One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
FBI Affidavit Misled a Magistrate Judge on a Search Warrant in a Plot to Seize and Forfeit Contents of Safety Deposit Boxes
Aug 21, 2022 07:05:31   #
fullspinzoo
 
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2022/08/fbi_affidavit_misled_a_magistrate_judge_on_a_search_warrant_in_plot_to_seize_and_forfeit_contents_of_safety_deposit_boxes.html

Reply
Aug 21, 2022 07:31:03   #
Liberty Tree
 
fullspinzoo wrote:
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2022/08/fbi_affidavit_misled_a_magistrate_judge_on_a_search_warrant_in_plot_to_seize_and_forfeit_contents_of_safety_deposit_boxes.html


The redacted affidavit that will be presented justifying the search warrant served on Trump will be heavily redacted. The only thing that will be presented will be accusations without proof except for references to comments by unnamed sources. Anything that might be favorable to Trump or questionable will be redacted. The FBI has been down this road many times.

Reply
Aug 21, 2022 08:37:55   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
The redacted affidavit that will be presented justifying the search warrant served on Trump will be heavily redacted. The only thing that will be presented will be accusations without proof except for references to comments by unnamed sources. Anything that might be favorable to Trump or questionable will be redacted. The FBI has been down this road many times.


You are exactly right. And all the while they have the boxes and can doctor them up as much as they want. It is a farce and nothing from them should be believed at this point. Nothing. They are working to hide their sins and are involved in criminal activity.

Reply
 
 
Aug 21, 2022 08:50:34   #
Kevyn
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
The redacted affidavit that will be presented justifying the search warrant served on Trump will be heavily redacted. The only thing that will be presented will be accusations without proof except for references to comments by unnamed sources. Anything that might be favorable to Trump or questionable will be redacted. The FBI has been down this road many times.

The names of witnesses and sources will be redacted to protect them from retaliation and allow them to continue to provide evidence.

Reply
Aug 21, 2022 09:02:02   #
Liberty Tree
 
Kevyn wrote:
The names of witnesses and sources will be redacted to protect them from retaliation and allow them to continue to provide evidence.


BS, it is to keep the defense from rebutting lies, misinformation and hearsay.. The FBI cannot be trusted. If the FBI waned to release some information and the defense did not you would e screaming coverup and what do the have to hide?

Reply
Aug 21, 2022 09:15:31   #
jimpack123 Loc: wisconsin
 
fullspinzoo wrote:
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2022/08/fbi_affidavit_misled_a_magistrate_judge_on_a_search_warrant_in_plot_to_seize_and_forfeit_contents_of_safety_deposit_boxes.html


If so then it shows that not everyone is Honest including Crooked Donnie Trump. who should have never took classified documents to Florida. So whine all you want Crooked Donnie got caught with his hand in the cookie jar and you still want him to be POTUS. I suggest that you pick some one else in 2024. Perhaps Lizzie lol

Reply
Aug 21, 2022 11:42:20   #
Kevyn
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
BS, it is to keep the defense from rebutting lies, misinformation and hearsay.. The FBI cannot be trusted. If the FBI waned to release some information and the defense did not you would e screaming coverup and what do the have to hide?


You realize that the only reason the investigation is public is that Trump blabbed it. If he would have returned the stolen property they would not have sought a warrant. They did not notify the press when serving the warrant Trump did.

Reply
 
 
Aug 21, 2022 11:59:16   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Kevyn wrote:
You realize that the only reason the investigation is public is that Trump blabbed it. If he would have returned the stolen property they would not have sought a warrant. They did not notify the press when serving the warrant Trump did.


MSLSD word salad.

Reply
Aug 21, 2022 12:45:48   #
fullspinzoo
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
BS, it is to keep the defense from rebutting lies, misinformation and hearsay.. The FBI cannot be trusted. If the FBI waned to release some information and the defense did not you would e screaming coverup and what do the have to hide?


The FBI would have planted something, if they thought they could have gotten away with it. I wish they had tried and we caught them on tape. They are the worst. Wray is no different than his old boss, Comey.

Reply
Aug 21, 2022 12:48:42   #
fullspinzoo
 
fullspinzoo wrote:
The FBI would have planted something, if they thought they could have gotten away with it. I wish they had tried and we caught them on tape. They are the worst. Wray is no different than his old boss, Comey.


Why does Trump put himself through all this headache? Because he really cares about this country. Anybody else would have screw it. This is more than anyone should have to contend with. That's why I think part of the reason so many people respect Trump. Nobody would put up this BS from schmucks like Garland, the demented weasel, or Wray, corrupt as Hell.

Reply
Aug 21, 2022 13:12:52   #
Sew_What
 
fullspinzoo wrote:
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2022/08/fbi_affidavit_misled_a_magistrate_judge_on_a_search_warrant_in_plot_to_seize_and_forfeit_contents_of_safety_deposit_boxes.html


Simple question, does American Thinker know what's in the affidavit, in other words, did they give an opinion or did they provide physical evidence of a unredacted warrant to assess it.

I don't understand why you worship such a simpleton...must be a lot like you...there nothing dumber than an opinion without any tangible evidence. It is just as plausible that the judge had enough information to perform a legitimate warrant seizure. Where is YOUR information that is actual tracible evidence? See the justice department doesn't have dumb lawyers like Alex Jones paid good money for and then lost the case...of course those lawyers did the right thing....and maybe just maybe the DOJ did the right thing too.

Reply
 
 
Aug 22, 2022 12:42:26   #
Justice101
 
Sew_What wrote:
Simple question, does American Thinker know what's in the affidavit, in other words, did they give an opinion or did they provide physical evidence of a unredacted warrant to assess it.

I don't understand why you worship such a simpleton...must be a lot like you...there nothing dumber than an opinion without any tangible evidence. It is just as plausible that the judge had enough information to perform a legitimate warrant seizure. Where is YOUR information that is actual tracible evidence? See the justice department doesn't have dumb lawyers like Alex Jones paid good money for and then lost the case...of course those lawyers did the right thing....and maybe just maybe the DOJ did the right thing too.
Simple question, does American Thinker know what's... (show quote)


American Thinker is offering a theory or hypothesis based upon what is known by the information in the search warrant and other materials that were released to the public last week by Judge Rhinehart et al. We, on OPP are all offering our opinions based upon whatever criterion we choose to use: beliefs, biases, comparisons, theories, research, hypotheses based on material evidence, and word salads thrown in for good measure.

You are so funny to criticize people for not backing up opinions with facts when the lefties are usually the ones who don't back up their arguments, or only find one-sided sources to back up their opinions/arguments (i.e.: Raw Story, a favorite lefty go-to).

Sorry, I was referring to a different American Thinker article that I had read yesterday and realized that the one above is similar, but not in regards to Mar-a-Largo. My mistake.

Reply
Aug 22, 2022 13:23:42   #
77Reaganite Loc: Athens, GA, United States
 
fullspinzoo wrote:
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2022/08/fbi_affidavit_misled_a_magistrate_judge_on_a_search_warrant_in_plot_to_seize_and_forfeit_contents_of_safety_deposit_boxes.html


Folks this was a phishing Expedition! They wanted all of Trump's material on CrossFire hurricane but it wasn't there at Mar-A-Lago you think he would be that dumb to leave it there I don't think so! This is blowing up terribly in their faces anyway! It's funny that the same agents who rated Mar-A-Lago are under investigation by John Durham AKA The Punisher! You won't hear the media say that!

Reply
Aug 23, 2022 06:49:00   #
nonalien1 Loc: Mojave Desert
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
The redacted affidavit that will be presented justifying the search warrant served on Trump will be heavily redacted. The only thing that will be presented will be accusations without proof except for references to comments by unnamed sources. Anything that might be favorable to Trump or questionable will be redacted. The FBI has been down this road many times.




Why doesn't Trump release his copy of the warrant and the itemized list of evidence taken? You know legally he has to have a copy

Reply
Aug 23, 2022 12:21:32   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
nonalien1 wrote:
Why doesn't Trump release his copy of the warrant and the itemized list of evidence taken? You know legally he has to have a copy


They refused to give his attorney on the scene a copy.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.