One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Here's A Little Twist On Who May Have Leaked And Why
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
May 4, 2022 10:20:54   #
Rose42
 
woodguru wrote:
They have it now...don't they.

You need to worry that at least 60% of Americans do not want Roe V Wade overturned.


That doesn’t make it right. If 80% of people thought rape was ok that wouldn’t make it right either.

Standing with the majority does not make something right or moral.

Reply
May 4, 2022 13:45:05   #
amadjuster Loc: Texas Panhandle
 
whole2th wrote:
As 33 billion in weaponry is asked for by the Biden Regime and 2000 Mules documentary premiered yesterday, the shiny object we're to look at is Roe v. Wade.


Wow! Your Jew hating has really f____ed up your brain.

Reply
May 4, 2022 14:22:38   #
Ri-chard Loc: 23322
 
Smedley_buzkill wrote:
I would like to point out that you never did answer my question. Where, in the US Constitution, is a right to an abortion, controlled at the whim of the Federal government, specified?


He doesn't know, he just makes up wish list.

Reply
 
 
May 4, 2022 15:18:46   #
amadjuster Loc: Texas Panhandle
 
woodguru wrote:
Yet it was never mentioned in founding documents?


It is called the 10th Amendment.

Reply
May 4, 2022 15:20:12   #
amadjuster Loc: Texas Panhandle
 
RascalRiley wrote:
You forget Canada.

But Canada is really tough to get into.

No freedom lovers please.


It's easy for draft dodgers.

Reply
May 4, 2022 15:32:15   #
RascalRiley Loc: Somewhere south of Detroit
 
amadjuster wrote:
It's easy for draft dodgers.

It was easier for anyone including draft dodgers to get into Canada back in the 60’s and 70’s.

Reply
May 4, 2022 18:59:18   #
Samael
 
President Biden use the issue of the leak today To urge people to vote he even warned them that homosexual students might not be allowed in class in some states there was an article in the New York post quoting his speech

Reply
 
 
May 4, 2022 19:34:39   #
RascalRiley Loc: Somewhere south of Detroit
 
Samael wrote:
President Biden use the issue of the leak today To urge people to vote he even warned them that homosexual students might not be allowed in class in some states there was an article in the New York post quoting his speech


This is a good expiration.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/white-house-says-biden-struck-trump-hold-gop

Reply
May 6, 2022 21:45:20   #
microphor Loc: Home is TN
 
woodguru wrote:
This gets away from the kneejerk call that it would have had to be a liberal, it looks at what a leak accomplishes, and it is not what you would think.

The mainstream side of the bench uses all the time and energy they can to get conservative justices to bend and moderate harsh opinions.

A radical conservative that believes the ruling as written would want to leak to lock that position in, Alito's opinion is scant on fact or adhering to precedent or historical reality...but the leak serves to lock this position in concrete.

https://www.rawstory.com/supreme-court-abortion-2657257324/?utm_source=push_notifications
This gets away from the kneejerk call that it woul... (show quote)


It was the left. That's my take.

Reply
May 6, 2022 22:10:44   #
Barbancon
 
Alito’s opinion is scant on fact, precedent, and historical reality?

Fact: the states never delegated to the federal government the authority to regulate abortion

Fact: the constitution is silent on abortion

Fact: all powers not expressly delegated to the federal government are reserved to the states

Precedent: abortion was illegal in all 13 colonies and all 50 states for all of (British and United States) American history. All of the 17th, 18th, 19th, and first 3/4 of the 20th century (until the 1970s).

Historical reality: Abortion has always been illegal, at all times, everywhere in this country until after the communist funded and inspired social revolution of the 1960s whose purpose was to destabilize the United States.

Fact: Self-control and birth-control make abortion largely unnecessary

Fact: the left find it impossible to tell the truth about anything because the truth exposes them as lying subversives, which is why they are resorting to mass censorship like the thuggish, oppressive and frankly dangerous power mad tyrants they are.

Reply
May 6, 2022 22:35:31   #
RascalRiley Loc: Somewhere south of Detroit
 
Barbancon wrote:
Alito’s opinion is scant on fact, precedent, and historical reality?

Fact: the states never delegated to the federal government the authority to regulate abortion

Fact: the constitution is silent on abortion

Fact: all powers not expressly delegated to the federal government are reserved to the states

Precedent: abortion was illegal in all 13 colonies and all 50 states for all of (British and United States) American history. All of the 17th, 18th, 19th, and first 3/4 of the 20th century (until the 1970s).

Historical reality: Abortion has always been illegal, at all times, everywhere in this country until after the communist funded and inspired social revolution of the 1960s whose purpose was to destabilize the United States.

Fact: Self-control and birth-control make abortion largely unnecessary

Fact: the left find it impossible to tell the truth about anything because the truth exposes them as lying subversives, which is why they are resorting to mass censorship like the thuggish and oppressive power mad tyrants they are.
Alito’s opinion is scant on fact, precedent, and h... (show quote)
Your last paragraph is describing half of Americans.

Fact: the left find it impossible to tell the truth about anything because the truth exposes them as lying subversives, which is why they are resorting to mass censorship like the thuggish and oppressive power mad tyrants they are.

Are you are sitting on a high perch?

Reply
 
 
May 9, 2022 12:54:04   #
Barbancon
 
Yes, I am. My English ancestors founded this country and its institutions (both the British royal and American republicans versions) and I have inherited the duty, and sworn an oath to protect it from foreign and domestic enemies.

They expected their heirs to preserve English liberties and to contest the pretensions of anyone seeking to diminish them.

To our temporary guests America is just a vast bourgeois shopping mall to be economically exploited by an oligarchy of banks and corporations, its governance another centralized, authoritarian left wing experiment.

That is not why we created to the United States. To us it is our inheritance. We created this country to continue our tradition of self-rule under the rule if law, specifically to maintain the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity. It is our natural law right and duty to contest the authority of anyone that would try to take that away from us.

It is actually against the law of nature for guests to so abuse the hospitality of hosts as to try to completely usurp the authority of the masters of the house who offered them shelter under the rules of hospitality.

That is why we view the left as hostile barbarians.

Reply
May 9, 2022 13:07:09   #
Ri-chard Loc: 23322
 
Barbancon wrote:
Yes, I am. My English ancestors founded this country and its institutions (both the British royal and American republicans versions) and I have inherited the duty, and sworn an oath to protect it from foreign and domestic enemies.

They expected their heirs to preserve English liberties and to contest the pretensions of anyone seeking to diminish them.

Those whose ancestors did make the same sacrifices and share the same illustrious successes as mine do not have the same claim to this inheritance.
Yes, I am. My English ancestors founded this count... (show quote)


Remember, there were no Democrats or Republican party's during the founding years. Those years were managed by the Masonic order, English landowners and Illuminati club members. And they left us with all their signs of adoration and loyalties all through Washington DC in architecture, engineering, artworks and the seven hills.. Note; the common man wasn't allowed to vote during the founding years. King Geoge remained in power as the Arch-treasurer/ $$ and Prince elector/ Principle vote of the united States of America per his 1783 Treaty dictate.
The war was over and he said so as the victor..

Reply
Jun 28, 2022 14:12:28   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
woodguru wrote:
This gets away from the kneejerk call that it would have had to be a liberal, it looks at what a leak accomplishes, and it is not what you would think.

The mainstream side of the bench uses all the time and energy they can to get conservative justices to bend and moderate harsh opinions.

A radical conservative that believes the ruling as written would want to leak to lock that position in, Alito's opinion is scant on fact or adhering to precedent or historical reality...but the leak serves to lock this position in concrete.

https://www.rawstory.com/supreme-court-abortion-2657257324/?utm_source=push_notifications
This gets away from the kneejerk call that it woul... (show quote)


P'shaw! It was leaked to rile their little footsoldiers so they would hurt people and break things prior to the midterms.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.