Shouldn't the Clinton's be held to a higher standard of truthtelling than Alex Jones? (Page 5): My vision is fine but have your bilateral retinal detachments checked out and surgically...

Big Kahuna

moldyoldy wrote:

I see that you are blinded by the orange glow.

My vision is fine but have your bilateral retinal detachments checked out and surgically corrected you blind bat.

moldyoldy

WEBCO wrote:

I watched him, under oath, say that it wasn't because of the don't indict a sitting president clause. You spin whatever web of lies you want, it doesn't change the facts.

Watch him again under oath.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1G9cB4vk7Go

WEBCO

moldyoldy wrote:

Watch him again under oath.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1G9cB4vk7Go

Watch the whole thing and you will see him back track/clarify that that wasn't the case.

The whole Mueller investigation was based on lies, all of it.

Enjoy your ignorance, it will prepare you for your dementia

CarryOn

moldyoldy wrote:

Russia if you are listening. Then just like magic, Wikileaks.

LOL, moldy. You're contradicting yourself. First you claim that the only reason the mueller investigation didn't result in clear and convincing evidence is because President Trump learned from his dad to "never leave a paper trail, no email, no voicemail ... " and that's how he "covered his butt" and escaped any charges. But THEN you claim, at a one of his massive rallies being viewed by millions of people on national television, he "ordered" wikileaks to reveal hrc's emails and golly gee he must have had the power to make wikileaks do it because they did.

Funny how the mueller team couldn't prove that was anything more than a joke, even with their 13 biased angry democrats working nonstop for over two years. Anybody with a lick of sense knew that was a joke.

It's just your TDS showing. Hanging onto the hate because if you let go of it there's nothing to fill the void.

CarryOn

Mikeyavelli wrote:

👍👍👍👍👍👏👏👏👏👏
Bravo!

Why, thank you, kind sir!

moldyoldy

CarryOn wrote:

LOL, moldy. You're contradicting yourself. First... (show quote)

He said Russia if you are listening. Apparently Russia was listening. They had Wikileaks release stolen information.

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

WEBCO wrote:

Watch the whole thing and you will see him back track/clarify that that wasn't the case.

The whole Mueller investigation was based on lies, all of it.

Enjoy your ignorance, it will prepare you for your dementia

Bunch of odd people on the orange side.. you guys refuse to believe the statements as they were made, but when the "Oh damn, I did not intend to say that" excuse starts, that you hold as if written in stone..

The most criminal of all who ever managed to reach the oval and you will adore him for decades..

Getting my new and wonderful internet service as we type , so will be missing most of the debate...

CarryOn

moldyoldy wrote:

He said Russia if you are listening. Apparently Russia was listening. They had Wikileaks release stolen information.

LMAO!! Quick! Somebody tell mueller and his 13 angry democrats!! Maybe there's still time to salvage this vendatta after all!!!

And again, where's the proof??? This Senate report is filled with ambiguous words and phrases such as your referral to "apparently" russia was listening. There was also "very likely," "might have been aware," "may have known" -- all of which are completely useless when proof is important and necessary. All that is, is a bunch of vindictive, biased people trying to connect dots that they cannot connect and so resort to using innuendo and suggestion in some desperate attempt to plant the notion that it's a possible conclusion. It didn't work for them, and it doesn't work for you, either.

WEBCO

moldyoldy wrote:

He said Russia if you are listening. Apparently Russia was listening. They had Wikileaks release stolen information.

Wikileaks is controlled by Russia?

Cyclical logic, is not logic

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Mikeyavelli wrote:

Stuff like this will be protected by the media and Washington DC until there is a purging of 99.9% of politicians. They permit this, cover for it, and engage in their own brand of corruption.
No lefty will admit that this is Hunter Biden snorting drugs off a prostitute's schumer. And they will be backed up by 99.9% of Washington DC and 100% of the media.

Hunter on the hunt for?

Getting close to a dark hole.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

permafrost wrote:

Bunch of odd people on the orange side.. you guys refuse to believe the statements as they were made, but when the "Oh damn, I did not intend to say that" excuse starts, that you hold as if written in stone..

The most criminal of all who ever managed to reach the oval and you will adore him for decades..

Getting my new and wonderful internet service as we type , so will be missing most of the debate...

A review of Hillary and her old man is in order;
Hillary the Scandals
https://youtu.be/BYKAzJcU-DA

Mikeyavelli

moldyoldy wrote:

I see that you are blinded by the orange glow.

Like you are blinded by the flashy white toothed jackassy grin of your idol Brockobamma?

moldyoldy

Mikeyavelli wrote:

Like you are blinded by the flashy white toothed jackassy grin of your idol Brockobamma?

The jackass is anyone who still promotes those lies.

Big Kahuna

Mikeyavelli wrote:

Like you are blinded by the flashy white toothed jackassy grin of your idol Brockobamma?

Mikeyavelli

moldyoldy wrote:

The jackass is anyone who still promotes those lies.

Ain't no lie, Brockobamma is the biggest hoax in history, any history.