JR-57 wrote:
That’s a lot of information to digest and it’s going to take me some time, which is increasing in value each day with the holidays approaching. Thanks for sharing.
Cornwallis said 1781
https://christianobserver.net/judaized-christianity-front-for-new-world-order-sen-mccarth/What Washington didn't do did not create a doctrine of conquest after Cornwallis’s surrender (1781) after hearing his statement for what now would become of America. This conquest document would have documented that a victorious nation (America) in war acquired sovereignty over the conquered nation (British Crown) and could exert its own legal and political jurisdiction chosen by its sovereign residents.
Note: The practice for creating a doctrine of conquest or treaty dates back at least to Roman law.
1783 Definitive Treaty of Peace aka Treaty of Paris that formally ended the Revolutionary War. The English game of snooker begins due to George Washington and the 3 Percenters/Paul Revere’s Raiders, Minute Men and other Colonist were absent/silent towards claiming the spoils of war they fought for.
This agreement was made without representation of George Washington and the American Patriots comprised the 3 Percenters, Paul Revere’s Raiders, Minute Men or any of the supporting Colonist that fought against King George III.
https://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/paris.aspThis Treaty was negotiated by Benjamin Franklin, a Englishman, 33rd degreed Mason, with titles of Esquire and Excellency for the King, and was also signed by other English Esquires, Adams, Jay, and Hartley as the King’s men of nobility.
For the Rule of Law choice lost, most important to me, I reference and old history book on The Common law for America as entitled 'Colonial Law, by Reinsch', he sums up what the Thirteen Colonies considered to be the final bases for all law in America or ever to be in America... "the colonies were so impressed with the idea of an overruling law of nature that the laws of God and so-called natural laws were regarded as the true laws, and all temporal legislation was considered to be binding only in so far as it was an expression of this natural law" Yes, back then there were some moral white hats. James Wilson, the foremost lawyer at the Constitutional Convention, a signer of the Declaration of Independence, and a man who was appointed to the Supreme Court in 1789 and was well familiar with this legal principal stated above called Natural Law and stated; "Parliament may, unquestionably, be controlled by natural or revealed law, proceeding from divine authority". It seems the King as victor and the King's men overruled this with their man-made Laws of the Sea, Maritime, and Admiralty Law.
https://www.lawbookexchange.com/pages/books/40766/paul-samuel-reinsch/english-common-law-in-the-early-american-colonies1787 The Republic was never defined and its Republican form of government for the people to install in each and every state to operate under. Because the States people rule over the federal, If Artical IV Section 4 were completed all current politicians would lose their authority over us. We would determine what freedoms, liberties, permissions and privileges we are to have or not. We then rule as sovereign men and women.
1789 First Act of Congress changed the title wording of the Constitution as it is stated in the Constitution’s Preamble in context as “this Constitution for the United States of America” changed to “the Constitution of the United States”, done just before Washington was sworn in as POTUS changing the word for to of and omitting of America for purposes of taking the oath of office is at min an err to be remedied or an outright fraud in basic contract law. You cannot change words and omit others from the original contract. Meaning and intent are in question. Their law
https://www.senate.gov/legislative/landmark-legislation/oath-act.htm#:~:text=On%20May%205%2C%201789%2C%20the%20Senate%20passed%20its,will%20support%20the%20Constitution%20of%20the%20United%20States.%22 VS the Preamble Title of the USA Constitution >
WE THE PEOPLE Of The United States, In Order To Form A More Perfect Union, Establish Justice, Insure Domestic Tranquility, Provide For The Common Defense, Promote The General Welfare, And Secure The Blessings Of Liberty To Ourselves And Our Posterity, Do Ordain And Establish "this Constitution For The United States Of America".
WE THE PEOPLE established and ordained the Constitution. WE are the ones who created the federal government with its three branches: legislative, executive, and judicial. WE are the ones who gave the federal government permission to exist and told it exactly what it had permission to do, when WE assigned enumerated powers to each branch.
WE are the “creator” – the federal government is merely our “creature”. (Federalist No. 33 (6th para), A. Hamilton.)
The first use of the Emergency and War Power Act was by George Washington in 1791. Washington used the Emergency Power portion of the Act. This was to enable Washington, at Hamilton’s insistence, to use an existing private bank, controlled by the Crown through its British Board of Trade, to become the first bank of the United States. Jefferson and two other men wrote constantly to Washington telling him that there was no such authority in the Constitution to create a bank. Neither Jefferson nor the other two men could sway Washington. Washington, using the Emergency Powers Act, went ahead and created the First Bank of the United States. Also at this time he overlaid the states into "districts of the United States." He did this so that those state banks, who after the creation of the first Bank, were forced to contract with the First Bank in New York so they could continue to operate with United States money. Washington did this because the United States deposited all the money it collected into all the private banks in each of the states from before the Revolutionary war to the institution of the first Bank of the United States. The United States wanted to centralize all its accounts in this First Bank while allowing the hundreds of other banks scattered throughout all the states to continue to hold its money.
This is much like the corporate takeovers of today, where a large bank absorbs small banks that continue to operate as satellite banks with all the accounts having to clear through the parent bank. This then allowed the foreign British controlled bank to more easily collect and pay back the debt owed the Crown by the State and United States as was directed in Article VI of the United States Constitution.
The First Bank
The First Bank of the United States was not at all owned by the Congress but was privately controlled by the British Board of Trade stockholders. The Bank, if begun in France, would be called the First Bank of France. Do not let the terminology fool you into thinking that it was a Bank created by Congress. The ownership was foreign. The "foreigners," noted as Stockholders, were many Americans and therefore, foreigners to the international banking industry. Most of these foreign bankers came from England. Chief Justice John Marshal held the second highest shares in this bank. The documents I have, show that Marshall was considered a "foreign stockholder." He was foreign because the bank was a foreign concern operating within America. Marshall, being a United States citizen, was a foreign Stockholder.
The Tories were helpful in setting the stage for the inception of the Bank. The Tories were people controlled and working for the King. The King did not want the Rothschilds or the Lombards to take control of the first bank in the United States. The King wanted his bank of England to control the first bank. This setup went back to the Treaty of 1783 and emanated from that treaty and those created after that. Remember, the King George made himself the Arch-treasurer of the United States of America.
American History is an interesting story when explored, opposed to as a child being told Washington chopped down a cherry tree, and could not tell a lie. And Franklin said we had a Republic and flew a kite in an electrical storm.
And don't forget the big one, we won the war, our independence and captured our freedoms and liberties.
We may as well not have a Constitution and Declaration of Independance