Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Creationism should provide evidence if it wants to be taken seriously as a science...
Refuting Darwinism – in Seven Seconds Flat!I will demonstrate that my title on this is not a misprint.
• It can be done
• No smoke and mirrors involved
• Just scientifically-proven facts
I repeat:
Darwinism can actually be scientifically refuted in SEVEN SECONDS FLAT—or faster. I will time myself just before we finish and tell you how I did.
Three facts are key to this demonstration.
Fact Number One:The CODE BARRIER, best referred to as the DNA Code Barrier, is a scientific principle that one kind of plant or animal only has the genetic information in its gene pool to produce its own kind. Take a cow as a simple example. While there may exist the genetic data to produce a wide variety of adaptations within the cow’s particular DNA, the simple fact is that cattle only possess the genetic ability to produce other cattle.
Plants and animals can only bring forth after their kind, just as we are told ten times in the Book of Genesis. This fact is known as the DNA Code Barrier and is a major problem for Darwinian-style
evolution. The Darwinist must try to explain some way for cows to produce non-cows, and this would only be feasible if there were a method for nature to add massive amounts of new and beneficial
genetic information to an existing gene pool.
However, as of this writing, real science knows of no way for nature to add appreciable amounts of new and beneficial genetic data to one kind of a plant or animal’s DNA. The DNA Code Barrier is a huge roadblock for Darwinism.
Fact Number Two:GENE DEPLETION, also referred to as Genetic Entropy, is the scientific principal that all adaptations and/or mutations are the result of the sorting or the loss of the parents’ genetic information. In other words, adaptational variations, as well as mutational changes, are caused by the recombination or loss of the beginning genetic data which was inherited from the parents and not by the gain of new and beneficial genetic data as Neo-Darwinism falsely teaches.
Managing gene depletion is how ranchers breed cattle to best match their end-use goals. Breeders can get meatier cattle or better milk producers by breeding out traits that they do not wish their cows to have. This is done through the loss of genetic information, not by the gain of new data in the cow’s DNA. This is why the loss of genetic data is referred to as the scientific principle of Gene Depletion.
And managing this Gene Depletion, although it may produce meatier cows, will NEVER produce apes or humans.
Gene Depletion is yet another major roadblock for Darwinism, whose proponents keep insisting that humans, plants and animals are evolving better and better by the accumulation of new and beneficial genetic information being added to their gene pools, contrary to a mountain of evidence that shows that humans, plants and animals are devolving through Gene Depletion.
Fact Number Three:NATURAL SELECTION is the process scientists observe during which, in the free competition for Resources, the weaker members of a species tend to be eliminated, unable to compete with the stronger of their kind.
Now let’s put these three scientific principles together to reveal why no one has ever been able to discover any viable evidence of Darwinism having taken place.
Start your timer:
The DNA Code Barrier plus Gene Depletion plus Natural Selection makes Darwinian-style
change scientifically impossible.Stop your timer.
I got 6.4 seconds. That is how long it just took me to scientifically refute Darwinism, the foundation for Secular Humanism. And I was not talking fast like I sometimes do.
Why don't you read your bible canuckus.