Radiance3 wrote:
======================
That was what I have been telling you that Jesus came from Juda. And I wrote the scriptures explaining why.
I showed the Levi descendants to let you know that Jesus did NOT descend from Levi but from the Tribe of Juda. God had purposely selected Juda as the ancestor of Jesus. And I the scriptures had proven it right. I wrote that there in detail.
What subject did I change? I never change my position. I have been consistent all the way. I said, since the beginning I will not change my position and stand for the fact that Jesus came from Juda.
That presentation of LEVI ancestry was presented to prove to you that your assertion that Jesus came from LEVI was wrong.
Jesus came from Juda as I has given you yesterday all the generations where JESUS came from the beginning up to his birth.
You insisted earlier claimed that Jesus was an Israelite, and came from Levi. Now, you are turning it around and reverse your story.
Dear Lord: I have the synopsis ahead of this , all what I have written explaining that Jesus came from Juda. Please go back and read all of them!. They were all written.
Please don't turn around when you are caught wrong. Thank you. We should be honest about this. We are talking about the word of God. Please accept when you are wrong. I won't count that against you, cause no one is perfect.
-------------------------------------------------------
Here is the statement coming from your writing yesterday, stating that Jesus was an Israelite, a direct descendant of Levi. This was copied from your report. Go back and check it.
From Ginny: Quote} The fact that modern day Jews want us to think they are descended from Israelites is one of the greatest intentional lies, or misunderstandings, in all of history. Jesus was an Israelite. He was a direct descendant of Levi through Aaron.1 Levi was a son of Jacob.
Ginny, you also wrote this: Excerpt:
Why then, does everyone say that Jesus was a Jew? Most people think that Jesus was a Jew, but Jesus was an Israelite, not a Jew. Israelites were the ones who were called the chosen people of God.5 Edomites, and their descendants, now called Jews, are not the chosen people. The fact that modern day Jews want us to think they are descended from Israelites is one of the greatest intentional lies, or misunderstandings, in all of history. Jesus was an Israelite.
====================== br i b That was what I h... (
show quote)
So, what you're saying is that Judah was a Jew? That's not possible!
I didn't say Jesus was a descendant of Levi's - that was a quote from the website.
https://highlanderjuan.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Benjamin-H-Freedman-Speech-at-the-Willard-Hotel-1961.pdfexcerpt:
In 1345, a man by the name of Wycliffe in England thought that it was time to translate the Bible into English. There was no English edition of the Bible because who the Devil could read? It was only the educated church people who could read Latin and Greek, Syriac, Aramaic and the other languages. Anyhow, Wycliffe translated the Bible into English. But in it, he had to look around for some words for Judaeas and Judaius.
There was no English word because Judea had passed out of existence. There was no Judea. People had long ago forgotten that.
So in the first translation he used the word, in referring to Jesus, as 'gyu', "jew". At the time, there was no printing press.
Then, between 1345 and the 17th century, when the press came into use, that word passed through so many changes... I have them all here. If you want I can read them to you. I will. That word 'gyu' which was in the Wycliffe Bible became...first it was 'gyu', then 'giu', then 'iu'(because the 'i' in Latin is pronounced like the ' j '.Julius Caesar is ' Iul ' because there is no 'j' in Latin) then ' iuw ', then 'ieuu', then 'ieuy', then 'iwe', then' iow', then 'iewe',all in Bibles as time went on. Then' ieue ', then ' iue ', then ' ive ', and then ' ivw ',
and finally in the 18th century... ' jew '. Jew.All the corrupt and contracted forms for Judaius, and Judaeas in Latin. Now, there was no such thing as 'Jew', and any theologian -- I've lectured in maybe 20 of the most prominent theological seminaries in this country, and two in Europe --
there was no such word as Jew. There only was Judea, and Jesus was a Judean and the first English use of a word in an English bible to describe him was 'gyu' -- Jew. A contracted and shortened form of Judaeus, just the same as we call a laboratory a 'lab', and gasoline 'gas'... a tendency to short up.
So, in England there were no public schools; people didn't know how to read; it looked like a scrambled alphabet so they made a short word out of it. Now for a theologian to say that you can't harm the Jews, is just ridiculous. I'd like to know where in the scriptures it says that. I'd like to know the text.
Look at what happened to Germany for touching Jews. What would you, as a citizen of the United States, do to people who did to you what the so-called Jews -- the Pollacks and Litvaks and Litzianers - - they weren't Jews, as I just explained to you. They were Eastern Europeans who'd been converted to Talmudism. There was no such thing as Judaism. Judaism was a name given in recent years to this religion known in Bible history as Torah [inaudible].
No Jew or no educated person ever heard of Judaism. It didn't exist. They pulled it out of the air. . . a meaningless word.Just like 'anti-Semitic'.
The Arab is a Semite. And the Christians talk about people who don't like Jews as anti-Semites, and they call all the Arabs anti-Semites. The only Semites in the world are the Arabs. There isn't one Jew who's a Semite. They're all Turkothean Mongoloids. The Eastern european Jews. So, they brainwashed the public, and if you will invite me to meet this reverend who told you these things, I'll convince him and it'll be one step in the right direction. I'll go wherever I have to go to meet him.