son of witless

The facts are that CO2 concentrations increased during the Industrial Period and we are in a warming period, but that does not mean that one caused the other or that the warming period will inevitably continue and cause harm.

History is filled with warming, cooling, wet, and dry periods, some lasting decades, some lasting centuries. The Liberals will say that we should err on the side of caution and enact Draconian economic measures to cut Carbon emissions, but they do not reckon the enormous costs of their measures.

I would rather err on the side of reality. Long before Carbon based warming becomes a danger American Private Enterprise will on it's own switch us onto the next energy paradigm. All of these stupid Green initiatives are destructive.

Radiance3

===============
I need to be detailed to present facts about what I've written here.
Why not, we are talking about common bond, and objectives. Corporation is a great example. This won't fit into your mind, cause you believe people must depend on the government for handouts instead of earning for themselves.

The political party I cited was perfect example of what they are doing now. The justifications I presented were all facts, but your mind wants to cover them up by denying. Likewise the MSM's did just like that.

Here are some examples of what the LEFT did to maintain power.
1. Obama-Barack Obama violated the constitution several times to achieve his own goals. https://www.cato.org/commentary/top-10-ways-obama-violated-constitution-during-presidency

Barack Obama created the ObamaGate to destroy the political enemy Donald Trump.
https://www.inquirer.com/opinion/what-is-obamagate-trump-william-barr-michael-flynn-fbi-20200517.html

Hillary Clinton, shredded 30,000 emails under Congress investigations to hide her crimes. She also hammered her 2 hard drive servers to destroy all the criminal evidences .
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/hillary-clinton-deleted-33000-emails-secretary-state/story?id=42389308

She framed this Russia hoax, that the Taxpayers spent $32 million when Mueller investigated for 22 months only to find Donald innocent. The purpose was to arrive at the fraudulent schemes master-minded by Hillary Clinton to destroy Trump, and prevent him from getting into the WH, cause she desired to seat at the Oval Office to continue her crimes of thievery.
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/hillary-clinton-trump-russia-collusion-hoax-justice-gregg-jarrett
About the Russia hoax:
Right now indictment is under way by Durham to 3 people, Clinton's lawyer Sussmann, The IT tech. Executive, and a paid Russian hired Egor, to provide false claims of Hillary's schemes. As these crimes unfold, it will end up to the master-mind Hillary who ordered all these criminal activities by paying her associates-criminals to work for her.

She is a kleptomaniac, stealing antiquities from the WH when they left in 2001.
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2001-feb-10-mn-23723-story.html.

The 2020 election was stolen from Donald Trump. All evidences covered-up by the DEMOCRAT WEAPONS, the MSM's and and liberal outlets on the IT.

The January 6th schemes, this time by Pelosi and her allies, at the democrat Congress. The purpose was to accuse president Trump of insurrection when in fact, they were all frame -ups, along with the Capitol Police, and the same FBI's who had been involved in the prior hoaxes destroying Trump.

Days before the Jan 6th:
President Trump offered 20,000 National Guards, but Pelosi and the DC mayor, refused to accept. Why, cause it will destroy their schemes against Trump.

President Trump during the Jan 6th rally, ADVISED his supporters to follow their CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF PROTEST, by being PATRIOTIC, and PEACEFUL. The supporters obeyed, they sung, they prayed as they rallied for the president.

Ashley Babbit, White female Veteran, UNARMED, and Trump supporter, exercised her constitutional rights of protest. She was shot dead by a black Capitol Police Officer. Officer was NOT held accountable.

The Jan 6th were all conspired by the pig Pelosi to prevent Trump from coming back to the WH on 2024.

The final goals of these communist -democrats are associating with China's CCP, as what they are doing now. The transformation of this country from Constitutional-Republic to Communism and or Marxism. This sounds like the "hope and change" dreamed of by Barack Obama when he entered the WH in 2009.

The Marxists BLM's violent riots and destructions of the cities and states started that process in 2020. More than $2 billion dollars burned to ashes, cities inflamed, more than 1000 police officers dead, and several thousand injured, private and innocent individuals hurt and dead, stores goods stolen and looted . Until now, these crimes are going on. The Police Officers in blue cities and states
were replaced by BLM's 24/7. The police
officers were defunded, and many retired or removed from their posts by their liberal mayors, or DA's. Released criminals on the streets now killing whites, Jews, and Asians, cause they can't compete with them due to dumber brains. Several police officers and private citizens are dead victims everyday on the blue cities, like NYC. This is the kind or life we have now.

Ri-chard Loc: 23322

Also, always to consider, what are the King George's Free Sovereign and Independent States he spoke of in his victorious 1783 Document, Treaty of Peace? What you think is a state is in reality a Corporation, in other words, a Person.
See "Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is Person." 9 F. Supp 272
"Word "person" does not include state. 12 Op Atty Gen 176.
https://dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=1516
The United States Corporation Manual - 1921.pdf - Google Drive or another.

A corporation is an artificial entity, a fiction at law. They only exist in your mind. They are images in your mind, that speak to you. Hello Public Schools! We labor, pledge our property, and give our children to a fiction. Request a D&B report on your State government agencies for corporate verification. You can even request a report on your State judicial office for same result.

Radiance3

I exactly know what a private corporation is. It's purpose, its rights, and i'ts identity under the law. Fact is I created a corporation with a lawyer, several years ago on behalf of my 1st Employer.
----------------------
However, here is a more complex one, as to why the DC is considered a corporation.

What Every American Should Know
about Washington DC.

Currently this is the DC where our Central Government is located.

Washington, D.C., formally the District of Columbia is also known as D.C. or Washington. It is the capital city of the United States of America, but did you know it is not owned by America?

The district is not a part of any U.S. state. In 1846, Congress returned the land originally ceded by Virginia. Yet we pay for all it’s infrastructure and commerce. Washington D.C. pays no taxes, though it is a capital city.
Ironically residents of Washington D.C. lack a full self-governance. Representation in Congress is limited to a non-voting delegate to the House of Representatives and a shadow senator. It took until 1964, Washingtonians to vote in the Presidential elections. It took until 1973 for the city was allowed to elect its own mayor.

That is why the DC is not represented by Senators, Representatives and the Electoral College . Some ignorant democrats in Congress, wanted the DC to be a state to add more power to their party, thru additions of Electoral College , and Reps. and Senators . That is not possible cause the DC is not a US state.

Who owns Washington DC? London, The District of Columbia, and the Vatican.
DC has its own flag and own independent constitution. The Act of 1871 passed by Congress created a separate “corporation” known as THE UNITED STATES & corporate government for the District of Columbia. Thus DC acts as a Corporation through the Act. The flag of Washington’s District of Columbia has 3 red stars (the 3 stars denoting DC, Vatican City and City of London).

A look at the various treaties raises the question of whether the US remains a part of the British Crown colony. The basis of this goes back to the first Charter of Virginia, which in 1606 granted Britain the right to colonize America. It also gave the British King/Queen sovereign authority over colonized America and its citizens. Colonized America was created after stealing America from the Native Indians. If America was colonized with British subjects, then these people are subjects of the British Government.

To negate this was the Treaty of 1783 declaring independence from Great Britain. However, this Treaty identifies the King/Queen of England as the Prince of the United States. (please refer www.treatyofparis.com).

What needs to be further investigated is why US still continues to pay tax to a city, if it is a free nation?

The 1794 Treaty signed between England adds to the question why would US need to sign Treaty’s with England 13 years after the Paris Treaty of 1783 declaring US independent?

Did you know America when it cancelled the Charter of the First National Bank in 1811, 4500 British troops arrived and burnt down the White House, both Houses of Congress, the War Office, the US State Department and Treasury and destroyed the ratification records (signed by 12 US states). Why didn’t we learn this in history?

In 1913 the Federal Reserve was passed by US Congress handing over America’s gold and silver reserves and total control of America’s economy to the Rothschild’s. Don’t believe me, do some research.

The Federal Reserve is a privately owned banking system that does not belong to America or Americans, but more on that later.
There is no better time to question whether the USA is a country or a corporation? Who is the US President, Congress and Senators working for the Corporation or the American people?

Here's my addition why the Rothchild are considered owner of the Fed. Reserve. The Rothchild initiated the stocks investments to the bank. They don't receive profits from the
bank but rates provided by the Treasury that accrued according to their initial investments agreement based. The Federal Reserve is both a corporation and a government banking institution.

It consists of 12 banks directed under the The Chair of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The Chair is the head of the Federal Reserve, which is the central banking system of the United States. The Chair is the "active executive officer" and shall preside at meetings of the 7 Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The US president appoint them, and approved by the Senate. The Feds stay in office for 14 years.

The Federal Reserve System is the central bank of the United States. It was founded by Congress in 1913 to provide the nation with a safer, more flexible, and more stable monetary and financial system. Over the years, its role in banking and the economy has expanded.

Ri-chard Loc: 23322

For the life of me I don't understand the mentality and lack of comprehension of those on this blog - for the exception 2 or 3, for not understanding the conspirators were those said to be our heroes. They left us their documents with their penned signatures.

Asked these simple questions of yourself.

1.) Why didn't they teach us in school what General Cornwallis told General Washington 1781

2.) If Washington was the victor of the war, why did he, congress or the Senate create a Doctrine of Conquest claiming all the spoils of war fought for?

3.) Why did Ben Franklin, Adams, and Jay start making trips to Paris over the next 2 years negotiating a Treaty for King George allowing for him to dictate the terms for ending the hostilities of war in 1783?
Why were they representing King George?
Why were none of the American Patriots invited that fought for their freedoms from the Crown given a voice in this crucial event?
As the lead negotiator of this Treaty, why did Frankin and the other Esquires allow King George to claim himself as the Arch-treasurer ($$) and Prince Elector (voting) of the United States of America and Holy Roman Empire as well?
Why did the same Esquires allow the King to dictate to the Congress for what they shall do in this Treaty?
At this point was it the King's congress or We the People's?
Why did the King protect the large English landowners in this treaty and not the American common man?
What did this Treaty do for the standing of the US Constitution and Declaration of Independence?
Note, reference for title of Esquire: In United Kingdom, Esquire historically was a title of respect accorded to men of higher social rank, particularly members of the landed gentry above the rank of gentleman and below the rank of knight. In 1826, William Blackstone reiterated that, "the title shall be limited to those only who bear an office of trust under the Crown and who are styled esquires by the king in their commissions and appointments
In the King's Treaty he stated his State to be sovereign and free, not the common man.

4.) 1776 Constitutional Convention. After this convention why didn't any in Congress and State Governors implement a Republican form of government into their State Constitutions per Article IV Section 4 of the Constitution?
This would have been easy to do as the template was already written. These, are the foundational principles of our Constitutional Republic. Not a Democracy.
Our Rights are unalienable and come from God;
The purpose of civil government is to protect our God-given Rights;
Civil government is legitimate only when it operates with our consent;
& Since the US Constitution is the formal expression of the Will of the People, the federal government operates with our consent only when it obeys the Constitution.
If that is so, then isn't every state acting in breach of the constitution?

Declaration of independence says, America’s founders defined unalienable rights as including “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” These rights are considered “inherent in all persons and roughly what we mean today when we say human rights,” Has not this been breached as well? King George gave no shall to do in this matter.
The States then and now recognize us as citizen subjects to their laws and are only given the rights they give to us, not our God given rights. Again, what does this do to Article IV for having any standing for us?


5.) 1789 all in Congress and Senate knew what had been done in the 1783 Treaty. So, why was the very First Act of Congress (the Oath) to make a law just before Washington was sworn into office as POTUS, changing the title of "this Constitution for the United States of America" that is stated in the Preamble to a document titled "the Constitution of the United States" and there is not document with that title to be found anywhere in law or at law.
Was this a possible CYA Act for plausible deniability if caught to be in breach of the constitution? Remember, these where well-schooled intelligent men knowing the meaning of English words especially when they are changed and omitted from the original contract document.
So, what standing does this give the Constitution for our elected representatives representing us?

6.) America was seen as the land of plenty. Loads of natural resources noted by the English surveyors and miners in the late 1500s. So much of these natural resources King James in 1606 claimed a share of all the Gold, Silver and Copper found in America for himself and heirs in perpetuity. This was never cancelled by any other contract/treaty.
If America was so rich in everything, why did Washington and Hamilton create a Foreign Banking System "the First Bank of the United States using the King's Private English Bank with all foreign stockholders?
What happened to the Americans that wanted their own Private Side Banking, Currency form and Commerce practices?

7.) Colonial Rule of Law form lost to the King's man-made law forms. All 13 Colonies agreed between themselves a form of Colonial Law shall be implemented. The Thirteen Colonies considered their choice to be the final bases for all law in America or ever to be in America... "the colonies were so impressed with the idea of an overruling law of nature that the laws of God and so-called natural laws were regarded as the true laws, and all temporal legislation was considered to be binding only in so far as it was an expression of this natural law" Yes, back then there were some moral white hats. James Wilson, the foremost lawyer at the Constitutional Convention, a signer of the Declaration of Independence, and a man who was appointed to the Supreme Court in 1789 and was well familiar with this legal principal stated above called Natural Law and stated; "Parliament may, unquestionably, be controlled by natural or revealed law, proceeding from divine authority". It seems the King and the King's men overruled this with their man-made Laws of the Sea, Maritime, and Admiralty Law maybe to add some Roman law.

The problem I understand as I read the founding document it is not directly Biden or Trump but the faulty and deceptive foundations that were put in place opposed to what we were told. if you agree then it is us, We the People as a large collective that must enforce the Constitution and Declaration of Independence as the employment contracts we gave to our employees as their employment contract. We are the boss. We are the kings and Queens of our own and ours.
If you have an understanding of the above being truthful and factual, they we must fix. repair and replace the faulty foundations one step at a time as they encroached on our freedoms and God given rights. Not to do anything will only allow the harms done to us to expand one more step at a time.

This is not about Republican vs Democrat, neither party was founded yet, D-1828 R-1854. The English Masons, Scottish Rite Masons, Illuminati, Holy Roman Empire/Vatican and Satanic followers built the foundations. It's in our face if you look at your dollar bill, the art works and architect all over the 7 Hills of Washington DC that copy the Vatican's 7 Hills of Rome. George Washington depicted as god like on the ceiling of the Rotunda. Even a top of the Washington National Cathedral has their little satanic gargoyles in plan site. Street designs are illuminati symbols.

Who were their master/s, if we can only serve one? Was it all of them as the big club we are not invited to? Read their oaths allegiances they took before 1789. Does anybody care on this blog? This is not my conspiracy I only found them.
MAXIMS OF LAW AND EQUITY - THEY ARE THE FOUNDATIONS OF ANY LEGITIMATE AND LAWFUL SOCIETY. Sampling as follows, but read them all as they cover everything for a just remedy.:
From a wrong no contract can arise.
False in one thing, false in all things.
It is a fraud to conceal a fraud.
Fraud and justice never dwell together.
Fraud lies hidden in general expressions.
Fraud is most hateful to law.
In default of the law, the maxim rules.
A mandate of an illegal thing is void.
Remove the foundation, the work falls.

Thanks to any that read this and comprehended it.
Richard Schaum, as heir to the Creator and Administrator

Radiance3

===========
These questions , required me to ask further questions.

Here is my take on question # 6. The revolution from April 1775, to Sept. 1783, left this country insolvent that there was no other ways to separate from the British Empire but created a concession, a contract that still binds us together until today. This signed agreement with the British allowed them to hold the estate, though gave us the right to form a government of our own system. Thus the Declaration of Independence in 1776, and Constitution created in 1789, were created.

The problem was , this hidden treaty between US and the British Empire, was not written in the history books. .

My question was, why were this hidden and not disclosed in the history books? Why were those history majors not aware of these?

Likewise when we created our Federal reserves in 1913, the initial capital invested were funds coming from the Rothchild. They are the initial funders who put up the money to start, in the form of shares. This created a corporation that made as our banking system called the Federal Reserves.

Problem at that time? US did not have enough funds to start a banking system in 1913. Neither did we have enough money to stand as independent when we proclaimed our Declaration in 1776.

British used our land, the DC, as collateral or our minerals extracted from our land as collateral. Why was the Vatican even involved? During the reign of King George, the British Empire still reported to the Vatican about faith and its guideline to the Christianity. The British kings could not fully function without first the blessings of the Pope.

I really don't know the whole story since these were not provided or explained in the history books.

If you have answers, please put it down.

Ri-chard Loc: 23322

First it was all very well planned out fraud, and the Americans lost everything they fought for and received no independence from the Crown. Washington did not create a doctrine of conquest giving the king notice when to leave America. He knew this was typical custom for the victor to do. Washington seeded power to the king and the people were told they won the war and their freedoms. The common man wasn't even allowed to vote until just before or after the Civil War. The king just took all of it slowly away step by steps using the Scottish Rite Mason Governors to control the states. No excuses for anything Washington did he had good choices including all the Gold and Silver, timber, foods and other materials for clothing and had plenty of labor from the American Native Indians to build whatever was needed including ships. The British should have been sent home on commercial ships guarded by the America patriots. Great Britain retained six forts in the Great Lakes region after the Treaty of Paris. They remained in British hands until the United States acquired them peacefully through diplomatic means. The British did not abandon Fort Mackinac, Michigan post-Revolution. In fact, I don't believe they abandoned it (or actually Fort Michimilimak, Michigan,) until the War of 1812. We, as the victors should have kept all the guns and cannons. Maybe that would have stopped them from coming back and burning down the capitol with all their documents.
Heck, I spent a lot of time at the Enoch Pratt Libraries in Baltimore, NY and Philadelphia, reading and studying, copying notes using Microfiche microfilm viewer, no cell phones or internet yet. It was course require to know the rules of the Kings and Queens to be successful in International Business Law and Commerce.

Please consider some of what you stated above could be disinformation about 1913. Why because America was rich, very rich. Yes, the English Crown was broke again as they were in 1500s and 1600s. The needed again to take over someone that had what they didn't. America was a business venture at the expense of the American Native Indians and then us and all people. The Crown never got solvent until the partners with Rothschild and the Swiss banksters connected to the Vatican. That didn't stop them from the Opium wars, Hongkong as a British dominion, and Africa for gold and diamonds

Banking
The first use of the Emergency and War Power Act was by George Washington in 1791. Washington used the Emergency Power portion of the Act. And we were not at war. This was to enable Washington, at Hamilton’s insistence, to use an existing private bank, controlled by the Crown through its British Board of Trade, to become the First Bank of the United States. Jefferson and two other men wrote constantly to Washington telling him that there was no such authority in the Constitution to create a bank. Neither Jefferson nor the other two men could sway Washington. The deal was already agreed to for King George he was already made Arch-treasure of the United States of America in 1783. Using the Emergency Powers Act, they went ahead and created the First Bank of the United States. Also, at this time he overlaid the states into "districts of the United States." He did this so that those state banks, who after the creation of the first Bank, were forced to contract with the First Bank in New York so they could continue to operate with United States money. (In the Treaty look for the mention of New York) Washington did this because the United States deposited all the money it collected into all the private banks in each of the states from before the Revolutionary war to the institution of the first Bank of the United States. (England was broke and very vulnerable/weak) The United States (the King's local government) wanted to centralize all its accounts in this First Bank while allowing the hundreds of other banks scattered throughout all the states to continue to hold its money.

This is much like the corporate takeovers of today, where a large bank absorbs small banks that continue to operate as satellite banks with all the accounts having to clear through the parent bank. This then allowed the foreign British controlled bank to more easily collect and pay back the debt owed the Crown by the State and United States as was directed in Article VI of the United States Constitution. What about We the People?

The First Bank of the United States was not at all owned by the Congress but was privately controlled by the British Board of Trade stockholders. The Bank, if begun in France, would be called the First Bank of France. Do not let the terminology fool you into thinking that it was a Bank created by Congress. The ownership was foreign. The "foreigners," noted as Stockholders, were many Americans and therefore, foreigners to the international banking industry. Most of these foreign bankers came from England. Chief Justice John Marshal held the second highest shares in this bank. The documents I have, show that Marshall was considered a "foreign stockholder." He was foreign because the bank was a foreign concern operating within America. Marshall, being a United States citizen, was a foreign Stockholder.

The Tories were helpful in setting the stage for the inception of the Bank. The Tories were people controlled and working for the King. The King did not necessarily want the Rothschilds or the Lombards to take control of the first bank in the United States. However, it took time and the Rothschilds got in to bail out the Crown to this date. The King wanted his bank of England to control the first bank. This setup went back to the Treaty of 1783 and emanated from that treaty and those created after that.

So, here we are today talking about this with no action for corrective actions. Glad to know you have interest in this subject material. IMHO nothing should be more important than exploring for how to get back what is owed to us. Trump gave us and the world notice at a UN meeting for how he recognizes us and only a hand full of people responded. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZjAVbgBIJPA A week later I was at the Trump Winery on business, and all were amazed of the lack of response. Trump is the only President that uttered those words of our recognized status and the American people slept on it.
I told my wine business partners the people don't know what sovereignty is and others may associate is with a negative as Sovereign Citizen which is unknown to them as an oxymoron. You cannot be both, Free and a Subject. they don't know what their country was design to be by the Constitution or don't care to know in their bliss of complacency for status quo.

RobertV2

There's nothing wrong with trying to keep the vote secure, as long as it doesn't stop legitimate voters from voting.

So, no, I _don't_ disagree with _that_.

Stopping large numbers of legitimate voters from voting (such as in the examples I described in two recent posts) _is_ definitely voter-suppression.

Worse yet, pretending to attempt to keep the vote secure, when the real purpose is to stop a large number of legitimate voters from voting, is really bad voter-suppression.

The burden of proof is:

on Kemp (in the first example) (40,000 legitimate voters stopped because he as secretary of state failed to register them for four years even after having been reminded of it, and so then they couldn't vote in the election in which he was both controlling the election process (as secretary of state) and running in it for governor; and there were only miniscule numbers, if any at all, of actual voter fraud uncovered);

and on Kobach (in the second example) (a few hundred thousand legitimate voters stopped, because he shipped out instructions to many secretaries of states telling them to ignore discrepancies in his purging system, in which most of his purge list _did_ have significant discrepancies, resulting in hundreds of thousands of legitimate voters being wrongly purged; and there were only miniscule numbers, if any at all, of actual voter fraud uncovered).

I guess that you didn't really pay much attention to the examples I posted from the book.

This next part is satire:

You could make the vote even more secure by not allowing _anybody_ to vote, except Kemp to vote for himself, Kobach or Trump to vote for Trump, and Putin to vote for Putin. There's nothing wrong with attempting to keep the vote secure as long as it doesn't keep the important voters from voting. (This is a satirical paragraph.)

Radiance3

================
Thanks, very interesting! Reading all these create me lots of questions. How did we survive all these years devoid of all these if facts to be told as true. Did the Founders who signed our Declaration and the Constitution just ignored all these? Fact is perhaps only 10% are aware of these historical events that happed after the Revolutionary wars. The British continued holding our sovereign rights underneath, but while we truly pledge our allegiance to the flag and our constitution.

Yes, I think the British after the war, still control of our banking system, using an American investor to fund the bank. That is clever enough cause the bank was located in the US, but US did not own it.

The US Banking system where the British had ownership and control in 1781. That does not seem to be active at present.

These Federal Reserve of 1913, created under president Woodrow Wilson., and approved by Congress, under the Federal Reserve Act. Although creating the National Bank called the Federal Reserve Banks shares of stocks were initially owned by the Rothchild.
These 12 Banks are located in different cities of the US. The Federal Reserves requires all depository institutions to put a required deposit as reserves It also do the following: Conducting national monetary policy, supervising and regulating banks, maintaining financial stability, and providing banking services.

The Federal Reserve Banks serve as fiscal and depository agents for the United States government. It is also called the Central Bank of the United States.

These Federal Reserve Banks are owned by the United States government. It was incorporated under a fund initiated from the shares invested by the Rothchild of London.
That is why , it is a government and a corporation.

Notes: I focus on the Banking system cause these are the ones that interest me most. Banking, money, and business.

Ri-chard Loc: 23322

Same here, I focus on following the money to connect the dots of fraud and usury of us.

See if you agree with this as solution for returning us back to what we are owed - and enforceable constitution and it starts at the local level.
If we could get a large majority in each State or just one state to start understanding the the US Constitution is our employment contract that we give to our employees as our representatives and focus on Article IV Section 4 demanding our Congress persons complete this Law. As i said before the template for the States Constitution has been written in the Constitution and Declaration of Independence. Those words per Section 4 shall be implemented in the State Constitution as the foundation of our Republican form of government per the US Constitution. How could anyone of We the People be against that action. It's the Law! And We give our Consent.

2nd. All elected and appointed government officials Shall take a new oath in total context (employment contract) repeating the words "this Constitution For the United States OF AMERICA" and then sign a copy of the State Constitution as well the US Constitution as their complete understanding. We Rule!
Immediately the term Citizen changes because we are no longer a subject being told of the rights we have. We are the boss of our employed representative proven Legally and Lawfully by their signed contract giving their consent.
Let you mind wonder for what should/shall come next in baby steps as not to disrupt in any negative way the existing services being provided. A think tank among us would be required to make sure we do no harm to anyone or their property and possessions. The Federal government now begins to be put in their place with their very limited role per the Constitution We the People gave them as Their employment contract.

If we can do this, the first State to do so will be the template for all others to follow. it could easily be a snowball affect even if it moves a little slow at the start.

Follow the money, is where we need to have another think tank about taxation and how that shall be applied, collected, by whom and for what purpose, with a full and open accounting. You and I could brain storm about this maybe to even look at the possibility of a consumer tax and what is to be taxed and by how much per the population and its productivity toward goods and services delivered. The financially support to the Federal Government would be the responsibility of our State's Treasury from a portion collected from the State's Consumer tax to support the Fed's limited role. Can you say goodbye to the NGO called the IRS?

In matters like this there are no bad suggestions as they are always a cause for a better suggestion.

RobertV2

You wrote more, but this is as far as I read. I don't have much patience for being stereotyped like that.

If you use the phrase "I believe", you are in your area of expertise.

(That's because you're in a position to know your own mind better than anybody else does.)

If you use the phrase "you believe", you are in the other person's area of expertise.

(That's because the other person is in a position to know his/her own mind better than anybody else does.)

Radiance3

==================
"Believe in something" No, not an expression of expertise. That's my understanding based on the statement I've read, and based on how I feel. The internal effects on my thoughts and feeling arrived me to that belief.

I don't enforce others to believe me. But just my own. If they have other belief system, that's their choice. People think differently, and the clarity of their thoughts are expressed through belief system or just a thought.

What do you want me to say? I think? Let me review what I said.

Ri-chard Loc: 23322

Don't get baited by children in adult bodies with off topic tripe comments.

Radiance3

==============
Robert, I have been searching for the reply I wrote stating "I believe" Could not find it.

I think you are so sensitive of these issues. I received worst than that from time to time from the left bloggers. I ignored them. Sorry if I offended you. My expressions were based on the substance of the message I read. Thanks for your patience.

Radiance3

===============
Ri-chard, you are a patriot. This is a very interesting challenging, and huge project to undertake. And it also faces lots of obstacles waiting ahead.

Reading some parts of the Constitution, I see that for almost 232 years of implementation, there are some provisions that have been changed, due to legislative actions. Article IV, section 4, have some compelling issues waiting to be fixed.

What you are thinking about is a very huge undertaking. We could not just do it by ourselves. Perhaps you are a lot younger than I am. My energy has faded away over time. I was very active when I was younger. Fact is I wish I am 40 years old again. I want to challenge the US Treasury which I believe Janet Yellin is doing a very poor job when her policies are not favorable to economic growth. I wonder why.

Now, what we can do is support those in Congress and the WH, who will listen to the Conservative causes for our country. We are a Republic and not a democratic government. But the left has abused it thru fraud, making it democratic. That is why Joe Biden invited tens of millions of illegals to make them the majority, along with providing naturalization to the DACA and their families.

We must focus on choosing and supporting the qualified people to be in Congress, at the WH. The SC depends who is in charge of the WH, and who controls Congress.

Good luck and good night.