Big Kahuna

A sick military is what the toxic Wuhan jab is giving us. After weeding out the smart military personnel who refuse the jab we are left with a bunch of sick and gender confused who would jump off the Golden Gate bridge if told to do so. Tictoc is like slo Joe who in 50 years has never been right about anything and you are following in his footsteps. Good hearing from you Perm, I thought you may have gone in for gender transitioning surgery.

Big Kahuna

Thanks Logically Right, you are also 100% right in your assessment in forcing our military personnel to take the toxic jab which neither prevents you from getting the virus nor keeps you from passing it on. What the hell good is it other than to destroy a persons good health. Have you seen all the possible side effects from this toxic jab? The list is endless.

Big Kahuna

Following this reasoning, I guess the German soldiers should have continued gassing and exterminating the Jews. They were just following orders. You would have made a great Nazi.

Big Kahuna

The toxic jab causes a 75% chance of a pregnant woman miscarriaging in her 1st trimester. Think of all the shed tears and grief and you support this bs. What about all the airline pilots and young athletes having cardiomyopathies, blood clots and reported deaths. And you support all this bs? You fools are insane. Go ahead and take the jabs with 6 boosters, I'll wait and observe your deaths shortly. Big Kahuna is too smart and values his health too much to digest the Governments toxic KoolAid. I thought you fools would have learned this after the Tuskeegee incident and the Government funded Jim Jones fiasco.

Holdenbeach4u Loc: Holden Beach , NC

Sooner or later :
The Military will bring back the Draft doing Biden administration. My opinion be the biggest mistake ever !

microphor Loc: Home is TN

The problem is the vax mandate, not the soldiers or their superiors. We are using our military as a control group for these vaccines

FallenOak Loc: St George Utah

Here is a list of the Supreme Court Justices. As you can see there is only one left from the last century. Only 22 years ago. Times change whether we want them to or not. Four of the nine have been seated within the last five years.

John G. Roberts, Jr., Chief Justice of the United States, 29 September 2005
Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice, 23 October 1991
Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Associate Justice, 31 January2006
Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice, 26 May 2009
Elena Kagan, Associate Justice, 7 August2010
Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice, 10 April 2017
Brett M. Kavanaugh, Associate Justice, 6 October 2018
Amy Coney Barrett, Associate Justice, 27 October2020
Ketanji Brown Jackson, Associate Justice, 7 April 2022

As I have lived over the last four score plus years I have seen after I became old enough to care that Presidents nominate people who they believe will vote as they do but I have noticed that is not always true.
I have also watched as we have, I believe, voted into office those persons not of the higher standards of honor since 2000. Having a President with obvious signs of Dementia (my opinion after watching friends acting in similar manner) nominating anyone to any office leave me suspect of the nominee as being best qualified.

Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX

The military never has to follow an unlawful order. That's true too. And no one has to take an experimental unapproved jab. And we have the right to know what's in it and are supposed to by law, be given a list by medical personnel if we ask for it? And we also have a right to due consideration of any religious objections. The Lefties in the Pentagon didn't like that especially, Gen. Milley for some reason? And neither did Slo-Joe.

It's why I posted a report of airmen at Lackland dying from the jab. Not my fault you're uninformed and ignorant. Ignorant doesn't mean stupid, just uninformed. Not doing any research on your own, might qualify as stupid. Your welcome.

Tiptop789 Loc: State of Denial

They disobeyed a direct order. The vaccinations aren't experimental nor are they deadly as you claim.

Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX

Your wrong, that's your opinion. And your welcome to it. Post me a link showing it was approved and I'll read it.

Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois

The vaccinations were approved under the name Comaraty. It is not available in the U.S.

They are still administering vaccines under the EAU which are considered experimental.

Look it up Ticktock.

woodguru

Who says they were good soldiers? I've been in the military, was very aware of extremely racist people, and the fact is they were not that good as soldiers, they had bad attitudes, disciplinary problems, and often were not wanted in terms of reenlistment options. They make better lower echelon soldiers, where a bad attitude can be a good thing.

At this point those who buy into the anti vaccine thing are not what the military wants, we can do without the MAGA oriented scum, which happens to be the majority of them.

woodguru

Nobody has ever tied a link to how vaccines violate anybody's religious beliefs...they might violate political beliefs, which the right is trying to incorporate any beliefs into the religious category...they are just short of simply calling it their beliefs, their belief being that it is their right to believe whatever they choose to believe.

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

Peewee, you have to find more then the misinformation the right wing keeps shoving at you..

https://www.kwqc.com/2022/02/02/fact-check-no-covid-19-vaccines-are-not-experimental/

Fact Check: No, the COVID-19 vaccines are not experimental

(KWQC) - Since COVID-19 vaccines hit the market, several online posts emerged stating the vaccines are experimental.

That claim is false.

In fact, more research and manpower has gone into the COVID-19 vaccines than any other.

The World Health Organization said because of the “urgent need” for COVID-19 vaccines, some of the steps in the research and development process were allowed to run at the same time. The WHO said it’s because of the unprecedented financial investments and political commitments to the vaccine that allowed it to be developed so quickly.

Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois

RE: Affidavit of Exemption on Religious Grounds from Mask / Immunization Mandates, Laws & Rules Requirements Including but not Limited to: Entry into Businesses, Medical Procedures, Domestic Travel, etc.

I, _________________, do hereby swear and affirm that I am a member of a recognized religious organization, and that the mask / immunization mandates that are required by your organization are contrary to my religious tenets and practices. On this basis, as the above referenced requirements violate my right to freely exercise my religion as guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution of The United States of America, I am asserting my rights to an exemption from your mask / immunization requirements.

Furthermore, I qualify for this exemption based on the First Amendment of the United States Constitution and 42 U.S. Code § 2000a - Prohibition against discrimination or segregation in places of public accommodation, which states “All persons shall be entitled to the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of public accommodation, as defined in this section, without discrimination or segregation on the ground of race, color, religion, or national origin.” Failure to uphold 42 U.S. Code § 2000a may be met with legal action.