Is it ok for a Supreme Court Nominee to lie in order to get appointed? Should they be removed? (Page 5): Why don't you worry about your own screwed up country? Your opinion means...

amadjuster Loc: Texas Panhandle

RascalRiley wrote:

And given the lack of appetite to hold anyone accountable it is unlikely that the Union will hold. A republican Handmaidens utopia would be hell for the majority.

Same sex marriage, interracial marriage and prohibiting birth control are now republicans talking points.

Why don't you worry about your own screwed up country? Your opinion means diddly here.

RascalRiley Loc: Somewhere south of Detroit

Justice101 wrote:

2 justices on the Supreme Court have interracial marriages: 1 conservative and 1 activist liberal. Not a talking point.

Republican officials are suggesting all of that and probably more Christian control. Nothing is off the table anymore.

RascalRiley Loc: Somewhere south of Detroit

amadjuster wrote:

What does a Canadian have to do with this?

As goes the USA, so goes Canada. Republicans have already pumped millions into the Canadian rebels efforts to overthrow Parliament. The Freedom Convoy was bankrolled by American Republicans.

RandyBrian Loc: Texas

RascalRiley wrote:

And given the lack of appetite to hold anyone accountable it is unlikely that the Union will hold. A republican Handmaidens utopia would be hell for the majority.

Same sex marriage, interracial marriage and prohibiting birth control are now republicans talking points.

Ah. Are you now admitting that abortion is primarily birth control? It is, you know. There is no such thing as same sex marriage, no matter what the government says. They might as well pass a law giving all Americans the title of 'Christian'. Giving it the same name does not make it the same thing. Personally, I know more Democrats who oppose interracial relationships than Republicans. Maybe it is different up north. Texans seem to have more sense about such things.

Elrond51 Loc: New Mexico

Blade_Runner wrote:

FYI: Roe v Wade is a SCOTUS ruling, it is not a law passed by congress and signed by POTUS.

There are three way to overturn a SCOTUS decision.
* Congressional Statute (pass a law),
* Constitutional Amendment,
* or, SCOTUS. (Incidentally, SCOTUS has overturned over 200 of its own rulings.)
*Moreover, since congress has, in the past, changed, altered, repealed or replaced existing statutes,
there is no such thing as "settled law".

Then no one should use the term, even SCOTUS members or appointees.

Justice101

RascalRiley wrote:

Republican officials are suggesting all of that and probably more Christian control. Nothing is off the table anymore.

Please post your source of information (besides Rawstory) Thanks.

RascalRiley Loc: Somewhere south of Detroit

RandyBrian wrote:

Ah. Are you now admitting that abortion is primarily birth control? It is, you know. There is no such thing as same sex marriage, no matter what the government says. They might as well pass a law giving all Americans the title of 'Christian'. Giving it the same name does not make it the same thing. Personally, I know more Democrats who oppose interracial relationships than Republicans. Maybe it is different up north. Texans seem to have more sense about such things.

If interracial marriage is frowned upon by Texas democrats the USA is on a dark journey.

RascalRiley Loc: Somewhere south of Detroit

Justice101 wrote:

Please post your source of information (besides Rawstory) Thanks.

Google it. Or ignore it. If you have to ask for sources we are not on the same page.

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

RascalRiley wrote:

They indicated that they would not change it. It was settled. They lied under oath.

Once again you give false information…You’re listening to pelosi and schummer who are the real liars….

From the justices themselves~~

https://www.npr.org/2022/05/03/1096108319/roe-v-wade-alito-conservative-justices-confirmation-hearings

RascalRiley Loc: Somewhere south of Detroit

lindajoy wrote:

Once again you give false information…You’re listening to pelosi and schummer who are the real liars….

From the justices themselves~~

https://www.npr.org/2022/05/03/1096108319/roe-v-wade-alito-conservative-justices-confirmation-hearings

So they all hedged their responses and bid there time. Who will be the winners? Eighty year old rich men.

federally indicted mattoid

Blade_Runner wrote:

What, exactly, was settled?

Roe v Wade

How thick are you?

federally indicted mattoid

RascalRiley wrote:

And given the lack of appetite to hold anyone accountable it is unlikely that the Union will hold. A republican Handmaidens utopia would be hell for the majority.

Same sex marriage, interracial marriage and prohibiting birth control are now republicans talking points.

Bad scenario. But nutjobs are loud and bold.

federally indicted mattoid

lindajoy wrote:

Once again you give false information…You’re listening to pelosi and schummer who are the real liars….

From the justices themselves~~

https://www.npr.org/2022/05/03/1096108319/roe-v-wade-alito-conservative-justices-confirmation-hearings

Many people listened to the justices. Horse's mouth, so to speak.

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

RascalRiley wrote:

So they all hedged their responses and bid there time. Who will be the winners? Eighty year old rich men.

Changing your allegations now does not dismiss you spoke out of turn!!

Isn’t it enough we have enough damn people lying their ass off about things that we must join them diminishing our own self-worth??? Aren’t you sick of that yet I know I am!

RascalRiley Loc: Somewhere south of Detroit

lindajoy wrote:

Changing your allegations now does not dismiss you spoke out of turn!!

Isn’t it enough we have enough damn people lying their ass off about things that we must join them diminishing our own self-worth??? Aren’t you sick of that yet I know I am!

I am sick of this too.