One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Forget Hillary's emails....John Eastman's could get Donald Trump Indicted!
Page 1 of 2 next>
Mar 3, 2022 17:20:58   #
336Robin Loc: North Carolina
 
Looks like Trumpenstilskin has a few emails he would rather not have you know about.
Indicting type emails! He always could out do Hillary on crime!



Miami Herald
Forget Hillary’s emails. John Eastman’s emails could get Donald Trump indicted | Opinion
Gregg Barak
Thu, March 3, 2022, 9:45 AM


The House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 assault on the Capitol tipped its hand on Wednesday in a U.S. federal district court filing in Orange County, California.

The filing over the testimony of John Eastman, who has sued the committee to withhold turning over thousands of pages of his emails, suggests that when the bipartisan panel releases its final report this summer, it will recommend that U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland prosecute the former President Trump and several of his henchmen for criminal conspiracy to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election, to defraud the United States and thus, to violate federal law banning the obstruction of an official proceeding.

Eastman’s emails — he’s a professor and founding director of the Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, a public interest law firm affiliated with the conservative think tank Claremont Institute — allegedly provide further evidence of the former president’s conspiracy in the insurrection.

Eastman had advanced a fringe legal theory after Trump’s loss to Joe Biden, claiming Vice President Mike Pence could stop the certification of the 2020 election on Jan. 6, 2021. Pence after consultation with several people, including former Vice President Dan Quayle, who’s also from Indiana, concluded that he had no power under the Constitution to block certification of the election.

- ADVERTISEMENT -

According to the court filing, Trump and his comrades entered into an agreement “to defraud the United States by interfering with the election certification process, disseminating false information about election fraud and pressuring state officials to alter state election results and federal officials to assist in that effort.”

Unfortunately, but understandably, Congress has no power to initiate a criminal investigation or to bring charges against Trump and his co-conspirators. That will remain in the purview of the Justice Department and federal prosecutors to determine whether Trump’s actions after the election amounted to crimes against the state.

Of course, such a referral to the DOJ would pressure Garland, who has sought to insulate the Justice Department from “partisan interference” after years in which Trump pressured the agency to prosecute political rivals and later to discredit the 2020 election.

Meanwhile, the racketeer-in-chief is facing an onslaught of criminal investigations and civil lawsuits — notably, the high-profile cases involving the former president pressuring Brad Raffensperger, Georgia’s Republican secretary of state, to change the state’s vote totals, as well as the civil and criminal investigations in New York revolving around more than a decade of Trump’s finances and taxes.

In addition, Trump faces more than a dozen civil lawsuits pursued by individuals and organizations for an array of alleged lawlessness, including defamation, civil conspiracy and causing assaults on Capitol police officers.

Trump very well could become the first former president to be indicted for crimes committed as commander-in-chief.

Gregg Barak is an emeritus professor of Criminology and Criminal Justice at Eastern Michigan University, co-founder and North American Editor of the Journal of White Collar and Corporate Crime and the author of “Criminology on Trump,” to be published in May.

Reply
Mar 3, 2022 17:22:07   #
woodguru
 
336Robin wrote:
Miami Herald
Forget Hillary’s emails. John Eastman’s emails could get Donald Trump indicted | Opinion
Gregg Barak
Thu, March 3, 2022, 9:45 AM


The House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 assault on the Capitol tipped its hand on Wednesday in a U.S. federal district court filing in Orange County, California.

The filing over the testimony of John Eastman, who has sued the committee to withhold turning over thousands of pages of his emails, suggests that when the bipartisan panel releases its final report this summer, it will recommend that U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland prosecute the former President Trump and several of his henchmen for criminal conspiracy to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election, to defraud the United States and thus, to violate federal law banning the obstruction of an official proceeding.

Eastman’s emails — he’s a professor and founding director of the Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, a public interest law firm affiliated with the conservative think tank Claremont Institute — allegedly provide further evidence of the former president’s conspiracy in the insurrection.

Eastman had advanced a fringe legal theory after Trump’s loss to Joe Biden, claiming Vice President Mike Pence could stop the certification of the 2020 election on Jan. 6, 2021. Pence after consultation with several people, including former Vice President Dan Quayle, who’s also from Indiana, concluded that he had no power under the Constitution to block certification of the election.

- ADVERTISEMENT -

According to the court filing, Trump and his comrades entered into an agreement “to defraud the United States by interfering with the election certification process, disseminating false information about election fraud and pressuring state officials to alter state election results and federal officials to assist in that effort.”

Unfortunately, but understandably, Congress has no power to initiate a criminal investigation or to bring charges against Trump and his co-conspirators. That will remain in the purview of the Justice Department and federal prosecutors to determine whether Trump’s actions after the election amounted to crimes against the state.

Of course, such a referral to the DOJ would pressure Garland, who has sought to insulate the Justice Department from “partisan interference” after years in which Trump pressured the agency to prosecute political rivals and later to discredit the 2020 election.

Meanwhile, the racketeer-in-chief is facing an onslaught of criminal investigations and civil lawsuits — notably, the high-profile cases involving the former president pressuring Brad Raffensperger, Georgia’s Republican secretary of state, to change the state’s vote totals, as well as the civil and criminal investigations in New York revolving around more than a decade of Trump’s finances and taxes.

In addition, Trump faces more than a dozen civil lawsuits pursued by individuals and organizations for an array of alleged lawlessness, including defamation, civil conspiracy and causing assaults on Capitol police officers.

Trump very well could become the first former president to be indicted for crimes committed as commander-in-chief.

Gregg Barak is an emeritus professor of Criminology and Criminal Justice at Eastern Michigan University, co-founder and North American Editor of the Journal of White Collar and Corporate Crime and the author of “Criminology on Trump,” to be published in May.
Miami Herald br Forget Hillary’s emails. John East... (show quote)


Finally, some emails that mean something

Reply
Mar 3, 2022 17:33:44   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
336Robin wrote:
Looks like Trumpenstilskin has a few emails he would rather not have you know about.
Indicting type emails! He always could out do Hillary on crime!



Miami Herald
Forget Hillary’s emails. John Eastman’s emails could get Donald Trump indicted | Opinion
Gregg Barak
Thu, March 3, 2022, 9:45 AM


The House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 assault on the Capitol tipped its hand on Wednesday in a U.S. federal district court filing in Orange County, California.

The filing over the testimony of John Eastman, who has sued the committee to withhold turning over thousands of pages of his emails, suggests that when the bipartisan panel releases its final report this summer, it will recommend that U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland prosecute the former President Trump and several of his henchmen for criminal conspiracy to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election, to defraud the United States and thus, to violate federal law banning the obstruction of an official proceeding.

Eastman’s emails — he’s a professor and founding director of the Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, a public interest law firm affiliated with the conservative think tank Claremont Institute — allegedly provide further evidence of the former president’s conspiracy in the insurrection.

Eastman had advanced a fringe legal theory after Trump’s loss to Joe Biden, claiming Vice President Mike Pence could stop the certification of the 2020 election on Jan. 6, 2021. Pence after consultation with several people, including former Vice President Dan Quayle, who’s also from Indiana, concluded that he had no power under the Constitution to block certification of the election.

- ADVERTISEMENT -

According to the court filing, Trump and his comrades entered into an agreement “to defraud the United States by interfering with the election certification process, disseminating false information about election fraud and pressuring state officials to alter state election results and federal officials to assist in that effort.”

Unfortunately, but understandably, Congress has no power to initiate a criminal investigation or to bring charges against Trump and his co-conspirators. That will remain in the purview of the Justice Department and federal prosecutors to determine whether Trump’s actions after the election amounted to crimes against the state.

Of course, such a referral to the DOJ would pressure Garland, who has sought to insulate the Justice Department from “partisan interference” after years in which Trump pressured the agency to prosecute political rivals and later to discredit the 2020 election.

Meanwhile, the racketeer-in-chief is facing an onslaught of criminal investigations and civil lawsuits — notably, the high-profile cases involving the former president pressuring Brad Raffensperger, Georgia’s Republican secretary of state, to change the state’s vote totals, as well as the civil and criminal investigations in New York revolving around more than a decade of Trump’s finances and taxes.

In addition, Trump faces more than a dozen civil lawsuits pursued by individuals and organizations for an array of alleged lawlessness, including defamation, civil conspiracy and causing assaults on Capitol police officers.

Trump very well could become the first former president to be indicted for crimes committed as commander-in-chief.

Gregg Barak is an emeritus professor of Criminology and Criminal Justice at Eastern Michigan University, co-founder and North American Editor of the Journal of White Collar and Corporate Crime and the author of “Criminology on Trump,” to be published in May.
Looks like Trumpenstilskin has a few emails he wou... (show quote)


We gonna git him..oh boy...oh boy...oh boy..

This has been reprobate war cry since Trump announced he was running for President.

Reply
Mar 3, 2022 17:48:53   #
Liberty Tree
 
Michael Rich wrote:
We gonna git him..oh boy...oh boy...oh boy..

This has been reprobate war cry since Trump announced he was running for President.


They play the same broken record over and over, but that is all their handlers feed them. It is the routine troll diet.

Reply
Mar 3, 2022 18:19:47   #
Wolf counselor Loc: Heart of Texas
 
336Robin wrote:
Looks like Trumpenstilskin has a few emails he would rather not have you know about.
Indicting type emails! He always could out do Hillary on crime!



Miami Herald
Forget Hillary’s emails. John Eastman’s emails could get Donald Trump indicted | Opinion
Gregg Barak
Thu, March 3, 2022, 9:45 AM


The House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 assault on the Capitol tipped its hand on Wednesday in a U.S. federal district court filing in Orange County, California.

The filing over the testimony of John Eastman, who has sued the committee to withhold turning over thousands of pages of his emails, suggests that when the bipartisan panel releases its final report this summer, it will recommend that U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland prosecute the former President Trump and several of his henchmen for criminal conspiracy to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election, to defraud the United States and thus, to violate federal law banning the obstruction of an official proceeding.

Eastman’s emails — he’s a professor and founding director of the Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, a public interest law firm affiliated with the conservative think tank Claremont Institute — allegedly provide further evidence of the former president’s conspiracy in the insurrection.

Eastman had advanced a fringe legal theory after Trump’s loss to Joe Biden, claiming Vice President Mike Pence could stop the certification of the 2020 election on Jan. 6, 2021. Pence after consultation with several people, including former Vice President Dan Quayle, who’s also from Indiana, concluded that he had no power under the Constitution to block certification of the election.

- ADVERTISEMENT -

According to the court filing, Trump and his comrades entered into an agreement “to defraud the United States by interfering with the election certification process, disseminating false information about election fraud and pressuring state officials to alter state election results and federal officials to assist in that effort.”

Unfortunately, but understandably, Congress has no power to initiate a criminal investigation or to bring charges against Trump and his co-conspirators. That will remain in the purview of the Justice Department and federal prosecutors to determine whether Trump’s actions after the election amounted to crimes against the state.

Of course, such a referral to the DOJ would pressure Garland, who has sought to insulate the Justice Department from “partisan interference” after years in which Trump pressured the agency to prosecute political rivals and later to discredit the 2020 election.

Meanwhile, the racketeer-in-chief is facing an onslaught of criminal investigations and civil lawsuits — notably, the high-profile cases involving the former president pressuring Brad Raffensperger, Georgia’s Republican secretary of state, to change the state’s vote totals, as well as the civil and criminal investigations in New York revolving around more than a decade of Trump’s finances and taxes.

In addition, Trump faces more than a dozen civil lawsuits pursued by individuals and organizations for an array of alleged lawlessness, including defamation, civil conspiracy and causing assaults on Capitol police officers.

Trump very well could become the first former president to be indicted for crimes committed as commander-in-chief.

Gregg Barak is an emeritus professor of Criminology and Criminal Justice at Eastern Michigan University, co-founder and North American Editor of the Journal of White Collar and Corporate Crime and the author of “Criminology on Trump,” to be published in May.
Looks like Trumpenstilskin has a few emails he wou... (show quote)


Trump is kicking your ass via your feeble mind.



Reply
Mar 3, 2022 18:28:23   #
Wonttakeitanymore
 
Michael Rich wrote:
We gonna git him..oh boy...oh boy...oh boy..

This has been reprobate war cry since Trump announced he was running for President.


You know it and the zombies are shuffling the crap ever more!

Reply
Mar 3, 2022 18:35:55   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
woodguru wrote:
Finally, some emails that mean something


Hmmm, so the fact Hillary Clinton had Top Secret documents from NRO on a non secure, non government computer does not mean anything. FYI, all documents within NRO are classified as Secret and Top Secret. Mayhaps you are unaware she had to sign a document declaring she understood the protocols for dealing with Secret and Top Secret documents. She failed abysmally at following the US Code for the handling of such documents.

Reply
 
 
Mar 3, 2022 18:36:31   #
Tiptop789 Loc: State of Denial
 
Wolf counselor wrote:
Trump is kicking your ass via your feeble mind.



Kinda dumb, this one's funnier:


Or hers another:
For months, the president (Trump) has stated that he prefers not to wear a face mask. But recently, he has revised that idea and said he enjoyed wearing a mask because it made him feel like the Lone Ranger.

Trump's just a lot of fun





Reply
Mar 3, 2022 18:43:11   #
Wolf counselor Loc: Heart of Texas
 
Tiptop789 wrote:
Kinda dumb, this one's funnier:


Or hers another:
For months, the president (Trump) has stated that he prefers not to wear a face mask. But recently, he has revised that idea and said he enjoyed wearing a mask because it made him feel like the Lone Ranger.

Trump's just a lot of fun


Trump's got this.



Reply
Mar 3, 2022 20:04:53   #
Tiptop789 Loc: State of Denial
 
Wolf counselor wrote:
Trump's got this.


That's impressive all right. I have to agree with you.

Reply
Mar 4, 2022 09:29:38   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
They play the same broken record over and over, but that is all their handlers feed them. It is the routine troll diet.


That, it is.

Reply
Mar 4, 2022 09:29:41   #
Radiance3
 
336Robin wrote:
Looks like Trumpenstilskin has a few emails he would rather not have you know about.
Indicting type emails! He always could out do Hillary on crime!



Miami Herald
Forget Hillary’s emails. John Eastman’s emails could get Donald Trump indicted | Opinion
Gregg Barak
Thu, March 3, 2022, 9:45 AM


The House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 assault on the Capitol tipped its hand on Wednesday in a U.S. federal district court filing in Orange County, California.

The filing over the testimony of John Eastman, who has sued the committee to withhold turning over thousands of pages of his emails, suggests that when the bipartisan panel releases its final report this summer, it will recommend that U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland prosecute the former President Trump and several of his henchmen for criminal conspiracy to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election, to defraud the United States and thus, to violate federal law banning the obstruction of an official proceeding.

Eastman’s emails — he’s a professor and founding director of the Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, a public interest law firm affiliated with the conservative think tank Claremont Institute — allegedly provide further evidence of the former president’s conspiracy in the insurrection.

Eastman had advanced a fringe legal theory after Trump’s loss to Joe Biden, claiming Vice President Mike Pence could stop the certification of the 2020 election on Jan. 6, 2021. Pence after consultation with several people, including former Vice President Dan Quayle, who’s also from Indiana, concluded that he had no power under the Constitution to block certification of the election.

- ADVERTISEMENT -

According to the court filing, Trump and his comrades entered into an agreement “to defraud the United States by interfering with the election certification process, disseminating false information about election fraud and pressuring state officials to alter state election results and federal officials to assist in that effort.”

Unfortunately, but understandably, Congress has no power to initiate a criminal investigation or to bring charges against Trump and his co-conspirators. That will remain in the purview of the Justice Department and federal prosecutors to determine whether Trump’s actions after the election amounted to crimes against the state.

Of course, such a referral to the DOJ would pressure Garland, who has sought to insulate the Justice Department from “partisan interference” after years in which Trump pressured the agency to prosecute political rivals and later to discredit the 2020 election.

Meanwhile, the racketeer-in-chief is facing an onslaught of criminal investigations and civil lawsuits — notably, the high-profile cases involving the former president pressuring Brad Raffensperger, Georgia’s Republican secretary of state, to change the state’s vote totals, as well as the civil and criminal investigations in New York revolving around more than a decade of Trump’s finances and taxes.

In addition, Trump faces more than a dozen civil lawsuits pursued by individuals and organizations for an array of alleged lawlessness, including defamation, civil conspiracy and causing assaults on Capitol police officers.

Trump very well could become the first former president to be indicted for crimes committed as commander-in-chief.

Gregg Barak is an emeritus professor of Criminology and Criminal Justice at Eastern Michigan University, co-founder and North American Editor of the Journal of White Collar and Corporate Crime and the author of “Criminology on Trump,” to be published in May.
Looks like Trumpenstilskin has a few emails he wou... (show quote)

===============
The Durham reports of investigations have already been released. Hillary the master -mind of the Russia hoax conspiracies. She paid all those indicted people with millions of dollars to create fake reports against Trump, and the surveillance of Trump during the campaign election and while he was the president at the White House. Indicted were: Clinton's lawyer, paid Russia agent Egor, and the Hi-Tech officer all paid millions of dollars Hillary.

Reply
Mar 4, 2022 09:31:29   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
Wonttakeitanymore wrote:
You know it and the zombies are shuffling the crap ever more!


And....they wouldn't be be doing it, if Trump didn't have them shaking in their boots.

Reply
Mar 4, 2022 09:33:48   #
Radiance3
 
Wolf counselor wrote:
Trump's got this.

===============
One of the reasons attacking Trump. He has a very beautiful wife. They have been attacking also cause his wife is not from America but born in foreign land. Men and women are jealous of Trump and beautiful Melania.

Reply
Mar 4, 2022 09:39:34   #
Radiance3
 
Wolf counselor wrote:
Trump's got this.

===============
This woman wants to be president of the United States.

Meet, the democrats' candidate for president.
Meet, the democrats' candidate for president....

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.