One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Why Is Everything the Left Doesn’t Like ‘Misinformation’?
Page <prev 2 of 2
Mar 9, 2022 15:48:53   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
Ricktloml wrote:
For leftists if something is spoken/written/dreamed-up and it advances their leftist/socialist/communists agenda...it is proven. If any information stands in the way of their corrupt/power hungry agenda...it's misinformation as far as the left is concerned. Like Satan, for the left the truth isn't in them. Lying/cheating/stealing/murdering is their true agenda



Their pride will be their undoing.

Reply
Mar 9, 2022 16:16:43   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
Milosia2 wrote:
Everything that comes out of Faux Nouse
Is misinformation. They are not structured as regular news agencies are.
They are not a news agency. They can say whatever they want . This is because they have an Entertainment License not a Newsbroadcasters License.
The entertainment license allows them to say whatever they want.
Yet they are the first to complain about
late night shows like Colbert making fun of them. Blatant Hypocrisy.




I laugh in your hypocrite face.

Reply
Mar 9, 2022 16:25:32   #
Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio
 
Michael Rich wrote:
I laugh in your hypocrite face.


Only the facts , m’am !

Reply
 
 
Mar 9, 2022 16:26:45   #
Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio
 
AuntiE wrote:
”The truth on the” left is whatever you feel at any particular moment.

The nation has suffered greatly due to the left’s governing based on feelings rather than thinking.


Based on the facts youz keep denying.

Reply
Mar 9, 2022 16:28:01   #
Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio
 
AuntiE wrote:
https://www.dailysignal.com/2022/03/07/why-is-everything-left-doesnt-like-misinformation/

Why Is Everything the Left Doesn’t Like ‘Misinformation’?
Douglas Blair / @DouglasKBlair / March 07, 2022

The government’s Big Brother-style crusade to control what gets posted online continues apace.

U.S. Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy on March 3 demanded that Big Tech companies provide the government with data surrounding COVID-19 “misinformation” on their platforms.

The New York Times reported that Murthy asked the companies to reveal “exactly how many users saw or may have been exposed to instances of COVID-19 misinformation,” on top of providing the demographic data of those users.

The request follows on the heels of an advisory released last July, in which Murthy said misinformation “can cause confusion, sow distrust, and undermine public health efforts, including our ongoing work to end the COVID-19 pandemic.”

The term “misinformation” has become a bit of a catch-all in the COVID-19 era. It certainly can apply to actual untruths, such as that the COVID-19 vaccine contains microchips. But far more frequently, the term is weaponized against ideas the powers-that-be don’t like.

Take, for example, the ever-evolving tale of the Chinese lab-leak hypothesis regarding COVID-19.

Ground zero for the initial outbreak of COVID-19 was quickly determined to be Wuhan, China. The city is home to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, a lab known for conducting gain-of-function research into coronaviruses. When people started suggesting the two were linked, the response from health authorities and corporate media was instantaneous.

The hypothesis was lambasted as a racist conspiracy theory, and anyone who tried to disseminate it was quickly labeled a fringe kook or censored entirely on social media. Back in February 2020, Facebook banned an article from the New York Post claiming COVID-19 could have leaked from a lab.

Fast-forward a year to 2021 and suddenly the lab leak was no longer misinformation worthy of exile from the internet. The same outlets and experts who had gone to great lengths to smear anyone who dared go against their medical decrees were suddenly singing a very different tune.

Facebook itself was forced to recant, and announced it would stop removing posts that asserted COVID-19 leaked from a lab.

That brings us back to the issue of Murthy demanding data on “misinformation” from these Big Tech platforms. As the lab-leak saga demonstrated, the definition of what qualifies as misinformation is incredibly nebulous and can change with the political winds.

Murthy’s fishing expedition to find “misinformation” is for one purpose only; namely, control of our lives and of what we think.

As the pandemic dragged on, the government and Big Tech used the label of “misinformation” to ban ideas and outlets they dislike. They found that strategy to be incredibly effective and want to continue using it into the future.

The strategy is no longer limited to COVID-19, either. The popular streaming site Twitch announced March 3 that it plans to ban users who spread “misinformation” on other topics, including election fraud, and chillingly undefined “misinformation that may impact public safety.”

Once censorship becomes a common strategy against perceived “misinformation,” free speech is effectively dead. Don’t like what your political opposition is saying? Label it “misinformation,” ban it, and call it a day.

Many censorious tyrants have cloaked their actions in the name of “public safety” as Murthy has. And as those definitions of “public safety” rest on foundations as solid as shifting sands, it’s inevitable that the term “misinformation” will be abused further in the future.

For the sake of free speech, it’s essential that Murthy and the “misinformation” mob be countered at every turn. Americans should be empowered to discover the truth on their own, and not have their experiences curated by a biased bureaucracy or unelected tech czars.

The truth is out there. We don’t need Murthy to tell us what it is.
https://www.dailysignal.com/2022/03/07/why-is-ever... (show quote)


Who knows ?
Who cares ?

Unelected tech czars ?

Reply
Mar 10, 2022 07:25:54   #
guzzimaestro
 
Michael Rich wrote:
When a word like, "likely" is used, it leaves room for plenty of doubt.

Fauci is the man we were told to believe in this bio weapon attack, and he has proven to be a blatant liar.

To me and to many like me, we don't trust just because we're told to.


Felchy and his ilk were funding the Wuhan labs. That's grounds for treason right there

Reply
Mar 10, 2022 09:59:32   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
guzzimaestro wrote:
Felchy and his ilk were funding the Wuhan labs. That's grounds for treason right there


What good is he alive?

Reply
 
 
Mar 10, 2022 10:20:11   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
AuntiE wrote:
https://www.dailysignal.com/2022/03/07/why-is-everything-left-doesnt-like-misinformation/

Why Is Everything the Left Doesn’t Like ‘Misinformation’?
Douglas Blair / @DouglasKBlair / March 07, 2022

The government’s Big Brother-style crusade to control what gets posted online continues apace.

U.S. Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy on March 3 demanded that Big Tech companies provide the government with data surrounding COVID-19 “misinformation” on their platforms.

The New York Times reported that Murthy asked the companies to reveal “exactly how many users saw or may have been exposed to instances of COVID-19 misinformation,” on top of providing the demographic data of those users.

The request follows on the heels of an advisory released last July, in which Murthy said misinformation “can cause confusion, sow distrust, and undermine public health efforts, including our ongoing work to end the COVID-19 pandemic.”

The term “misinformation” has become a bit of a catch-all in the COVID-19 era. It certainly can apply to actual untruths, such as that the COVID-19 vaccine contains microchips. But far more frequently, the term is weaponized against ideas the powers-that-be don’t like.

Take, for example, the ever-evolving tale of the Chinese lab-leak hypothesis regarding COVID-19.

Ground zero for the initial outbreak of COVID-19 was quickly determined to be Wuhan, China. The city is home to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, a lab known for conducting gain-of-function research into coronaviruses. When people started suggesting the two were linked, the response from health authorities and corporate media was instantaneous.

The hypothesis was lambasted as a racist conspiracy theory, and anyone who tried to disseminate it was quickly labeled a fringe kook or censored entirely on social media. Back in February 2020, Facebook banned an article from the New York Post claiming COVID-19 could have leaked from a lab.

Fast-forward a year to 2021 and suddenly the lab leak was no longer misinformation worthy of exile from the internet. The same outlets and experts who had gone to great lengths to smear anyone who dared go against their medical decrees were suddenly singing a very different tune.

Facebook itself was forced to recant, and announced it would stop removing posts that asserted COVID-19 leaked from a lab.

That brings us back to the issue of Murthy demanding data on “misinformation” from these Big Tech platforms. As the lab-leak saga demonstrated, the definition of what qualifies as misinformation is incredibly nebulous and can change with the political winds.

Murthy’s fishing expedition to find “misinformation” is for one purpose only; namely, control of our lives and of what we think.

As the pandemic dragged on, the government and Big Tech used the label of “misinformation” to ban ideas and outlets they dislike. They found that strategy to be incredibly effective and want to continue using it into the future.

The strategy is no longer limited to COVID-19, either. The popular streaming site Twitch announced March 3 that it plans to ban users who spread “misinformation” on other topics, including election fraud, and chillingly undefined “misinformation that may impact public safety.”

Once censorship becomes a common strategy against perceived “misinformation,” free speech is effectively dead. Don’t like what your political opposition is saying? Label it “misinformation,” ban it, and call it a day.

Many censorious tyrants have cloaked their actions in the name of “public safety” as Murthy has. And as those definitions of “public safety” rest on foundations as solid as shifting sands, it’s inevitable that the term “misinformation” will be abused further in the future.

For the sake of free speech, it’s essential that Murthy and the “misinformation” mob be countered at every turn. Americans should be empowered to discover the truth on their own, and not have their experiences curated by a biased bureaucracy or unelected tech czars.

The truth is out there. We don’t need Murthy to tell us what it is.
https://www.dailysignal.com/2022/03/07/why-is-ever... (show quote)


They have to call opposition misinformation so it doesn't seem obvious to them and their little brains that they are censoring.

Reply
Mar 10, 2022 10:34:08   #
guzzimaestro
 
Michael Rich wrote:
What good is he alive?


None

Reply
Mar 12, 2022 04:40:54   #
bggamers Loc: georgia
 
Milosia2 wrote:
Everything that comes out of Faux Nouse
Is misinformation. They are not structured as regular news agencies are.
They are not a news agency. They can say whatever they want . This is because they have an Entertainment License not a Newsbroadcasters License.
The entertainment license allows them to say whatever they want.
Yet they are the first to complain about
late night shows like Colbert making fun of them. Blatant Hypocrisy.


Not everything comes from fox widen your net work and learn the man who helped or developed the mRNA has been trying to warn people about the side effect Fauci and Biden have shut everyone who speaks anything but their BS the papers are being released about the side effects from Pfizer there are 1,500 side effect most deadly and many life long including AIDS, HEPITITUS, Miscarriges to name 3 this is why they didn't want anyone to be able to see them for 75 years. Theres also research coming out where they found this vaccine can cause covid this is why 70% of the people in the hospital are fully vaccinated .Thats why the CDC has been hiding information THEY knew. But when there's a way to make a buck count on the dems to throw everyone under the bus

Reply
Mar 12, 2022 08:00:12   #
guzzimaestro
 
bggamers wrote:
Not everything comes from fox widen your net work and learn the man who helped or developed the mRNA has been trying to warn people about the side effect Fauci and Biden have shut everyone who speaks anything but their BS the papers are being released about the side effects from Pfizer there are 1,500 side effect most deadly and many life long including AIDS, HEPITITUS, Miscarriges to name 3 this is why they didn't want anyone to be able to see them for 75 years. Theres also research coming out where they found this vaccine can cause covid this is why 70% of the people in the hospital are fully vaccinated .Thats why the CDC has been hiding information THEY knew. But when there's a way to make a buck count on the dems to throw everyone under the bus
Not everything comes from fox widen your net work ... (show quote)


More younger folks are dying every day. There's at least one story per day in local or national news. cause of death is never given.

Reply
 
 
Mar 12, 2022 11:15:56   #
bggamers Loc: georgia
 
guzzimaestro wrote:
More younger folks are dying every day. There's at least one story per day in local or national news. cause of death is never given.


just read where a 7 yr old died after they gave him the shot

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.