Demand for oil is spiking. So why are North Dakota rigs lying idle?
Bad Bob wrote:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/demand-oil-spiking-why-north-104056798.html
Coming from you BB I am surprised. This was my biggest fear at the outcome of the last election..
Tiptop789 wrote:
Give it a break park bench. Can you only count to three? What a totally disgusting comment.
When someone posts a hot link to an article, it is possible and very easy to click on the link and read the article in order to find out what's being said.
That way, if you feel it necessary to respond, you will be informed and can offer an intelligent response.
Failing to do so and instead, launching an attack on another member because of his or her comments is just a thoughtless emotional reaction.
Parky quoted from the article Bad Bob posted,
he even made note of that in his post.
Considering your inability to comprehend the written word, it is probably just as well you didn't click the link and read.
Biden finally woke up concerning Shale Oil Production on Federal Lands. He said will started back up drilling more oil and try get the energy cost down!
Wonttakeitanymore wrote:
Because of ur fake president!
What's fake about him? He got more votes, he is the president.
Blade_Runner wrote:
When someone posts a hot link to an article, it is possible and very easy to click on the link and read the article in order to find out what's being said.
That way, if you feel it necessary to respond, you will be informed and can offer an intelligent response.
Failing to do so and instead, launching an attack on another member because of his or her comments is just a thoughtless emotional reaction.
Parky quoted from the article Bad Bob posted,
he even made note of that in his post.
Considering your inability to comprehend the written word, it is probably just as well you didn't click the link and read.
When someone posts a hot link to an article, it is... (
show quote)
Oh BR, they're you go again. I can reed just fine.
Parky60
Loc: People's Republic of Illinois
Tiptop789 wrote:
Oh BR, they're you go again. I can reed just fine.
How can you "reed" just fine if you can't spell? I guess that explains your shitty reading comprehension.
Parky60 wrote:
How can you "reed" just fine if you can't spell? I guess that explains your shitty reading comprehension.
When they’re called out they try to play it off with ‘witty banter’ but it backfires on them, then they run away only to show their mental deficiencies on other topics to the rest of us here on OPP.
woodguru wrote:
The industry has thousands of drilled wells that need to be taken to completion, meaning investments made in pumps and pumping infrastructure, one of the companies has several thousand and they defend their choice to invest profits in buybacks rather than pumping.
They are making an intentional decision to make more with less, they call it quality over quantity. What that means is profits over volume. From a business standpoint why not make more money producing less if nobody stops you from doing it?
The industry has thousands of drilled wells that n... (
show quote)
You say this while stealing our money. We have What-a-Burger and now we have What-a-Dipstick!
Peewee wrote:
You say this while stealing our money. We have What-a-Burger and now we have What-a-Dipstick!
With no measurable brain to register, FJB !!
iFrank wrote:
When they’re called out they try to play it off with ‘witty banter’ but it backfires on them, then they run away only to show their mental deficiencies on other topics to the rest of us here on OPP.
Once Musk tanks Twitter, free speech will return. Because it's their biggest bullhorn. They censored the POTUS. Either way, Twitter moves they'll lose. So do stockholders lose, they voted for Musk, and the board has no control over stockholders. So do they burn Twitter to the ground to protect their algorithms? Life is all about choices. Now Musk can choose to buy more stock and he doesn't have to be shy now. If he chooses, he can go all in now with a hostile takeover. He just has to make sure it lands in the right court and with the right judge, easier said than done. Or catching Judges who rule opposite of our Constitution may be the real goal and we bag more swamp critters/traitors and give them a one-way free ride to GITMO?
Peewee wrote:
Once Musk tanks Twitter, free speech will return. Because it's their biggest bullhorn. They censored the POTUS. Either way, Twitter moves they'll lose. So do stockholders lose, they voted for Musk, and the board has no control over stockholders. So do they burn Twitter to the ground to protect their algorithms? Life is all about choices. Now Musk can choose to buy more stock and he doesn't have to be shy now. If he chooses, he can go all in now with a hostile takeover. He just has to make sure it lands in the right court and with the right judge, easier said than done. Or catching Judges who rule opposite of our Constitution may be the real goal and we bag more swamp critters/traitors and give them a one-way free ride to GITMO?
Once Musk tanks Twitter, free speech will return. ... (
show quote)
My wife and I don’t have any social media accounts, when Musk takes control of twitter we’ll consider it. Until then just keep your eyes on the Lord, He’s more important then anything in this world. Alleluia and hallelujah, Amen.
woodguru wrote:
The industry has thousands of drilled wells that need to be taken to completion, meaning investments made in pumps and pumping infrastructure, one of the companies has several thousand and they defend their choice to invest profits in buybacks rather than pumping.
They are making an intentional decision to make more with less, they call it quality over quantity. What that means is profits over volume. From a business standpoint why not make more money producing less if nobody stops you from doing it?
The industry has thousands of drilled wells that n... (
show quote)
Odd. No link. No support. Did you get this information from the same empty pit of thought that brought you to the conclusion that the southern border is securely closed to illegal aliens????
Tiptop789 wrote:
Give it a break park bench. Can you only count to three? What a totally disgusting comment.
I'll bite. Why is his comment 'totally disgusting'??
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.