OPP Poll........Speaker of the House..
Dec 9, 2022 12:24:31 #
proud republican wrote:
Kevin McCarthy...Or ..Andy Biggs?
Put all the Republican names into a drum and pick one. Then get down to REAL business, start by polling the people then act on the results.
Dec 9, 2022 12:29:00 #
F.D.R. wrote:
Put all the Republican names into a drum and pick one. Then get down to REAL business, start by polling the people then act on the results.
Hell no. “Republicans” have proven they’re worthless. Picking names at random from the voting register would give us better representation.
Dec 9, 2022 13:36:45 #
proud republican wrote:
Kevin McCarthy...Or ..Andy Biggs?
Nope..Scott Perry. Chairman of the Freedom Caucus...aka tea party 🥳!!
"You've got a friend in Pennsylvania "
Dec 9, 2022 13:47:59 #
Dec 9, 2022 14:33:57 #
Neither McCarthy nor Andy Biggs. Make it Jim Jordan. I’ll bet he could break Fauci. He scrapped the FBI whistleblower Schenk yesterday. Proved that he was a liar.
Dec 9, 2022 17:09:33 #
Dec 9, 2022 18:50:56 #
Wonttakeitanymore wrote:
Trey gowdy
He’s not worthy. Now practicing law in Greenville. He’s all hat and no cattle.
Dec 10, 2022 00:56:35 #
Dec 10, 2022 11:43:26 #
Looks like Mc Carthy doesn't have the votes to become speaker. No one else does either. I sugest he or another Republican make a deal with Democrats to secure his election.
Dec 10, 2022 15:11:12 #
JR-57 wrote:
No. Read again what I wrote. Remove them all.
I'm a bit confused by your "remove all" comment? You can't replace the entire house representation, they have already been elected and need to start work in 3-4 weeks. If you mean remove all of the current republican leadership, I see your point, but would be concerned that if all of the leadership on the right was new members, the old guard on the left would run circles around them and would effectively be running the show. Would anyone here want to get into a political chess match with Pelosi and/or Jefferies based on the arcane and obscure rules of parliamentary procedure?
Dec 10, 2022 15:37:24 #
SeaLass wrote:
I'm a bit confused by your "remove all" ... (show quote)
I do mean all. Everyone one of them, Ds and Rs. They’re either corrupt or tainted by the corruption. A pipe dream I know. I’m not aware of a legal way to do that. Real change won’t take place under the current constraints and at the voting booth.
Dec 10, 2022 16:20:06 #
JR-57 wrote:
I do mean all. Everyone one of them, Ds and Rs. They’re either corrupt or tainted by the corruption. A pipe dream I know. I’m not aware of a legal way to do that. Real change won’t take place under the current constraints and at the voting booth.
I think there are a few Republicans and even fewer Democrats that are trying to do the right thing, but they are vastly outnumbered. Don't make the mistake of blanket condemnation, there enough on here that do that
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.