’t fighting back - she’s playing their game with her often silly hyper partisan blather. That accomplishes nothing.


Do you think Milktoastia and Straight up have an incestuous relationship going on like Omar and her brother did??

Reply
Feb 28, 2023 18:59:41   #
Big Kahuna
 
straightUp wrote:
I don't recall anything Milosia ever said that would indicate she's a communist. Do you even know what a communist is? I doubt you do. According to what Marx wrote, communism hasn't really happened yet although some close approximations exist in places like Israel. The so-called communist revolutions in Russia and China were according to what Marx prescribed, premature because neither of those countries had developed capitalism yet and that's the first prerequisite... socialism being the second. Those countries tried to jump from agrarian feudalism to communism in one revolution. Marx would have been rolling his eyes.

What made life miserable in those countries was basic tyranny, not the "communism" that never happened. The Soviets did implement some socialism but the quality sucked compared to the socialism in America.

You've been played my friend. The oligarchy that runs this country wants to keep you down and you're letting them do it. Other people like Milosia are trying to fight back and you're basically telling them not to.
I don't recall anything Milosia ever said that wou... (show quote)


Pure communism will never happen just as the demorat fantasy of a utopia on Earth will never happen. Mankind is too sinful, like communist ideology, for total goodness to prevail and that certainly includes you.

Reply
Feb 28, 2023 19:03:47   #
Big Kahuna
 
straightUp wrote:
LOL "bald face"? I think the term you're looking for is "bold faced"... As in... bold faced

In any case, the joke appears to be on you for not being able to tell the difference between political parties and ideological cultures.
It's like you're saying a ham sandwich and a turkey sandwich is the same thing because all you can see is the bread.


So Right wing demorats were much like the Fascist Demorats of today. I get it now.

Reply
 
 
Feb 28, 2023 22:33:27   #
BIRDMAN
 
Milosia2 wrote:
It will not survive without democracy .



Reply
Mar 1, 2023 07:19:15   #
Ricktloml
 
Big Kahuna wrote:
So Right wing demorats were much like the Fascist Demorats of today. I get it now.




It is amazing the lengths leftists will go to cover-up/blame THEIR words/actions on someone/something else...their ugly/racist past/their support for Hitler/left-wing ideologies that have destroyed society after society

Reply
Mar 1, 2023 08:38:51   #
microphor Loc: Home is TN
 
straightUp wrote:
Bernie is a pain in the ass for the neoliberals because unlike Trump who was limited to harmless trash-talking, Bernie is suggesting policies that actually put priority on the people, rather than the high-roller market players as the neoliberals do.

Bernie is the real "America First" champion. Trump is a fake.

The saddest thing about all this is how so many Americans, including every last Republican has been fooled into disarming themselves politically. The most powerful weapon available to free people, aside from education is democratic socialism. The plutocratic oligarchy that you were calling "a minority of rich people" know this and through a constant impedance to education and a barrage of fictional slippery-slope horror stories, they managed to convince millions of Americans that socialism will lead to communism and then to a land of gulags and misery.

It's like telling an army that they their guns will turn them into ducks if they don't don't drop them immediately.
Bernie is a pain in the ass for the neoliberals be... (show quote)


ahahahahahaha, You guys crack me up! Sounds like y'all been looking in the mirror again and don't even know it.

Reply
Mar 1, 2023 09:02:53   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
Rose42 wrote:
You’ve been played as well. .

As a democracy, we're ALL being played Rose... The difference is that some of us are learning to recognize it,

Rose42 wrote:

The oligarchy running this country doesn’t care about party.

Yes, they do... political parties make it convenient to manipulate the people by focusing on their representatives. That's how lobbying works.

Rose42 wrote:

Milosia isn’t fighting back - she’s playing their game with her often silly hyper partisan blather. That accomplishes nothing.

Well, not HERE she isn't. Clearly, arguing with people like you isn't going to accomplish anything of political value, but if she's anything like me, she could very well be making a difference elsewhere. You just don't know.

Reply
 
 
Mar 1, 2023 09:49:49   #
Big Kahuna
 
straightUp wrote:
Well, not HERE she isn't. Clearly, arguing with people like you isn't going to accomplish anything of political value, but if she's anything like me, she could very well be making a difference elsewhere. You just don't know.


Thanks for showing us the difference between good and evil. Your evil has been exposed. Now go fall off your surfboard prop.

Reply
Mar 1, 2023 10:03:33   #
Rose42
 
straightUp wrote:
Well, not HERE she isn't. Clearly, arguing with people like you isn't going to accomplish anything of political value, but if she's anything like me, she could very well be making a difference elsewhere. You just don't know.


When someone uses dishonesty and hyperbole as milosia does they are counterproductive. Zealotry accomplishes nothing. You have no idea what she does either just as no one knows what you do. You might be making a difference somewhere who knows

No the oligarchs don’t care about parties except to distract people into meaningless squabbles while they work towards what they want.

Reply
Mar 1, 2023 10:15:19   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
Big Kahuna wrote:
Why are you trying to whitewash Randy Bryan's needs and wants. He has a right to hold those close to himself too. Maybe you need to be more accepting of him.

I'm not disputing his right to his opinions, if that's what you're suggesting. I'm just disputing his argument. Do you have a problem with that?

Big Kahuna wrote:
Pure communism will never happen just as the demorat fantasy of a utopia on Earth will never happen. Mankind is too sinful, like communist ideology, for total goodness to prevail and that certainly includes you.

Look, you folks are the ONLY people even mentioning communism. Show me one example where a liberal advocates communism. There isn't any. Show me one example where a conservative argues against communism... Hundreds! Basically it's a giant straw man. You set up "sinful communism" as if it's our argument, which it isn't, and then you attack it. It's like your shadow boxing.

Speaking for myself, I'm not concerned about America being overrun by communism because I KNOW it won't work. If other liberals think the way I do it might actually explain why you NEVER see liberals advocating communism as much as you want that to be the case.

Likewise, none of us are actually trying to achieve utopia on Earth either. Our objectives are actually very much down to earth. We can SEE where other countries are doing far better than us in MANY categories, so we have living examples to follow. The problem we face is that a lot of the improvements we DO advocate would force the oligarchs to compromise with the people and they don't want to do that. In places like Europe the power of the people is stronger so they tend to achieve more concessions from their oligarchs, such as free education and healthcare. But in America, the power of the people is deeply compromised by a class of very submissive conservatives, easily convinced that we owe our lives to the oligarchs and that any attempt to gain concession from them is a call for communism.

Reply
Mar 1, 2023 10:41:46   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
Rose42 wrote:
When someone uses dishonesty and hyperbole as milosia does they are counterproductive. Zealotry accomplishes nothing.

Well, I haven't seen milosia being dishonest or hyperbolic but I don't read EVERYTHING she writes either. As for zealotry, I think it DOES accomplish a LOT. Dishonesty, hyperbole and zealotry drove the attack on our capitol on 1/6. It just depends on what you're trying to accomplish.

Rose42 wrote:

You have no idea what she does either just as no one knows what you do. You might be making a difference somewhere who knows

Not sure what your point is... I never claimed to know what Milosia does outside of 1PP.

Rose42 wrote:

No the oligarchs don’t care about parties except to distract people into meaningless squabbles while they work towards what they want.

Well... isn't that making use of the parties?

Reply
Page <<first <prev 18 of 22 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.