So the right insists that it's the mainstream media that lies...okay fine, if that's the case let's get medieval on cracking down on the lies, let's shut that evil media down by making media prove everything they represent to the public. I'm willing to take my chances on media having to prove what they represent as a standard, if it can't be proved you can't tell it to people.
But then the right says oh no, wait a minute, who gets to say what the facts are?
What part of being able to prove that a story is the truth, if it can't be proved people don't need to hear it doesn't people understand?
The right wants to hear their lies, they want that alternate reality represented, and they basically understand that those lies are over with if a standard of weeding out the lies is implemented.
You would get very few liberals or lefties that would have a problem with making the lies go away.
Woody
If the left quit lying they wouldn’t be able to talk. Adam Shifty would melt like the wicked witch of the west. You just haven’t figured out that the liberal lefty movement is based solely on lies. Which of the 143 genders are you?
Turtle keeper wrote:
Woody
If the left quit lying they wouldn’t be able to talk. Adam Shifty would melt like the wicked witch of the west. You just haven’t figured out that the liberal lefty movement is based solely on lies. Which of the 143 genders are you?
He knows it. He doesn't care. He's a complete waste of time and a troll. IMO we should never respond to this attention seeking fake.
Make the media accountable when they get caught lying
Turtle keeper wrote:
Woody
If the left quit lying they wouldn’t be able to talk. Adam Shifty would melt like the wicked witch of the west. You just haven’t figured out that the liberal lefty movement is based solely on lies. Which of the 143 genders are you?
One fact you refuse to admit... the mission statement and job description of most of the alt-media the right wing follows is not to report news but rather to promote a political position , the right wing drivel..
woodguru wrote:
So the right insists that it's the mainstream media that lies...okay fine, if that's the case let's get medieval on cracking down on the lies, let's shut that evil media down by making media prove everything they represent to the public. I'm willing to take my chances on media having to prove what they represent as a standard, if it can't be proved you can't tell it to people.
But then the right says oh no, wait a minute, who gets to say what the facts are?
What part of being able to prove that a story is the truth, if it can't be proved people don't need to hear it doesn't people understand?
The right wants to hear their lies, they want that alternate reality represented, and they basically understand that those lies are over with if a standard of weeding out the lies is implemented.
You would get very few liberals or lefties that would have a problem with making the lies go away.
So the right insists that it's the mainstream medi... (
show quote)
Now: Apply that standard to your very own Steele Fraud.
Turtle keeper wrote:
Woody
If the left quit lying they wouldn’t be able to talk. Adam Shifty would melt like the wicked witch of the west. You just haven’t figured out that the liberal lefty movement is based solely on lies. Which of the 143 genders are you?
I'm willing to lose everything they are lying about that can't be proved along with everything the right lies about, put it this way, there would be no more Tucker Carlson or Hannity, they do not traffic in proven statements, only rhetoric and what people want to believe.
JFlorio wrote:
He knows it. He doesn't care. He's a complete waste of time and a troll. IMO we should never respond to this attention seeking fake.
Any talk of eliminating lies from the internet is hailed as an affront to the freedom of speech, we are talking about eliminating everything that can't be proved...
and you know we are talking about right wing unsubstantiated theories.
Bevvy wrote:
Make the media accountable when they get caught lying
Exactly, major fines for lies, and losing their media broadcast licenses...being forced to retract and cover the truth as can be verified.
Truth in media laws would be no different than truth in advertising laws for manufacturers, they can't claim something that they can't prove.
We would have a different world if a major network has a standard of proof for stories...make them sit on a story until they get the proof.
Gatsby wrote:
Now: Apply that standard to your very own Steele Fraud.
As that thing was broken down the majority has been substantiated, the right clings to things that can't because they came from undisclosed or classified sources.
The right likes to go to a standard of if you can't prove it happened that's a lie until the burden of proof is on their horse crap, then it's you can't prove it didn't happen so it must have.
That right there is a completely irrelevant if not disingenuous lie
permafrost wrote:
One fact you refuse to admit... the mission statement and job description of most of the alt-media the right wing follows is not to report news but rather to promote a political position , the right wing drivel..
LOL
Your post is a hoot since you are a proven liar.
CLPOS
woodguru wrote:
As that thing was broken down the majority has been substantiated, the right clings to things that can't because they came from undisclosed or classified sources.
The right likes to go to a standard of if you can't prove it happened that's a lie until the burden of proof is on their horse crap, then it's you can't prove it didn't happen so it must have.
That right there is a completely irrelevant if not disingenuous lie
Your "Russian Collusion Delusion" is the greatest political fraud ever perpetrated in the history of the US,
and still you keep pushing it, that makes you look really stupid.
woodguru wrote:
So the right insists that it's the mainstream media that lies...okay fine, if that's the case let's get medieval on cracking down on the lies, let's shut that evil media down by making media prove everything they represent to the public. I'm willing to take my chances on media having to prove what they represent as a standard, if it can't be proved you can't tell it to people.
But then the right says oh no, wait a minute, who gets to say what the facts are?
What part of being able to prove that a story is the truth, if it can't be proved people don't need to hear it doesn't people understand?
The right wants to hear their lies, they want that alternate reality represented, and they basically understand that those lies are over with if a standard of weeding out the lies is implemented.
You would get very few liberals or lefties that would have a problem with making the lies go away.
So the right insists that it's the mainstream medi... (
show quote)
**You would get very few liberals or lefties that would have a problem with making the lies go away.
>>>Do you really believe that?
woodguru wrote:
I'm willing to lose everything they are lying about that can't be proved along with everything the right lies about, put it this way, there would be no more Tucker Carlson or Hannity, they do not traffic in proven statements, only rhetoric and what people want to believe.
***Do you know how stupid you sound?
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.