===============
Ri-chard, you are a patriot. This is a very interesting challenging, and huge project to undertake. And it also faces lots of obstacles waiting ahead.

Reading some parts of the Constitution, I see that for almost 232 years of implementation, there are some provisions that have been changed, due to legislative actions. Article IV, section 4, have some compelling issues waiting to be fixed.

What you are thinking about is a very huge undertaking. We could not just do it by ourselves. Perhaps you are a lot younger than I am. My energy has faded away over time. I was very active when I was younger. Fact is I wish I am 40 years old again. I want to challenge the US Treasury which I believe Janet Yellin is doing a very poor job when her policies are not favorable to economic growth. I wonder why.

Now, what we can do is support those in Congress and the WH, who will listen to the Conservative causes for our country. We are a Republic and not a democratic government. But the left has abused it thru fraud, making it democratic. That is why Joe Biden invited tens of millions of illegals to make them the majority, along with providing naturalization to the DACA and their families.

We must focus on choosing and supporting the qualified people to be in Congress, at the WH. The SC depends who is in charge of the WH, and who controls Congress.

Good luck and good night.

My group of like mined readers and explorers of our American history all agree the the corrective actions all start with your State Constitution needing be made compliant with Article IV of the USA Constitution. That cannot be considered anything other than Legal for following the written law in the Federal Constitution. If that isn't done then nothing related to a permanent change can happen, so we can take back what is owed to us. Everything for corrective actions starts local.

You don't go to Washington DC; they are not a part of the United State of America. You know this! You don't go to the King's Court crossing their BAR, they will control their narrative and their law as they see it.

The solution is simple and written in common English wording in Article IV. the problem is getting enough people to read the Federal Constitution with the understanding it is the law of the land, and it was breached. We must now remedy that breach with a Republican Form of Government. should they not comply or begin a stall of action you immediately gather a collective of the people of your State to have them removed for breach of their employment contact by Recall.
Education done by grass root sharing at community association meeting, mothers of school age children, church members, small churches especially black churches. No large churches to begin with. Flyers placed on the windshields of cars at a schoolboard meeting etc.

Who are the ones that would say no to this? They are the ones you way away from and just say next! To do nothing is what will be delivered.

================
I know that is a noble proposition. I wish that was done years ago. Now blue states have been rooted to corruptions , violence and poverty of the lowly abounds. Who get ahead are their elected communist -democrat leaders.
Our country has so many priorities to solve
Biden and the LEFT has now by -passed the constitution. I have been observing this and it rapidly started under Barack Obama regime. The Constitution now is irrelevant. They are Marxist, their police officers are the BLM's. Our freedom us under duress. Biden rules like a tyrant following Trudeau. For 2022, he will spend $ 6 trillion for various lefty policies. He is asking $4 trillion for infrastructure.
Congress and Senate approved in 2021, the $2.1 trillion for the infrastructure but in actuality on 9% of that went to infrastructure. Now he is asking another $4 trillion for infrastructure. Last month he shifted $2 billion from the Covid19 budget to fund his 2 million illegal aliens who just arrived. Now he is asking another $30 billion for Covid19 control.
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/27/business/economy/biden-plan.html

Our highest inflation has no chance of going down but upward with this kind of spending. Very wrong solution. Tax time is coming and I am paying so much for this only to be squandered by FJB to his liberal policies.

We must work hard this 2022, to rid of them from Congress, and 2024 from the WH.
This is our priority now.

Wish we could fix the Article IV of the Constitution. But right now we have priorities to face to save this country from Communism. It is blatantly displayed that Biden is already doing 20% as a communist dictator. He is bankrupting this country and all of us. He allows WOKE in the military and in schools.

You wrote more, but this is as far as I read. I don't have much patience for being stereotyped like that.

If you use the phrase "I believe", you are in your area of expertise.

(That's because you're in a position to know your own mind better than anybody else does.)

If you use the phrase "you believe", you are in the other person's area of expertise.

(That's because the other person is in a position to know his/her own mind better than anybody else does.)

==================
"Believe in something" No, not an expression of expertise. That's my understanding based on the statement I've read, and based on how I feel. The internal effects on my thoughts and feeling arrived me to that belief.

I don't enforce others to believe me. But just my own. If they have other belief system, that's their choice. People think differently, and the clarity of their thoughts are expressed through belief system or just a thought.

What do you want me to say? I think? Let me review what I said.

In the 2nd post on page 21, you quote 3 lines from me, then you say:

"I need to be detailed to present facts about what I've written here.
Why not, we are talking about common bond, and objectives. Corporation is a great example. This won't fit into your mind, cause you believe people must depend on the government for handouts instead of earning for themselves."

So that may be why you didn't find it when you were looking for the phrase "I believe". You were saying "you believe people must depend ...".

When you say:

"This won't fit into your mind, cause you believe people must depend on the government for handouts instead of earning for themselves."

it is demeaning, somewhat as if were to say (in some other context) some presumptuous thing about your mind, such as:

"This won't fit into your mind, because you believe anyone who shoots a black person must be a patriot." as if I knew that, and as if that were all your mind amounted to.

You could be right about another thing, though, which is that I'm (maybe) more sensitive to insults than most people are. Whatever about that, even so, you had oversimplified very much, and made a wrong assumption.

In the 2nd post on page 21, you quote 3 lines from me, then you say:

"I need to be detailed to present facts about what I've written here.
Why not, we are talking about common bond, and objectives. Corporation is a great example. This won't fit into your mind, cause you believe people must depend on the government for handouts instead of earning for themselves."

So that may be why you didn't find it when you were looking for the phrase "I believe". You were saying "you believe people must depend ...".

When you say:

"This won't fit into your mind, cause you believe people must depend on the government for handouts instead of earning for themselves."

it is demeaning, somewhat as if were to say (in some other context) some presumptuous thing about your mind, such as:

"This won't fit into your mind, because you believe anyone who shoots a black person must be a patriot." as if I knew that, and as if that were all your mind amounted to.

You could be right about another thing, though, which is that I'm (maybe) more sensitive to insults than most people are. Whatever about that, even so, you had oversimplified very much, and made a wrong assumption.

https://nypost.com/2022/02/20/we-need-a-better-way-to-fight-climate-change/

The green agenda is too expensive: We need a better way to fight climate change
By Bjorn Lomborg
February 20, 2022 4:37pm Updated

Money
Reducing emissions by 80% will cost the United States more than $2.1 trillion every year from 2050.
Getty Images
MORE ON:
CLIMATE CHANGE
Climate activists spend millions for friendly Associated Press ‘news’
Biden, Suozzi & fellow Dems should blame themselves — not Con Ed — for soaring electric bills
Larry Fink as Wall St. Dr. Evil?: ‘Woke’ within reason
The hysterical woke can’t cope with post-Trump, post-COVID world
Energy costs are climbing out of control. A gallon of gas costs nearly $1 more than a year ago. Americans are experiencing sticker shock this winter on home-heating costs. Though part of this is due to the world restarting after the pandemic, climate policies are increasingly driving prices up. We need a change of direction.

Fossil fuels still deliver the vast majority of energy. The European Union puts climate at the top of its political agenda, yet more than 80% of its primary energy needs are met by fossil fuels, according to the International Energy Agency. Despite endless environmental talk, solar and wind contribute only about 3% of Europe’s total energy.

Making a transition from fossil fuels to green energy is costly. Solar and wind can only deliver electricity, which accounts for less than a fifth of total energy consumption. Moreover, as Europe is learning, leaning on unreliable sources like wind leaves households vulnerable: Wind speeds were unusually low for most of 2021, causing much of Europe’s current energy pain.

Joe Biden
President Joe Biden at Plymouth Area Renewable Energy Initiative in Plymouth, New Hampshire, June 4, 2019.
REUTERS
Solar panels
Solar and wind can only deliver electricity, which accounts for less than a fifth of total energy consumption.
AFP via Getty Images
When the sun doesn’t shine or the wind doesn’t blow, prices rise quickly and we have to revert to fossil fuels for backup. Batteries are inadequate and expensive, easily quadrupling solar electricity costs and failing to provide much power. In 2021, Europe only had battery capacity to backup less than 1 ½ minutes of its average electricity usage. By 2030, with 10 times the stock of batteries, and somewhat more usage needed, they’ll have enough for 12 minutes.

As countries move to “net-zero carbon” emissions — the target endorsed by President Joe Biden, the European Union and many others — costs will escalate much higher again.

The Bank of America has found that achieving net-zero will cost $150 trillion over 30 years, almost twice the combined annual GDP of every country on Earth. The annual cost of $5 trillion is more than all the world’s governments and households spend every year on education.

That estimate is based on the fanciful assumption that costs are spread efficiently, with big emitters China and India cutting the most. But India says it will only keep moving toward net-zero if the rest of the world pays it $1 trillion by 2030 — something that won’t happen. Most cuts will likely only happen in rich countries, which will mean a relatively trifling cut to global emissions. The rich world will get all pain for little gain.

Wind turbines
Wind turbines in Tuscania, north of Rome.
REUTERS
In a new study, McKinsey finds most of the poorest nations in Africa would have to pay more than 10 percent of their total national incomes every year toward climate policy. This is more than these nations combined spend on education and health. This is not only implausible but also immoral on a continent where almost half a billion people still live in abject poverty.

Research published in Nature finds that reducing emissions just 80% will cost the United States more than $2.1 trillion every year from 2050, or more than $5,000 per person, per year. The cost of achieving Biden’s promised 100% reductions will be far higher.

SEE ALSO
Left: Con Ed relieve station at the corner of East 58th street & Avenue K. Right: President Joe Biden. Rep. Tom Suozzi
Biden, Suozzi & fellow Dems should blame themselves — not Con Ed — for soaring electric bills
To put this in context, the annual US cost of World War II is estimated at $1 trillion in today’s money. Every year by 2050, climate policy could cost Americans more than twice what they paid during the Second World War.

Moreover, energy policy will turbocharge inflation. BOA estimates it will lead to an additional 3% of “greenflation.” This will reduce growth dramatically.

Most people agree climate change is a priority, but surveys show few people are willing to spend more than a few hundred dollars a year on climate policies. Asking people to spend tens or hundreds times more is a recipe for failure.

This isn’t an argument to do nothing but just to be smarter. To ensure we can transition from fossil fuels, we need to ramp up research and development to innovate down the price of green energy. We should invest across all options including fusion, fission, storage, biofuel and other sources.

Only when green energy is cheaper than fossil fuels will the world be able and willing to make the transition. Otherwise, today’s energy prices are just a taste of things to come.