Emotion vs Logic.
Let’s face it many people on both sides of an argument act out of emotion. However; because of my profession (finance/fiduciary) I work logically. Financial decisions made on emotion seldom turn out well.
Same in politics. Progressives tell us they are all about minorities and if you dispute one of their policies you are suddenly not just someone who disagrees, but a racist, Nazi, bigot, and any other debate ending term they can think of. Emotionally progressives put in place these radical D.A.’s who promised no bail, no charges etc.. Reasoning; The minority community isn’t treated fairly because, of privilege, money, opportunity, or a myriad of other excuses. That argument is all emotion.
Logically one should look at the results of these emotional policies. Since the inception of these progressive polices, who has suffered the most? Minority communities. Logic would tell us since these facts are indisputable that those pushing these policies really care more about politics than lives.
JFlorio wrote:
Let’s face it many people on both sides of an argument act out of emotion. However; because of my profession (finance/fiduciary) I work logically. Financial decisions made on emotion seldom turn out well.
Same in politics. Progressives tell us they are all about minorities and if you dispute one of their policies you are suddenly not just someone who disagrees, but a racist, Nazi, bigot, and any other debate ending term they can think of. Emotionally progressives put in place these radical D.A.’s who promised no bail, no charges etc.. Reasoning; The minority community isn’t treated fairly because, of privilege, money, opportunity, or a myriad of other excuses. That argument is all emotion.
Logically one should look at the results of these emotional policies. Since the inception of these progressive polices, who has suffered the most? Minority communities. Logic would tell us since these facts are indisputable that those pushing these policies really care more about politics than lives.
Let’s face it many people on both sides of an argu... (
show quote)
You are EXACTLY right!
Lefttists determine whether a proposed project is 'good' or 'bad' on how it makes them feel. NEVER on whether or not it will accomplish the desired goal. As a result, it never does.
They approve or disapprove of a candidate based on his affiliation and on what they think motivates him. NEVER on what he says and what he does.
They judge any Republican that sides with them to be honest and fighting for constituents. Yet any Democrat who does not toe the party line is a despicable corrupt villian that is pandering to the rich.
I could go on, but the point is that you are correct, J.
RandyBrian wrote:
You are EXACTLY right!
Lefttists determine whether a proposed project is 'good' or 'bad' on how it makes them feel. NEVER on whether or not it will accomplish the desired goal. As a result, it never does.
They approve or disapprove of a candidate based on his affiliation and on what they think motivates him. NEVER on what he says and what he does.
They judge any Republican that sides with them to be honest and fighting for constituents. Yet any Democrat who does not toe the party line is a despicable corrupt villian that is pandering to the rich.
I could go on, but the point is that you are correct, J.
You are EXACTLY right! br Lefttists determine whet... (
show quote)
The right says a lot , but, they never do anything to benefit the Commons.
The right is guilty of fighting for the rich against democracy every step of the way.
They are not patriots, the rich have no party. They are merely Psychopaths with a lot of money.
Milosia2 wrote:
The right says a lot , but, they never do anything to benefit the Commons.
The right is guilty of fighting for the rich against democracy every step of the way.
They are not patriots, the rich have no party. They are merely Psychopaths with a lot of money.
Good example of emotion Ms Troll.
2quick4u
Loc: Somewhere in central Tx...
RandyBrian wrote:
You are EXACTLY right!
Lefttists determine whether a proposed project is 'good' or 'bad' on how it makes them feel. NEVER on whether or not it will accomplish the desired goal. As a result, it never does.
They approve or disapprove of a candidate based on his affiliation and on what they think motivates him. NEVER on what he says and what he does.
They judge any Republican that sides with them to be honest and fighting for constituents. Yet any Democrat who does not toe the party line is a despicable corrupt villian that is pandering to the rich.
I could go on, but the point is that you are correct, J.
You are EXACTLY right! br Lefttists determine whet... (
show quote)
Randy-they CANNOT allow actual debate on the substance and/or the historical success/failure of any of their ideas.. b/c they all SUCK and/or have historically led to disastrous results..
which any kind of civilized and formal discussion would clearly show. Their ONLY option is to distract and/or outright misrepresent their never-ending schemes..
but only in situations where these snakes know they cannot be legitimately cross-examined nor held accountable for their intentional deceit.. something these cock-sure drama queens now seem very eager/enthusiastic to engage in.. and obviously are well-equipped to perform. Our lamestream media gladly provides the stage for these hateful fools to distract and and demonize their 'enemies' (us) from...
There was a time we were taught that to properly debate, discuss, and/or make important decisions.. you 1st had to remove your emotions (and biases).. and THEN civilly look at/discuss the pertinent 'facts' on record (before opining and/or judging)-those days are definitely gone now. This is not a partisan ideological problem either-both sides now engage in these emotional games...
FJB
2quick4u
Loc: Somewhere in central Tx...
Milosia2 wrote:
The right says a lot , but, they never do anything to benefit the Commons.
The right is guilty of fighting for the rich against democracy every step of the way.
They are not patriots, the rich have no party. They are merely Psychopaths with a lot of money.
That is some award winning projection right there milquetoastia.. Bravo
FJB
Milosia2 wrote:
The right says a lot , but, they never do anything to benefit the Commons.
The right is guilty of fighting for the rich against democracy every step of the way.
They are not patriots, the rich have no party. They are merely Psychopaths with a lot of money.
Why are the majority of the people on earth - 70% to 90% - RIGHT handed?
Who provides employment opportunities for all citizens, the rich or the poor?
Who pays the employees' wages, those with a lot of money or those with very little?
Why did our nation's founders reject out-of-hand democracy as a system of government?
A wise man's heart inclines him to the right, but a fool's heart to the left.Ecclesiastes 10:2
Then he will say to those on his left, ‘Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels.'Matthew 25:41
Rose42 wrote:
Good example of emotion Ms Troll.
Excellently put. Not one fact. Just another LWNJ rant.
Milosia2 wrote:
The right says a lot , but, they never do anything to benefit the Commons.
The right is guilty of fighting for the rich against democracy every step of the way.
They are not patriots, the rich have no party. They are merely Psychopaths with a lot of money.
Still incapable of comprehending common sense
Are you harmful to yourself? Delusional?
JFlorio wrote:
Let’s face it many people on both sides of an argument act out of emotion. However; because of my profession (finance/fiduciary) I work logically. Financial decisions made on emotion seldom turn out well.
Same in politics. Progressives tell us they are all about minorities and if you dispute one of their policies you are suddenly not just someone who disagrees, but a racist, Nazi, bigot, and any other debate ending term they can think of. Emotionally progressives put in place these radical D.A.’s who promised no bail, no charges etc.. Reasoning; The minority community isn’t treated fairly because, of privilege, money, opportunity, or a myriad of other excuses. That argument is all emotion.
Logically one should look at the results of these emotional policies. Since the inception of these progressive polices, who has suffered the most? Minority communities. Logic would tell us since these facts are indisputable that those pushing these policies really care more about politics than lives.
Let’s face it many people on both sides of an argu... (
show quote)
With the assistance of ole Soros.
Milosia2 wrote:
The right says a lot , but, they never do anything to benefit the Commons.
The right is guilty of fighting for the rich against democracy every step of the way.
They are not patriots, the rich have no party. They are merely Psychopaths with a lot of money.
Milooooser2, smoking crack again, I see. The richest greedyist people in the world/USA are predominantly DEMOCRATS. Mr. Facebook and Mr. Twitter want to control your mind by only allowing you to see what they want you to see. Mr. Microsoft, Bill Gates, just wants to kill off 90% of the world's population to honor the Georgia Guidstones inscription. These Democrats and others are despicable people.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.