One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Check out topic: A new subpoena
Main
At least 884 people have been charged in the Capitol insurrection so far. This searchable table shows them all.
<<return to digest
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
Jul 26, 2022 11:17:54   #
EmilyD
 
DASHY wrote:
People use words to describe a situation. The Justice Department makes the decision about the proper criminal charges. Many laws were broken on January 6. Roughly 165 of the 800+ cases brought so far as a result of the Jan 6 coup attempt have been fully adjudicated, with 65 receiving jail or prison terms. A federal charge of insurrection is rare and has almost never been made in American history. It seems a bit unpatriotic to claim the crimes that were committed on Jan 6 are OK with you as long as the crime of "insurrection" is not one of them.
People use words to describe a situation. The Just... (show quote)

TROLL

Reply
Jul 26, 2022 11:19:32   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
DASHY wrote:
People use words to describe a situation. The Justice Department makes the decision about the proper criminal charges. Many laws were broken on January 6. Roughly 165 of the 800+ cases brought so far as a result of the Jan 6 coup attempt have been fully adjudicated, with 65 receiving jail or prison terms. A federal charge of insurrection is rare and has almost never been made in American history. It seems a bit unpatriotic to claim the crimes that were committed on Jan 6 are OK with you as long as the crime of "insurrection" is not one of them.
People use words to describe a situation. The Just... (show quote)


TROLL

Reply
Jul 26, 2022 11:29:35   #
DASHY
 
JR-57 wrote:
Careful there Dash, I’d hate to see you fall into the group that labels a large group of people based upon the actions of a few. Sounds like we agree, it wasn’t an insurrection. Was it wrong? Absolutely. Should the violators be tried and if convicted pay for their crime? Absolutely. All within the confines of the law. The Sixth Amendment guarantees the rights of criminal defendants, including the right to a public trial without unnecessary delay, the right to a lawyer, the right to an impartial jury, and the right to know who your accusers are and the nature of the charges and evidence against you. Some of the accused rights have been violated.
Careful there Dash, I’d hate to see you fall into ... (show quote)


We agree the crime of "insurrection" has not been charged against any individual who was involved in the Jan 6 riot. It probably never will be. The Justice Department should investigate claims that civil rights of the accused were violated.

Reply
Check out topic: Trump Lawyer John Eastman Arrested in Phoenix on Charges Related to 2020 Alternate Elector...
Jul 26, 2022 11:37:19   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
Trespassing, you are either woefully ignorant or just playing a game.


Trespassing, B&E, assault, those little things?

Reply
Jul 26, 2022 11:40:42   #
EmilyD
 
DASHY wrote:
We agree the crime of "insurrection" has not been charged against any individual who was involved in the Jan 6 riot. It probably never will be. The Justice Department should investigate claims that civil rights of the accused were violated.

TROLL

Reply
Jul 26, 2022 11:44:23   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
EmilyD wrote:
TROLL



Reply
Jul 26, 2022 11:52:04   #
JR-57 Loc: South Carolina
 
DASHY wrote:
We agree the crime of "insurrection" has not been charged against any individual who was involved in the Jan 6 riot. It probably never will be. The Justice Department should investigate claims that civil rights of the accused were violated.

Only because it wasn’t an insurrection by definition. Therefore insurrection should not be used to describe the events of that day. It’s misleading and deceitful to do so. The DOJ should but won’t.

Reply
 
 
Jul 26, 2022 13:36:42   #
DASHY
 
JR-57 wrote:
Only because it wasn’t an insurrection by definition. Therefore insurrection should not be used to describe the events of that day. It’s misleading and deceitful to do so. The DOJ should but won’t.


DOJ has determined events of Jan 6 do not meet the criminal code of justice definition of insurrection. People should stop using that descriptive word.

Reply
Jul 26, 2022 13:41:23   #
EmilyD
 
DASHY wrote:
DOJ has determined events of Jan 6 do not meet the criminal code of justice definition of insurrection. People should stop using that descriptive word.

TROLL

Reply
Jul 26, 2022 13:46:06   #
JR-57 Loc: South Carolina
 
DASHY wrote:
DOJ has determined events of Jan 6 do not meet the criminal code of justice definition of insurrection. People should stop using that descriptive word.

We agree on something? Color me shocked. Will you stop using it too Dashy?

Reply
Jul 26, 2022 14:05:36   #
EmilyD
 
JR-57 wrote:
We agree on something? Color me shocked. Will you stop using it too Dashy?

I still think someone who responds to a post, where someone else is sad and missing her deceased husband, with their TDS comment about Trump is a troll. If that isn't an attempt to stir up trouble on a forum, I don't know what is.

Reply
Check out topic: Will biden change his mind about debate on May 27th??
Jul 26, 2022 19:01:24   #
jelun
 
Let me guess, you haven't watched all of those Republicans testify with facts, under oath, about the advanced planning for 1/6/21.
It's so hard to actually face facts and have to consider what really happened, isn't it?

Liberty Tree wrote:
Trespassing, you are either woefully ignorant or just playing a game.

Reply
Jul 26, 2022 19:03:21   #
jelun
 
You have absolutely no idea what DOJ has considered or determined.
Please, stop pretending that you have knowledge that nobody has.



quote=DASHY]DOJ has determined events of Jan 6 do not meet the criminal code of justice definition of insurrection. People should stop using that descriptive word.[/quote]

Reply
Jul 26, 2022 19:06:06   #
JR-57 Loc: South Carolina
 
EmilyD wrote:
I still think someone who responds to a post, where someone else is sad and missing her deceased husband, with their TDS comment about Trump is a troll. If that isn't an attempt to stir up trouble on a forum, I don't know what is.

I’m not aware of the post you’re referencing.

Reply
Jul 26, 2022 19:33:33   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
JR-57 wrote:
I’m not aware of the post you’re referencing.


Nor I

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
<<return to digest
Check out topic: Democrats Suddenly Betray Biden over 1 Evil Move – Join GOP in Passing Landmark Bill
Main
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.