Investigations versus reality: Do not expect the mccarthy magas to investigate any maga crime, starting with trump and going down to santos...

American Scene

Do not expect the mccarthy magas to investigate any maga crime, starting with trump and going down to santos

RandyBrian Loc: Texas

Rinaldi wrote:

Do not expect the mccarthy magas to investigate any maga crime, staring with trump and going down to santos

That's because all of those have already been done for the last six years. Not a single investigation into a single Democrat government action or official (or their sons), but a concerted effort on the part of weaponized agencies to cover up for them.

son of witless

Rinaldi wrote:

Do not expect the mccarthy magas to investigate any maga crime, staring with trump and going down to santos

Your guys took care of all that.

Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio

RandyBrian wrote:

That's because all of those have already been done for the last six years. Not a single investigation into a single Democrat government action or official (or their sons), but a concerted effort on the part of weaponized agencies to cover up for them.

The Dems just don’t have the time.
There are no Weaponized agencies.
Law and Order means enforcing law and order. It’s not Weaponized , like Jesus these days.

RandyBrian Loc: Texas

Milosia2 wrote:

The Dems just don’t have the time.
There are no Weaponized agencies.
Law and Order means enforcing law and order. It’s not Weaponized , like Jesus these days.

You are right. Except, of course, for the CIA, FBI, DOJ, IRS, the State Department, Homeland security, and the Military.
You don't like the word 'weaponized"? Okay. I'll use the long form. Each of the above federal agencies, plus others, have been politicized and authorized and instructed to persecute by ANY quasi-legal or arguably legal means any person, organization, or group that the Democrats deem to be in less then full agreement with any of their policies, or in any way is deemed to be a potential threat to any of their leadership or family.
I hope you like that better. Personally, I think the word 'weaponized' gets the point across just fine.

vernon

Rinaldi wrote:

Do not expect the mccarthy magas to investigate any maga crime, starting with trump and going down to santos

Hell, they have can't. there is nothing left to investigate . maybe they are going to investigate his crotch for strange hairs.

Smedley_buzkill

Milosia2 wrote:

The Dems just don’t have the time.
There are no Weaponized agencies.
Law and Order means enforcing law and order. It’s not Weaponized , like Jesus these days.

Nice to know that Eric Swalwell, who serves on the intelligence committee was boinking a Chinese spy and she did it out of the love and respect she felt for this shitweasel. Then there's Sam Brinton, the ladies' luggage thief. Fauci did not save lives. Diane Feinstein was never held accountable for employing a Chinese spy for years. Let's not forget James Comey, who, after making several million dollars off of the Clinton Foundation before becoming head of the FBI, refused to prosecute Hillary the Harpy after listing crimes that a number of people not named Clinton were serving time in prison for. I don't hear any calls for Biden to be prosecuted for squirrelling away documents which he had absolutely no authority to do.
I will never again state that a leftist leg humper cannot sink any lower or act more stupidly because they take it as a double dog dare.

Smedley_buzkill

RandyBrian wrote:

You are right. Except, of course, for the CIA, FB... (show quote)

Glad to see a fellow fan of succinct communication.

Ronald Hatt Loc: Lansing, Mich

Rinaldi wrote:

Do not expect the mccarthy magas to investigate any maga crime, starting with trump and going down to santos

As usual, you are bereft of common sense, & logic.

why is it...{ EXACTLY ]...that you "hate" Trump?

Most "HATE TRUMPERS"...are very unhappy people, low IQ, & have no clue of politics!...[ NO?}

Then why do you elect people like *Slick Perverted Willie, & try to get "Killery"into office? Why *Obama, unqualified, & inept, racist supreme, White hater? [ community organizer, that tried to jam the "FUNDAMENTAL CHANGE" debacle down the throats of Americans? [ How do you like "FUNDAMENTAL CHANGE NOW? ]

& IF THAT'S ALL NOT BAD ENOUGH...You elect Joseph "demented", corrupt, inept... Biden to run this country?

How did you like his *El Paso trip?

How did you like his *Mexico trip

How do you like him Now?

vernon

Rinaldi wrote:

Do not expect the mccarthy magas to investigate any maga crime, starting with trump and going down to santos

Like what crimes are you hinting at?

Justice101

Rinaldi wrote:

Do not expect the mccarthy magas to investigate any maga crime, starting with trump and going down to santos

Jim Jordan is supposed to release the 14 hours of video pertaining to the January 6 riot. We'll find out more about the FBI's involvements as well as other non-MAGA provocateurs.

Why should Santos be investigated a/o removed? You know darn well that Nasty Nancy Pelosi wouldn't remove him if he was an elected Democrat. He could be referred to the ethics committee to find if he broke any financial laws prior to his candidacy. Though we should be electing honest people as our reps and senators, telling people to resign because they lied about their background would mean that Lizzy Warren and Richard Blumenthal should resign as well.

RandyBrian Loc: Texas

Smedley_buzkill wrote:

Glad to see a fellow fan of succinct communication.

RandyBrian Loc: Texas

Justice101 wrote:

Jim Jordan is supposed to release the 14 hours of ... (show quote)

Biden.....not 'too', or 'as well', but ESPECIALLY!!! He has verafiably and provably lied dozens of times going back from his early days all the way through 2022. His lying about his past is so prolific, I have no doubts he has already done so in 2023, though I can not prove it.

America 1 Loc: South Miami

vernon wrote:

Hell, they can't. there is nothing left to investigate. maybe they are going to investigate his crotch for strange hairs.

They love to crotch sniff.
And sniff and group little girls.

Justice101

RandyBrian wrote:

Biden.....not 'too', or 'as well', but ESPECIALLY!!! He has verafiably and provably lied dozens of times going back from his early days all the way through 2022. His lying about his past is so prolific, I have no doubts he has already done so in 2023, though I can not prove it.

Biden is a classical pathological liar. No "ifs, ands or buts" about it. He wasn't nominated when he ran twice before. The first time he was accused of plagiarizing speeches and the second time he couldn't own up to own his racist remark of Obama. Biden was quoted calling Obama "the first mainstream African American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy."

By the evening, the Delaware senator had issued a statement that he regretted those remarks.

When Jon Stewart brought up the quote, some members of his audience booed. Biden responded that he was trying to be complimentary.

"The word that got me in trouble is using the word 'clean,'" the senator said. "I should have said 'fresh.'"