Is it ok for a Supreme Court Nominee to lie in order to get appointed? Should they be removed? (Page 4): Roe vs Wade be damned. It was always invented. It was crimes against humanity...

Carol Kelly

Liberty Tree wrote:

How did they lie? At the time they answered the quesion Roe V. Wade was settled law, but that does not mean it cannot ever be changed.

Roe vs Wade be damned. It was always invented. It was crimes against humanity just as the Holocaust was. Made murderers of all taxpayers. I resented that, don’t know about you, but probably.

RandyBrian Loc: Texas

RascalRiley wrote:

They indicated that they would not change it. It was settled. They lied under oath.

I disagree, RR. If you want an example of lying under oath, look at Biden taking his Oath of Office.

RascalRiley Loc: Somewhere south of Detroit

RandyBrian wrote:

I disagree, RR. If you want an example of lying under oath, look at Biden taking his Oath of Office.

The Oath of Office is a joke on both sides of the aisle.

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

RascalRiley wrote:

The Oath of Office is a joke on both sides of the aisle.

Article II, Section 1, para 9, US Constitution.

Oscar louks

RascalRiley wrote:

The Oath of Office is a joke on both sides of the aisle.

Corruption runs this country

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

RascalRiley wrote:

They indicated that they would not change it. It was settled. They lied under oath.

What, exactly, was settled?

RascalRiley Loc: Somewhere south of Detroit

Oscar louks wrote:

Corruption runs this country

Same in Canada.

RascalRiley Loc: Somewhere south of Detroit

Blade_Runner wrote:

What, exactly, was settled?

The topic at hand.

Elrond51 Loc: New Mexico

Liberty Tree wrote:

How did they lie? At the time they answered the quesion Roe V. Wade was settled law, but that does not mean it cannot ever be changed.

It was settled law until THEY decided to unsettle it.
There is not a likely path to do anything except wait for them to resign, retire or bite the dust. And given the lack of appetite to hold anyone accountable, the lying under oath will probably not be an avenue either.

RascalRiley Loc: Somewhere south of Detroit

Elrond51 wrote:

It was settled law until THEY decided to unsettle it.
There is not a likely path to do anything except wait for them to resign, retire or bite the dust. And given the lack of appetite to hold anyone accountable, the lying under oath will probably not be an avenue either.

And given the lack of appetite to hold anyone accountable it is unlikely that the Union will hold. A republican Handmaidens utopia would be hell for the majority.

Same sex marriage, interracial marriage and prohibiting birth control are now republicans talking points.

Elrond51 Loc: New Mexico

RascalRiley wrote:

And given the lack of appetite to hold anyone accountable it is unlikely that the Union will hold. A republican Handmaidens utopia would be hell for the majority.

Same sex marriage, interracial marriage and prohibiting birth control are now republicans talking points.

Yep

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

336Robin wrote:

It's obvious that several of them lied to get themselves appointed and passed.

Should we remove them for a breach of oral contract?

I would certainly fire an employee who lied to me to get the job. Wouldn't you?

If you have any hope of salvaging the vagaries and ambiguity in this accusation, you'll need to do a number of things.

* Name the SCOTUS appointees you accuse of lying,
* Explain the lies,
* Justify the vicious attempts at character assassination by democrat run committees,
* and, take into account the paradigm shift in American politics when the Covid pandemic struck,
and when FJB was escorted into the White House.
(Together, these two events caused a quantum leap in the political and cultural division in our country).

* Finally, convince us you have never told a lie.

Do that, or remain a cognitively dysfunctional troll.

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

Elrond51 wrote:

It was settled law until THEY decided to unsettle it.
There is not a likely path to do anything except wait for them to resign, retire or bite the dust. And given the lack of appetite to hold anyone accountable, the lying under oath will probably not be an avenue either.

FYI: Roe v Wade is a SCOTUS ruling, it is not a law passed by congress and signed by POTUS.

There are three way to overturn a SCOTUS decision.
* Congressional Statute (pass a law),
* Constitutional Amendment,
* or, SCOTUS. (Incidentally, SCOTUS has overturned over 200 of its own rulings.)
*Moreover, since congress has, in the past, changed, altered, repealed or replaced existing statutes,
there is no such thing as "settled law".

Justice101

RascalRiley wrote:

And given the lack of appetite to hold anyone accountable it is unlikely that the Union will hold. A republican Handmaidens utopia would be hell for the majority.

Same sex marriage, interracial marriage and prohibiting birth control are now republicans talking points.

2 justices on the Supreme Court have interracial marriages: 1 conservative and 1 activist liberal. Not a talking point.

amadjuster Loc: Texas Panhandle

RascalRiley wrote:

They indicated that they would not change it. It was settled. They lied under oath.

What does a Canadian have to do with this?