RandyBrian wrote:
No, political conservatism is NOT about preserving tradition, anymore than political liberalism is about trying new ideas.
You are apparently trying to define political parties by the dictionary meaning of their labels. Foolish, at the least.
Yeah, what was I thinking? Dictionaries are such liars. LOL
RandyBrian wrote:
Conservatives, as in politics, are about preserving what works (solving a problem or continuing a process that is good for Americans) until something provably better is proposed.
LOL - That's just a more palatable way of saying the same thing. Traditions get established because they DO work. The problem is that when a nation expands to include more diversity the traditions that work for some don't always work for others. You are showing yourself to be a rather narrow minded fella who isn't even considering the people with different interests or needs than your own.
RandyBrian wrote:
It is about supporting the Constitution AS WRITTEN, and changing it ONLY through the Amendment process.
Well, that's just being a constitutional republic. Liberals are just as compliant with that process as conservatives are.
RandyBrian wrote:
It is about politicians and judges that hold to their oaths to support and defend that self same Constitution, and abide by the laws of the country.
Again, nothing distinguishing here. This is just how a constitutional republic works.
RandyBrian wrote:
It is about holding the government, Federal State and Local, all to the standards set by our Founders, putting the AMERICAN people FIRST, and maximizing their freedoms compatible with a functional and just society.
Well that sounds very eloquent 'n-all but it's flawed. First of all, the standards set by our founders, which is basically the U.S Constitution, is designed to be changed. That's what the amendment process is for. They apparently had a better grip than you do on the reality of a changing world. Secondly, they never said anything about putting the AMERICAN people first. That just wasn't something they even considered. What they put first, were limitations on government which is what a constitution is and that's as far as they went. The freedom they referred to was simply the result of the limits they placed on government and nothing more.
RandyBrian wrote:
That means, for you on the left, that We The People come first.....
Putting the people first is the very essence of the left, so we don't even need the founders to tell us that. In fact, the founders were themselves, republicans (not Republicans as in the party, but republicans, as in opposition to monarchy) which after the French Revolution a few years later, was described world-wide as the political left.
RandyBrian wrote:
not our chosen party, not our political servants be they a president, senator, or congressperson. Not immigrants and not criminals. And not POC or women or gays or transgenders OVER and ABOVE any other citizens.
Yeah, the founders didn't say any of that.
RandyBrian wrote:
The government or it's politicians or bureaucrats should NOT be trying to fix or adjust society.
Oops! I guess we've been violating their wishes for about 250 years. LOL. Let me ask you something... If we're not supposed to fix or adjust society WTF is an amendment for?
RandyBrian wrote:
It should ALWAYS be acting without prejudice for or against ANYone. Period.
Maybe one day we'll get there. So far it hasn't happened.