Victory for Biden Admin...Justice Breyer is retiring...Doesn't change make up of a SCOTUS, but...
proud republican wrote:
https://nypost.com/2022/01/26/supreme-court-justice-stephen-breyer-to-retire/
Exactly! Good way to be rid of camel toe though and put moochie as vice or another dim wit!
Kevyn wrote:
AOC would be a great replacement!
unfortunately you probably are serious!!!
proud republican wrote:
https://nypost.com/2022/01/26/supreme-court-justice-stephen-breyer-to-retire/
What we need is a central forward thinking person to be able to work with the right leaning Justices, one who will not alienate John Roberts Who will then lean Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh as those three Justices seem to find middle ground themselves.
We need a Supreme Court that is not so political. Need more common sense
jimpack123 wrote:
What we need is a central forward thinking person to be able to work with the right leaning Justices, one who will not alienate John Roberts Who will then lean Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh as those three Justices seem to find middle ground themselves.
We need a Supreme Court that is not so political. Need more common sense
I just can't wait to accuse whomever Biden's Handlers nominate of rape.
Hey, this black female raped me 45 years ago, but I don't remember much about it, but I know it was her. And that should be credible enough to stop the nomination.
jimpack123 wrote:
What we need is a central forward thinking person to be able to work with the right leaning Justices, one who will not alienate John Roberts Who will then lean Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh as those three Justices seem to find middle ground themselves.
We need a Supreme Court that is not so political. Need more common sense
>>>>>central forward thinking person
I disagree: We need a person who will follow the Constitution.
“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”
“I will, to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. It is not the Constitution as I would like to have it, but as it is, that is to be defended. The Constitution will not be preserved & defended until it is enforced & obeyed in every part of every one of the United States. It must be so respected, obeyed, enforced and defended, and let the grass grow where it may.”
Lincoln
requires black or lgbtqeio person that is racist be a shoein
Mikeyavelli wrote:
You have to be a black female, that's all. They're measuring the bench to see if Stacey Abrams will fit.
Your bias is clear. Your coffee cup agrees.
American Vet wrote:
>>>>>central forward thinking person
I disagree: We need a person who will follow the Constitution.
“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”
“I will, to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. It is not the Constitution as I would like to have it, but as it is, that is to be defended. The Constitution will not be preserved & defended until it is enforced & obeyed in every part of every one of the United States. It must be so respected, obeyed, enforced and defended, and let the grass grow where it may.”
Lincoln
>>>>>central forward thinking perso... (
show quote)
well the last three Justices have been doing a terrible of job following the Constitution. unfortunately Lincoln's GOP died the that Trump was sworn into office lol
jimpack123 wrote:
well the last three Justices have been doing a terrible of job following the Constitution. unfortunately Lincoln's GOP died the that Trump was sworn into office lol
How so? Got specifics besides your obvious biased opinion?
American Vet wrote:
How so? Got specifics besides your obvious biased opinion?
yawn a opinion is a opinion go back to Fox News lol
American Vet wrote:
So, you got nothing.
OK
the same as you go take care of your dogs and cats lol
jimpack123 wrote:
the same as you go take care of your dogs and cats lol
LOL
I didn't make a spurious claim - you did.
And you seem unwilling to back it up with any proof/evidence/data. Why is that? PS: Don't feel alone in that - most leftoids do the same thing.
Liberty Tree wrote:
Actually, being a lawyer is not required.
Not only that, there are no age, education, job experience,
or citizenship rules restricting justices!!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.