One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The IRS removes requirement for new agents to be willing to use deadly force.
Aug 17, 2022 20:41:35   #
son of witless
 
https://www.newsweek.com/irs-deletes-requirement-that-new-agents-willing-use-deadly-force-1733352

Reply
Aug 17, 2022 20:48:19   #
Liberty Tree
 
son of witless wrote:
https://www.newsweek.com/irs-deletes-requirement-that-new-agents-willing-use-deadly-force-1733352


That is the official version, but unofficially it may still be there.

Reply
Aug 17, 2022 20:55:03   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
son of witless wrote:
https://www.newsweek.com/irs-deletes-requirement-that-new-agents-willing-use-deadly-force-1733352


They may have removed it from their website. It does not mean it is removed.

Reply
 
 
Aug 17, 2022 20:56:25   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
That is the official version, but unofficially it may still be there.


No rational person believes them.

Reply
Aug 17, 2022 21:10:58   #
son of witless
 
AuntiE wrote:
They may have removed it from their website. It does not mean it is removed.


I have researched this. It made no sense when I first read it. Yes some IRS might rarely be involved in a gun fight, but the majority are no more than glorified accountants. In one account I read, this armed and deadly force component was only for a special unit within the IRS. A very small unit.

Reply
Aug 17, 2022 21:13:17   #
CarryOn
 
son of witless wrote:
https://www.newsweek.com/irs-deletes-requirement-that-new-agents-willing-use-deadly-force-1733352


It would mean a lot more if they also sent back all the weapons and ammo they have amassed. The military would be happy to take it, given they left so much in Afghanistan.

Reply
Aug 17, 2022 21:14:45   #
RascalRiley Loc: Somewhere south of Detroit
 
son of witless wrote:
https://www.newsweek.com/irs-deletes-requirement-that-new-agents-willing-use-deadly-force-1733352

This is terrible. How are these brand new agents going to protect themselves from those that refuse to comply with being arrested for reeducation.

Reply
 
 
Aug 17, 2022 22:02:27   #
son of witless
 
RascalRiley wrote:
This is terrible. How are these brand new agents going to protect themselves from those that refuse to comply with being arrested for reeducation.


That is quite a good question. I can see that you are destined for higher things.

" The world steps aside for the man who knows where he is going. " James Allen.

I have told Bad Bob in the far past that he should apply for the job of guard at one of these reeducation camps, once the Democrats consolidate their power, and can roll out these camps on a large scale. That's where he is best suited. Kind of the Sergent Schultz type.

I think you should apply at one of these camps as a Warden, because you are always thinking ahead, anticipating problems, and searching for their solutions. There would be no escapes from your reeducation camp. I bet they make you a Colonel. You could wear a monocle.

Reply
Aug 17, 2022 22:11:15   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
son of witless wrote:
That is quite a good question. I can see that you are destined for higher things.

" The world steps aside for the man who knows where he is going. " James Allen.

I have told Bad Bob in the far past that he should apply for the job of guard at one of these reeducation camps, once the Democrats consolidate their power, and can roll out these camps on a large scale. That's where he is best suited. Kind of the Sergent Schultz type.

I think you should apply at one of these camps as a Warden, because you are always thinking ahead, anticipating problems, and searching for their solutions. There would be no escapes from your reeducation camp. I bet they make you a Colonel. You could wear a monocle.
That is quite a good question. I can see that you ... (show quote)


πŸ˜†πŸ˜†πŸ˜†πŸ˜†πŸ˜†πŸ˜†πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘

Reply
Aug 17, 2022 22:26:52   #
son of witless
 
proud republican wrote:
πŸ˜†πŸ˜†πŸ˜†πŸ˜†πŸ˜†πŸ˜†πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘


As the two glasses might have toasted RascalRiley's promotion to Colonel said Klink.

Reply
Aug 18, 2022 12:39:55   #
Wonttakeitanymore
 
son of witless wrote:
I have researched this. It made no sense when I first read it. Yes some IRS might rarely be involved in a gun fight, but the majority are no more than glorified accountants. In one account I read, this armed and deadly force component was only for a special unit within the IRS. A very small unit.


The ones for trump supporters and Christian’s!

Reply
 
 
Aug 18, 2022 18:48:37   #
Ricktloml
 
son of witless wrote:
https://www.newsweek.com/irs-deletes-requirement-that-new-agents-willing-use-deadly-force-1733352


Isn't that precious

Reply
Aug 19, 2022 12:28:48   #
Oldsalt
 
This is one of the most frightening things to have happen in America. A standing army that is not uniformed and can only operate inside of the country against it's citizens. There is NO reason Federal Officers other than the U.S.Marchals and the Boarder Control/Ice to be carrying a badge and a gun. The FBI and the IRS do 99% of their work on the computor. If they need to serve a warrent they should be going to the local Sheriff's office and requesting there assistance. I think all of the citizenry would feel a lot safer.

Reply
Aug 19, 2022 12:30:14   #
DamnYANKEE
 
son of witless wrote:
https://www.newsweek.com/irs-deletes-requirement-that-new-agents-willing-use-deadly-force-1733352


Good friggin luck with THAT one at My House ( alamo )

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.