One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
U.S. Republican Marjorie Taylor Greene not sure whether she advocates violence
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
Apr 24, 2022 02:08:59   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
RascalRiley wrote:
I do not see a problem. It is saying what I intended. If you can not grasp the meaning is a difference in cultures.


You cannot see a problem because you lack grammar skills. This is not a difference in cultures, but in intelligence.

Reply
Apr 24, 2022 02:28:03   #
Jlw Loc: Wisconsin
 
kemmer wrote:
Greene’s entire litany while on the stand yesterday was an hours long recitation of, “I don’t recall.” Apart from a few whopper lies.
She should be in jail today for blatant and repetitive perjury.


What about your queen hitlery?

Reply
Apr 24, 2022 07:13:30   #
Michael10
 
amadjuster wrote:
You should really work on your grammar skills.


You should really work on your reasoning skills because if you call yourself freedom loving and are a trump backer they are in direct conflict with the ability to make a sane decision.

Reply
 
 
Apr 24, 2022 07:15:53   #
Michael10
 
Jlw wrote:
What about your queen hitlery?


What about her, she set in front of congress and answered questions with reasonable answers, something NO republican has done since the 6th.

Reply
Apr 24, 2022 07:16:30   #
RascalRiley Loc: Somewhere south of Detroit
 
Michael10 wrote:
You should really work on your reasoning skills because if you call yourself freedom loving and are a trump backer they are in direct conflict with the ability to make a sane decision.


Reply
Apr 24, 2022 10:00:36   #
jimpack123 Loc: wisconsin
 
microphor wrote:
I didn't see it but if what you post is correct, sounds like this Republican is taking some pointers from the Democrat playbook and you don't like it!


sounds like she taking pointers from 45 lol

Reply
Apr 24, 2022 11:39:52   #
kemmer
 
Jlw wrote:
What about your queen hitlery?

Trey Gowdy and the Republican lynch mob tried for 2 1/2 years and untold millions of $$ trying to pin Benghazi on Hillary and failed.

Reply
 
 
Apr 24, 2022 12:33:08   #
microphor Loc: Home is TN
 
Michael10 wrote:
Clinton sit in front of congress for hours and answered questions with defendable answers, the GOP as a whole has taken a rain check on truth cause the piper is piping for trump and his ilk and you guys gonna be eating a lot of crow. Or you'll just continue in your sad condition of denial and sulk away into obscurity. Anything else will be the death of this country and the freedoms it was built on.


Here ya go, if you want to read the rest, look it up yourself:

When she was questioned by the FBI on July 2, Hillary Clinton “did not recall” any conversations she had about setting up her controversial private email server after becoming secretary of state.

She “could not recall” anybody raising any concerns with her about it.

Shown a cable that went out under her name, warning all State Department employees about security threats to their personal email accounts — and advising them not to use them for official business — Clinton drew a blank. She replied that all policy cables carried her name and “she did not recall this specific cable.”

So it went during her three-and-a-half-hour grilling, according to an official FBI report on Clinton’s interview that was made public by the bureau on Friday. During the course of her interview, Clinton was repeatedly unable to respond to many questions about her use of the private email server and the classified emails she sent on it. She said she “could not recall,” “did not recall” and “did not remember” 38 times, according to a Yahoo News tally of her responses recorded in the 11-page FBI report.

Reply
Apr 24, 2022 14:15:01   #
Old Thinker
 
woodguru wrote:
There is a cognitive disconnect there...technically, meanwhile the constant posing with guns, and ranting about using 2nd amendment remedies to take the country back, and removing people from office...

then there was the gotchya moment where she posted that Pelosi needed to be hung for treason, or the we know what we do with traitors.

There is a non stop call to arms, taking care of business, removing people from office by other means besides the legal ones that aren't happening. It's a constant threat of violence by pissed off people, this is how autocrats and dictators thrive, when people support their undemocratic solutions that involve intimidation and terrorism.
There is a cognitive disconnect there...technicall... (show quote)


You are so lost, there isn't one thing you mentioned that isn't covered by the first amendment.

Reply
Apr 24, 2022 14:59:11   #
amadjuster Loc: Texas Panhandle
 
Michael10 wrote:
You should really work on your reasoning skills because if you call yourself freedom loving and are a trump backer they are in direct conflict with the ability to make a sane decision.


Reasoning comes with education and experience. What I was trying to read would grade out as a D in English. Apparently you majored in something like Underwater Lesbian Basketweaving and did not have to put words together to make a sentance. Culture has nothing to do with ignorance.

Reply
Apr 24, 2022 15:34:20   #
Michael10
 
amadjuster wrote:
Reasoning comes with education and experience. What I was trying to read would grade out as a D in English. Apparently you majored in something like Underwater Lesbian Basketweaving and did not have to put words together to make a sentance. Culture has nothing to do with ignorance.


Once again you lower yourself to insults when there's no real answer to the original post. You guys are as lost as a ball in high weeds.

Reply
 
 
Apr 24, 2022 15:36:08   #
RascalRiley Loc: Somewhere south of Detroit
 
amadjuster wrote:
Reasoning comes with education and experience. What I was trying to read would grade out as a D in English. Apparently you majored in something like Underwater Lesbian Basketweaving and did not have to put words together to make a sentance. Culture has nothing to do with ignorance.

Attach the messenger? I know we think each other clueless but the topic is rigging elections. New laws are being made solely to insure election integrity.

Reply
Apr 24, 2022 16:21:12   #
okie don
 
woodguru wrote:
She sounded like the retarded dunce that was the class clown.


Well, she doesn't chuckle everytime she's asked a question.

Reply
Apr 24, 2022 17:22:39   #
Michael10
 
okie don wrote:
Well, she doesn't chuckle everytime she's asked a question.


Yea, that's so horrible to chuckle and show any emotion except contempt like pretty much any Republican in office.

Reply
Apr 25, 2022 16:57:13   #
DamnYANKEE
 
Michael10 wrote:
Apparently she's not sure she took an oath to support and defend the constitution either.



Jan Wolfe
Fri, April 22, 2022, 5:06 AM
By Jan Wolfe

(Reuters) -Republican U.S. Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene on Friday told a lawyer for voters seeking to disqualify her from running for re-election that she did not know how to answer a question about whether she advocates violence against people with whom she disagrees.

Greene testified in a Georgia state court in Atlanta in a novel legal challenge to her candidacy accusing her of violating a U.S. Constitution provision called the "Insurrectionist Disqualification Clause" by supporting an incendiary rally that preceded last year's attack on the U.S. Capitol.

Andrew Celli, a lawyer for the voters, asked Greene during the hearing before administrative law judge Charles Beaudrot whether she has advocates political violence against people with whom she disagrees.

"I don't think so," Greene replied. "I don't know how to answer that."

Greene is a prominent supporter of former President Donald Trump. In comments to the media, she has downplayed and justified the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol assault by Trump supporters in their failed bid to block congressional certification of President Joe Biden's 2020 election victory.

Trump at the preceding rally told his supporters to march to the Capitol and "fight like hell," repeating his false claims that the election was stolen through widespread voter fraud. The Trump supporters attacked police, ransacked parts of the Capitol and send lawmakers into hiding for their own safety.

"I was asking people to come for a peaceful march, which everyone is entitled to do," Greene told the hearing. "I was not asking them to actively engage in violence."

The constitutional clause, added after the U.S. Civil War of the 1860s, prohibits politicians from running for Congress if they have engaged in "insurrection or rebellion" or "given aid or comfort" to the nation's enemies.

Greene, who represents a Georgia district in the U.S. House of Representatives, is seeking re-election this year, with the Republican primary scheduled on May 24 and the general election on Nov. 8.

Celli also questioned Greene about a video she recorded in 2019, before she took office, calling U.S. House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi a "traitor." Greene at first denied making the statement, but then admitted to it under questioning by the Celli and the judge.

Greene's lawyer argued that the statement was "hyperbole" and irrelevant to the case.

The voter challenge is being spearheaded by a group called Free Speech for People that advocates for campaign finance reform. A similar challenge backed by the same group against Republican U.S. Representative Madison Cawthorn failed when a federal judge in North Carolina dismissed that suit on March 4.

Ron Fein, a lawyer for the voters seeking Greene's disqualification, said in his opening remarks that the congresswoman played an "important role" in instigating the attack on the U.S. Capitol.

"In some cases, the mask falls and she shows us exactly what she intended," Fein said.

Greene's lawyer, James Bopp, argued during his opening remarks that removing her from the ballot would be both unfair to her and to voters in her conservative-leaning district. Greene is expected to appeal any ruling against her, and has already brought parallel litigation in U.S. federal court seeking to halt the administrative proceeding.

In a recent court filing, Greene's lawyers said she "vigorously denies that she aided and engaged in insurrection to obstruct the peaceful transfer of presidential power."

"Fundamentally, First Amendment rights are at stake, not only the right to vote, as I've mentioned, or the right to run for office," Bopp said during the hearing, referring to the Constitution's free speech protections.
Apparently she's not sure she took an oath to supp... (show quote)


NWR ON

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.