One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
This is your VP!!... Harris says that threat from within is bigger than 9/11.
Page <prev 2 of 2
Sep 13, 2022 21:02:35   #
Wonttakeitanymore
 
Kevyn wrote:
She is absolutely right. The 9-11 attacks were terrible but had no chance of overthrowing our government. The scumbag MAGA insurrectionists led by an egomaniacal traitorous sociopath is another story.

Ubhavebt seen anything yet zombie

Reply
Sep 13, 2022 22:59:42   #
robertv3
 
animal planet wrote:
Robert it appears u and Kevy are cut from the same worn cloth. I bet u both like BLM, abortion on demand, open borders forever, people dying by the hundreds. Because of drugs coming in, and illegal thugs killing Americans and getting away with it. What a mess the Biden bosses have turned our beautiful country into. I hope they all get their due very soon.


Oh really? "the same", "...forever", "...people dying by the hundreds"? You're too careless in your description. Be more realistic when you describe people and what they "like".

Reply
Sep 13, 2022 23:00:27   #
robertv3
 
Kevyn wrote:
I don’t have any friends at CNN I rarely watch TV I read.


Reading's good.

Reply
 
 
Sep 13, 2022 23:05:40   #
robertv3
 
LogicallyRight wrote:
***The scumbag MAGA insurrectionists led by an egomaniacal traitorous sociopath is another story.
>>>Accept no such thing existed.


I think you mean "Except". Unless you mean "Accept that no such thing existed."

It's viewable on recordings. And it happened true to form, that is, important characters behaved similarly as they had before. Now we have lots of officially sworn testimony about it, in public view.

Reply
Sep 13, 2022 23:07:07   #
robertv3
 
Wonttakeitanymore wrote:
She better believe it! Dim witted slut


??

Reply
Sep 14, 2022 00:54:15   #
animal planet
 
robertv3 wrote:
Reading's good.


Reading is only good if what your reading is honest and truthful. You’ll never get that from the likes of The NY Times and some of the rag magazines out there.

Reply
Sep 14, 2022 11:35:24   #
robertv3
 
animal planet wrote:
Reading is only good if what your reading is honest and truthful.


That's roughly true.

animal planet wrote:

You’ll never get that from the likes of The NY Times and some of the rag magazines out there.


I look at the following online: 1.: The local newspaper, 2.: Al Jazeera world news, 3.: The Guardian, 4.: New York Times, and 5.: Washington Post; and usually once or twice a day I hear headline news from 6.: kpfa.org; and then fairly often I also look at 7.: Al Jazeera U.S. & Canada news, 8.: OnePoliticalPlaza (which is not exactly for news but occasionally gives some worthy news), and 9.: whatever comes up when I do a search on some topic (I've noticed businessinsider.com sometimes pops up with something I find interesting in these searches, but search results also go further afield than that).

When I search the internet, I use duckduckgo.com which doesn't track, rather than google.com which does track the user and gives the user what it thinks the user wants to see, thus making a confirmation bias.) (More rarely I go a step further to avoid confirmation bias, which is to search for each of two conflicting phrases and then comparing the two sets of results. Note that quality is worth a lot more than quantity.

Then on rare occasions I try to find more international sources of news; for a little while I looked at rt.com, and later a Nigerian news outlet (they seem very Christian fundamentalist), DuMonde Diplomatique in English, Swedish news in English, and Der Spiegel in English. It would be better if I could read news in other languages but I'm only fluent enough in English.

Epoch News (which I used to get in print) has a series telling the evils of the Chinese Communist Party, which I think is a good series (though I didn't read it all), but the rest of the main part of Epoch News seems to have succumbed to false conspiracy theories.

Addendum:

One can find anything on the internet, but that doesn't mean it's true. There are web pages that "prove" the world is flat, and other web pages that say it's round like a ball. Since the two sets of web pages conflict with each other, you know that some of them are not really true. But even the false ones might still be honest and sincere. To figure out which set is true requires some thinking or experience, or probably both thinking and experience. Trust in authority doesn't always work.

Addendum #2:

And then there are books.

One time I deliberately bought a book by an author I didn't like or even hated. That was Anne Coulter. I got the book with the idea that maybe I would learn something different there than I did from my usual sources. I got a third of the way through it. She did have a useful comparison between Phyllis Schlafly and Gloria Steinem, which was thought-provoking, so I guess the book may have been worthwhile.

But more often I get a good book or two, and sometimes read them entirely. I tend to remember a long time, and make up for lack of quantity by thinking more.

Addendum #3:

Youtube: Information on youtube ranges from awful to great. There are TED talks on youtube. The physicist Sabine Hossenfelder is informative and entertaining. There are a couple of comedians who are also good commentators: Trevor Noah and Roy Wood Jr. Roy Wood Jr., with others, produced a little entertaining documentary on gun culture in Switzerland. I think it's quite informative and worthwhile. Roy Wood Jr. and his coworkers are also good at commenting on racism. If anybody wants to understand racism in current-day America, look up Roy Wood Jr. on youtube and see what he and his coworkers say about it.

Reply
 
 
Sep 19, 2022 00:47:42   #
LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago
 
robertv3 wrote:
I think you mean "Except". Unless you mean "Accept that no such thing existed."

It's viewable on recordings. And it happened true to form, that is, important characters behaved similarly as they had before. Now we have lots of officially sworn testimony about it, in public view.


I'll accept you correction to the choice of word. The rest is bull shit. There was no insurrection. Period. And President Trump is more sound of mind then the current president impostor, in place only through massive fraud. FACT.

Reply
Sep 20, 2022 01:44:00   #
robertv3
 
LogicallyRight wrote:
I'll accept you correction to the choice of word. The rest is bull shit. There was no insurrection. Period. And President Trump is more sound of mind then the current president impostor, in place only through massive fraud. FACT.


How strange that one named "LogicallyRight" would apply words "b*ll sh**" and "FACT" as you did.

I think you're really careless. Your first sentence is logical enough ("I'll accept you {sic} correction to the choice of word.") but the rest looks like at the end of your first sentence your brain suddenly saw it was 5 o'clock and left work really fast.

Reply
Sep 20, 2022 13:23:38   #
LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago
 
Are you really that ignorant, or are you paid by soros or such to act stupid on OPP, and post your lies and exaggerations? Your usual post show that you have little to no capacity for logic. Much less being right. Now you have been properly spanked. Go back to mommy's basement and sniff her panties. I'm done with you.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.