Dems Sucked, There Should Have Been A Red Wave.. (Page 2): North Dakota gets 2 senators pop.657 California gets 2 Senators Pop.9million I’m not going to explain it all for you because...

Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio

dtucker300 wrote:

Not interesting at all. Where did you come up with those numbers? Only 1/3 of the Senate seats were up for election this cycle. Yes, it's fair. If you want equity, move to Venezuela and you won't have to share any power with another party. Or better yet, move to PRK.

Senators use to represent their state until the progressive Marxists changed the elections to popular vote for Senators. I wouldn't expect an ignorant leftist such as you to understand this point.

North Dakota gets 2 senators pop.657
California gets 2 Senators Pop.9million
I’m not going to explain it all for you because you might’ve missed that day in civics class.
This reflects a lopsided result .
When the Republican states , also the states with the least populations get to decide elections as Minorities.
Which is what the right is fighting for today.
States Rightz.

bylm1-Bernie

Milosia2 wrote:

North Dakota gets 2 senators pop.657
California gets 2 Senators Pop.9million
I’m not going to explain it all for you because you might’ve missed that day in civics class.
This reflects a lopsided result .
When the Republican states , also the states with the least populations get to decide elections as Minorities.
Which is what the right is fighting for today.
States Rightz.

I'm sorry, who was it that missed that day in civics class?

jimpack123 Loc: wisconsin

vernon wrote:

lollol

Or perhaps more Smart people are tired of Trump's GOP

Smedley_buzkill

Milosia2 wrote:

North Dakota gets 2 senators pop.657
California gets 2 Senators Pop.9million
I’m not going to explain it all for you because you might’ve missed that day in civics class.
This reflects a lopsided result .
When the Republican states , also the states with the least populations get to decide elections as Minorities.
Which is what the right is fighting for today.
States Rightz.

Hey, Einstein! California has 52 Representatives and North Dakota has one. YOU must have missed THAT day.

archie bunker Loc: Texas

Milosia2 wrote:

North Dakota gets 2 senators pop.657
California gets 2 Senators Pop.9million
I’m not going to explain it all for you because you might’ve missed that day in civics class.
This reflects a lopsided result .
When the Republican states , also the states with the least populations get to decide elections as Minorities.
Which is what the right is fighting for today.
States Rightz.

Hey sweetie, the population of North Dakota was 774, 928 as of 2021.
You were off by a few.

EmilyD

Milosia2 wrote:

A point of interest :
The Senate democrats have gotten
18Mllillion more votes than the right , but ,
Still only get 50 seats.
Or the right represents 18 Million less people than Dems and still get 50 seats .
Is this fair ?????

What a stupid comment. Look up how Senators are chosen. (Hint: There are two for every state.)

It's the HOUSE that represents the population.....

saltwind 78 Loc: Murrells Inlet, South Carolina

Liberty Tree wrote:

Taking the House is a wave and the Senate would make it a bigger one. You would rather have Democrats cheat and win than play fair and lose.

Liberty, Again you claim the Democrats cheated in an election. It just ain't true. The Republicans were supposed to win by the usual number of votes in a midterm election. Instead they are facing stiff challenges in in most states. This is due to the conservative SCOTUS overturning of Roe, the crazy candidates that Trump endorsed, and most people want to get back to politics before Trump.

EmilyD

saltwind 78 wrote:

Liberty, Again you claim the Democrats cheated in an election. It just ain't true. The Republicans were supposed to win by the usual number of votes in a midterm election. Instead they are facing stiff challenges in in most states. This is due to the conservative SCOTUS overturning of Roe, the crazy candidates that Trump endorsed, and most people want to get back to politics before Trump.

So what's your reason that it's taking THREE times longer to count votes today than it did 20 years ago when they didn't have these super duper machines that are supposed to make the voting process much quicker than ever before??

Why was Florida, whose Governor is very strict on voter fraud, finished counting their votes the night of the election???

Why did the red wave work in that state??

Anianobrick

Liberty Tree wrote:

Taking the House is a wave and the Senate would make it a bigger one. You would rather have Democrats cheat and win than play fair
and lose.

First off, you haven't taken anything. There is absolutely no credible evidence this year or last that any cheating occurred. How many more courts along with the federal Supreme have to prove this. Face it, this country does not want an authoritarian, fascist leadership especially one headed by a former Manchurian president.

Anianobrick

What an intellectually confused group, so ignorant of history and civic affairs. Try researching facts and stop regurgitating bumper stickers.

EmilyD

Anianobrick wrote:

What an intellectually confused group, so ignorant of history and civic affairs. Try researching facts and stop regurgitating bumper stickers.

This is now. Times have changed. Stop regurgitating liberal talking points and start living in the present.

Why do you think it is taking so much longer today than it did 20 years ago when we didn't have all these wonderful machines that are supposed to make voting faster and easier to count? Polls used to all close at 7, and we knew by midnight who won.....Why is it taking THREE days for Arizona to count 150,000 votes now? I can do that by myself in about three hours!

https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/arizona-maricopa-county-election/2022/11/11/id/1095932/

moldyoldy

EmilyD wrote:

So what's your reason that it's taking THREE times longer to count votes today than it did 20 years ago when they didn't have these super duper machines that are supposed to make the voting process much quicker than ever before??

Why was Florida, whose Governor is very strict on voter fraud, finished counting their votes the night of the election???

Why did the red wave work in that state??

We have a lot more mail in voting and the gop does not want any counting ahead of time. More people are voting.

EmilyD

moldyoldy wrote:

We have a lot more mail in voting and the gop does not want any counting ahead of time. More people are voting.

And machines are faster. About a thousand times faster. Your excuse is BS. Mail in ballots should be received by election day PERIOD. Not three days later.

Why is it taking Arizona THREE days to count 150,000 votes? I can do it in about 3 hours....

https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/arizona-maricopa-county-election/2022/11/11/id/1095932/

archie bunker Loc: Texas

EmilyD wrote:

And machines are faster. About a thousand times faster. Your excuse is BS. Mail in ballots should be received by election day PERIOD. Not three days later.

Why is it taking Arizona THREE days to count 150,000 votes? I can do it in about 3 hours....

https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/arizona-maricopa-county-election/2022/11/11/id/1095932/

Compare the size, and population of Arizona to Texas, and Florida. In both Texas, and Florida, we had results on election night.
What's up with Arizona?

archie bunker Loc: Texas

moldyoldy wrote:

We have a lot more mail in voting and the gop does not want any counting ahead of time. More people are voting.

So, you live in Arizona? If so, why are you moldy? It's dry there. Possible personal hygiene problem?