One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Is it ok for a Supreme Court Nominee to lie in order to get appointed? Should they be removed?
Page <<first <prev 7 of 19 next> last>>
May 6, 2022 21:37:06   #
RandyBrian Loc: Texas
 
RascalRiley wrote:
Google it. Or ignore it. If you have to ask for sources we are not on the same page.


As Big Bad Bob likes to say, if you can't back it up it's......well, we'll just use the word 'opinion'. You know the smelly kind of opinion that messes up the meadows behind male cows.

Reply
May 6, 2022 21:45:25   #
RandyBrian Loc: Texas
 
RascalRiley wrote:
So they all hedged their responses and bid there time. Who will be the winners? Eighty year old rich men.


You are missing the point, pal. NONE of them committed on Roe. Nor should they have, and they gave excellent explanations why they would NOT commit on it. But the real point is that you have been seriously mistaken in claiming they 'lied under oath.' So which is it? Were you lying or were you just extremely ignorant and repeating what you heard on solid trustworthy dependable CNN?

Reply
May 6, 2022 21:51:07   #
RandyBrian Loc: Texas
 
RascalRiley wrote:
But MAGA will get to use it 2025 without having to endure any political pain.


Please explain. Is it your contention that if the Democrats build and install an unConstitutional political weapon, then the Republicans are the bad guys if they use it in three years? Is that what you are implying?

Reply
 
 
May 6, 2022 22:05:56   #
Justice101
 
RascalRiley wrote:
Think about how much fun the GQP can have with this in 2025. Everything left of the Federalist can be shut down and only MAGA ideas will be allowed. Be patient.


Tit for tat and more of that! Is that where you're heading Rascal? The America First Republicans have respect for the 1st Amendment, while the DemSocialists (aka lefties and loonies) have no respect for the US Constitution unless they can corrupt and twist it for their hunger to remain in power by all means necessary.

Reply
May 6, 2022 22:11:09   #
RascalRiley Loc: Somewhere south of Detroit
 
RandyBrian wrote:
You are missing the point, pal. NONE of them committed on Roe. Nor should they have, and they gave excellent explanations why they would NOT commit on it. But the real point is that you have been seriously mistaken in claiming they 'lied under oath.' So which is it? Were you lying or were you just extremely ignorant and repeating what you heard on solid trustworthy dependable CNN?
It would appear that they covered their butts.

https://www.theblaze.com/news/mike-lees-schools-democrats-legal-prece?utm_source=theblaze-dailyPM&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Daily-Newsletter__PM%202022-05-06&utm_term=ACTIVE%20LIST%20-%20TheBlaze%20Daily%20PM

Did they mislead Senators for support? Possibly.

Reply
May 6, 2022 22:29:21   #
RascalRiley Loc: Somewhere south of Detroit
 
Justice101 wrote:
Tit for tat and more of that! Is that where you're heading Rascal? The America First Republicans have respect for the 1st Amendment, while the DemSocialists (aka lefties and loonies) have no respect for the US Constitution unless they can corrupt and twist it for their hunger to remain in power by all means necessary.
MAGA will shut down the corrupt, twisting, power hunger MSM.

Reply
May 6, 2022 23:12:25   #
RandyBrian Loc: Texas
 


Rascal, if ANY potential judge for ANY position stated how they would vote on an issue, that would obviously make them unfit to BE a judge, regardless of party. If you consider that 'covering their butts', then I can live with that. I call it understanding what a judge is supposed to do, and doing it professionally.

Reply
 
 
May 6, 2022 23:15:43   #
RandyBrian Loc: Texas
 
RascalRiley wrote:
MAGA will shut down the corrupt, twisting, power hunger MSM.


No we will not. We will simply let the people have all the facts and make their own judgments. It's working even as we write on this site. How are CNN and MSNBC ratings doing? How many subscribers does The Gray Lady have left?

Reply
May 6, 2022 23:24:23   #
RascalRiley Loc: Somewhere south of Detroit
 
RandyBrian wrote:
No we will not. We will simply let the people have all the facts and make their own judgments. It's working even as we write on this site. How are CNN and MSNBC ratings doing? How many subscribers does The Gray Lady have left?
As compared to Carlson and Hannity. Not good.

Reply
May 7, 2022 00:08:56   #
RandyBrian Loc: Texas
 
RascalRiley wrote:
As compared to Carlson and Hannity. Not good.


As compared to Three Stooges reruns, not good!

Reply
May 7, 2022 06:24:03   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
RascalRiley wrote:
I am sick of this too.


Glad to read it…. So lets all try keeping it real rather than acquiescing to the government cohorts and their media lying enablers… The only way to truly combat it is to call it out every single time and I don’t care if it’s from the left or the right and especially the lying media!

Reply
 
 
May 7, 2022 07:09:19   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
RascalRiley wrote:
As goes the USA, so goes Canada. Republicans have already pumped millions into the Canadian rebels efforts to overthrow Parliament. The Freedom Convoy was bankrolled by American Republicans.


You’re repeating media bantor with no evidence other than assumption…

https://www.npr.org/2022/02/19/1081987391/the-funding-behind-freedom-convoy-protests

How about this bit of information?? Not relevant???
Action4Canada is a grassroots movement reaching out to millions of Canadians and UNITING our voices in opposition to the destructive policies tearing at the fabric of this nation. Through Call To ACTION campaigns, we equip citizens to take action.
We are committed to protecting… FAITH, FAMILY and FREEDOM.
A Message from Tanya Gaw, Founder of Action4Canada

Statement of Claim Filed! Legal action against the Government officially commenced!

Action4Canada has commenced legal action against the BC and federal government. We have retained Rocco Galati, a top constitutional lawyer, who is willing to take on the defence of our Charter Rights and Freedoms in response to the extreme and destructive emergency measures and Bill 19.
Please support Action4Canada as we continue our work in defending

https://truthout.org/articles/convoy-movement-isnt-a-struggle-over-freedom-its-an-attempt-to-kill-democracy/


And who is action4canada???

https://action4canada.com/

Reply
May 7, 2022 07:19:02   #
Rose42
 
RascalRiley wrote:
As goes the USA, so goes Canada. Republicans have already pumped millions into the Canadian rebels efforts to overthrow Parliament. The Freedom Convoy was bankrolled by American Republicans.


You’re an easy target for propaganda. Very easy. Is that why you promote division in the US?

Reply
May 7, 2022 11:01:48   #
amadjuster Loc: Texas Panhandle
 
RascalRiley wrote:
Think about how much fun the GQP can have with this in 2025. Everything left of the Federalist can be shut down and only MAGA ideas will be allowed. Be patient.


What is the GQP?

Reply
May 7, 2022 11:07:53   #
microphor Loc: Home is TN
 
Bevvy wrote:
Joe Biden entered the senate in 1973, the same year the Supreme Court legalized abortion in its Roe v. Wade decision. He has evolved from being strongly pro-life to rabidly pro-abortion. Here is a list of his changing positions.

1974: A year after Roe v. Wade was decided, he said the ruling had gone “too far” and that a woman seeking an abortion should not have the “sole right to say what should happen to her body.”

1976: He votes for the “Hyde Amendment” which bans federal funding of abortions.

1981: He introduces the “Biden Amendment” which prohibits foreign-aid funding of biomedical research involving abortion.

1982: He votes for a constitutional amendment allowing states to overturn Roe v. Wade.

1983: He votes against a constitutional amendment allowing states to overturn Roe v. Wade.

1984: He votes for the Mexico City Policy which bans federal funding for abortions.

1987: He becomes chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee and leads the fight against Supreme Court nominee Judge Robert Bork, whom he said was opposed to Roe v. Wade.

1994: He says, “Those of us who are opposed to abortion should not be compelled to pay for them.”

1995: He votes to ban partial-birth abortion.

1997: He votes to ban partial-birth abortion.

2003: He votes to ban partial-birth abortion

2007: He criticizes the Supreme Court decision upholding the ban on partial-birth abortion, calling it “paternalistic.”

2008: He says he is opposed to overturning Roe v. Wade.

2012: He says the government does not have “a right to tell other people that women, they can’t control their body.”

2019: He says he is opposed to the “Hyde Amendment” which bans the federal funding of abortion. Yet , he had voted FOR this bill in 1976

2020: He says he supports abortion “under any circumstances.”

There is no one in public life who has undergone such a dramatic transformation. He did not change because of science: it did not change its position on when life begins. It was Biden who changed, and he did so for totally political reasons.
Joe Biden entered the senate in 1973, the same yea... (show quote)


My favorite go to-the facts!

Reply
Page <<first <prev 7 of 19 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.