One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
So the voters can't be trusted.
Page <prev 2 of 2
Jan 5, 2022 13:07:21   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
PeterS wrote:
It never occurs to Conservatives that for voter fraud to have occurred as Trump claims it occurred the level of mistrust is astronomical. Part of what was missed in this meme is that Republican Secretaries of State in Georgia and Arizona can't be trusted couldn't be trusted either

So it's the court system: state, federal, appellate, and supreme court packed with conservative judges can't be trusted. His own Attorney General who white-washed the Mueller Report for him can't be trusted. Trump's hand-picked head of election security Chris Krebs can't be trusted. Republican Secretary of State can't be trusted. And of course, it goes without saying that the evile mainstream media can't be trusted...though since they don't trust Conservative judges, a Conservative AG, a Conservative head of election security.

Yet for every man, woman, and child of them; they will believe Donald Trump before they believe anyone else--or think for themselves--to understand that election fraud was an impossibility!

This is what happens when you have people who would rather believe the propaganda fed to them daily...whether it's on talk radio or the opinion news that they listen to religiously rather than listen to news that is vetted by independent sources or thinking for themselves...something they claim to do but all the logical fallacies always seem to get in the way.

Should I go on or just wait for all the denigration and smears to start since that's the only retort that conservatives seem to be able to come up with...
It never occurs to Conservatives that for voter fr... (show quote)
Tyrants love pull toys like you. You're so fkng easy.

Reply
Jan 6, 2022 15:19:03   #
captainwalt Loc: Bay Area
 
PeterS wrote:
It never occurs to Conservatives that for voter fraud to have occurred as Trump claims it occurred the level of mistrust is astronomical. Part of what was missed in this meme is that Republican Secretaries of State in Georgia and Arizona can't be trusted couldn't be trusted either

So it's the court system: state, federal, appellate, and supreme court packed with conservative judges can't be trusted. His own Attorney General who white-washed the Mueller Report for him can't be trusted. Trump's hand-picked head of election security Chris Krebs can't be trusted. Republican Secretary of State can't be trusted. And of course, it goes without saying that the evile mainstream media can't be trusted...though since they don't trust Conservative judges, a Conservative AG, a Conservative head of election security.

Yet for every man, woman, and child of them; they will believe Donald Trump before they believe anyone else--or think for themselves--to understand that election fraud was an impossibility!

This is what happens when you have people who would rather believe the propaganda fed to them daily...whether it's on talk radio or the opinion news that they listen to religiously rather than listen to news that is vetted by independent sources or thinking for themselves...something they claim to do but all the logical fallacies always seem to get in the way.

Should I go on or just wait for all the denigration and smears to start since that's the only retort that conservatives seem to be able to come up with...
It never occurs to Conservatives that for voter fr... (show quote)

Sorry Peter S, you don’t even need to wait for so/called right wing denigration and smears to start before coming to the only “reasonably logical conclusion” about the validity of the 2000 election.
Let’s start out with the so-called ‘bipartisan commission’ which is investigating January 6.
The only two Republicans on the bipartisan commission, Liz Cheney and Adam Kissinger, have already voted to impeach Donald Trump for his actions on January 6. So it’s laughable at the outset to suggest that this is a bipartisan commission. The fact that these turncoats sellouts are Republicans does not mean that this is bipartisan. True Republicans such as Jim Jordan were excluded by Nancy Pelosi from being on the commission.
So we already know where this commission will come out regarding January 6.
00P posters here, such as JW have already explained how with Covid and mail in ballots the outcome can be changed without significant disruption.
rj explained that requiring live voters who are citizens to vote is another huge factor. Agreed!!!!
And Smedley-buzzkill has pointed out how corrupt Georgia and Maricopa county Arizona authorities can change the outcome of several thousand voters so as to change the final result.
But the most persuasive evidence about the results have to come from the viewing of rallies before the election. Trump was filling football stadiums with wildly enthusiastic voters but between Joe and Kamala, they could scarcely fill a cocktail size crowd w voters.
Lastly, absolute disbelief in what could have reasonable happened when ballot counting was simultaneously discontinued in several jurisdictions in the wee, early morning hours because of so/called ‘water leaks’ with results to be completely reversed when counting resumed several hours later.
Only hard core TDS syndrome sufferers like you can dismiss all these coincidinks as “impossible”!

Reply
Jan 6, 2022 15:48:21   #
microphor Loc: Home is TN
 
captainwalt wrote:
Sorry Peter S, you don’t even need to wait for so/called right wing denigration and smears to start before coming to the only “reasonably logical conclusion” about the validity of the 2000 election.
Let’s start out with the so-called ‘bipartisan commission’ which is investigating January 6.
The only two Republicans on the bipartisan commission, Liz Cheney and Adam Kissinger, have already voted to impeach Donald Trump for his actions on January 6. So it’s laughable at the outset to suggest that this is a bipartisan commission. The fact that these turncoats sellouts are Republicans does not mean that this is bipartisan. True Republicans such as Jim Jordan were excluded by Nancy Pelosi from being on the commission.
So we already know where this commission will come out regarding January 6.
00P posters here, such as JW have already explained how with Covid and mail in ballots the outcome can be changed without significant disruption.
rj explained that requiring live voters who are citizens to vote is another huge factor. Agreed!!!!
And Smedley-buzzkill has pointed out how corrupt Georgia and Maricopa county Arizona authorities can change the outcome of several thousand voters so as to change the final result.
But the most persuasive evidence about the results have to come from the viewing of rallies before the election. Trump was filling football stadiums with wildly enthusiastic voters but between Joe and Kamala, they could scarcely fill a cocktail size crowd w voters.
Lastly, absolute disbelief in what could have reasonable happened when ballot counting was simultaneously discontinued in several jurisdictions in the wee, early morning hours because of so/called ‘water leaks’ with results to be completely reversed when counting resumed several hours later.
Only hard core TDS syndrome sufferers like you can dismiss all these coincidinks as “impossible”!
Sorry Peter S, you don’t even need to wait for so/... (show quote)

Bingo

Reply
Jan 7, 2022 03:41:35   #
nonalien1 Loc: Mojave Desert
 
captainwalt wrote:
Sorry Peter S, you don’t even need to wait for so/called right wing denigration and smears to start before coming to the only “reasonably logical conclusion” about the validity of the 2000 election.
Let’s start out with the so-called ‘bipartisan commission’ which is investigating January 6.
The only two Republicans on the bipartisan commission, Liz Cheney and Adam Kissinger, have already voted to impeach Donald Trump for his actions on January 6. So it’s laughable at the outset to suggest that this is a bipartisan commission. The fact that these turncoats sellouts are Republicans does not mean that this is bipartisan. True Republicans such as Jim Jordan were excluded by Nancy Pelosi from being on the commission.
So we already know where this commission will come out regarding January 6.
00P posters here, such as JW have already explained how with Covid and mail in ballots the outcome can be changed without significant disruption.
rj explained that requiring live voters who are citizens to vote is another huge factor. Agreed!!!!
And Smedley-buzzkill has pointed out how corrupt Georgia and Maricopa county Arizona authorities can change the outcome of several thousand voters so as to change the final result.
But the most persuasive evidence about the results have to come from the viewing of rallies before the election. Trump was filling football stadiums with wildly enthusiastic voters but between Joe and Kamala, they could scarcely fill a cocktail size crowd w voters.
Lastly, absolute disbelief in what could have reasonable happened when ballot counting was simultaneously discontinued in several jurisdictions in the wee, early morning hours because of so/called ‘water leaks’ with results to be completely reversed when counting resumed several hours later.
Only hard core TDS syndrome sufferers like you can dismiss all these coincidinks as “impossible”!
Sorry Peter S, you don’t even need to wait for so/... (show quote)



Yup More evidence for fraud then for fair plus the probabilities and bellwether states. Statistics and number of counties won. It's more of an impossiblity that Biden won then pigs can fly.

Reply
Jan 7, 2022 07:45:39   #
microphor Loc: Home is TN
 
nonalien1 wrote:
Yup More evidence for fraud then for fair plus the probabilities and bellwether states. Statistics and number of counties won. It's more of an impossiblity that Biden won then pigs can fly.


True

Reply
Jan 7, 2022 10:19:42   #
Strycker Loc: The middle of somewhere else.
 
nonalien1 wrote:
Yup More evidence for fraud then for fair plus the probabilities and bellwether states. Statistics and number of counties won. It's more of an impossiblity that Biden won then pigs can fly.


Why is it, in Democrat's minds, statistics count as settled science when it comes to Covid or climate change, but, when it comes to statistically nearly impossible odds, they are not proof of fraud with voting? The hypocrisy is astounding.

Reply
Jan 7, 2022 10:26:39   #
microphor Loc: Home is TN
 
Strycker wrote:
Why is it, in Democrat's minds, statistics count as settled science when it comes to Covid or climate change, but, when it comes to statistically nearly impossible odds, they are not proof of fraud with voting? The hypocrisy is astounding.


Exactly!

Reply
Jan 7, 2022 10:39:25   #
Big dog
 
Strycker wrote:
Why is it, in Democrat's minds, statistics count as settled science when it comes to Covid or climate change, but, when it comes to statistically nearly impossible odds, they are not proof of fraud with voting? The hypocrisy is astounding.


Beyond astounding, astonishing, or whatever. It’s completely ludicrous !!!!!!!!

Reply
Jan 7, 2022 11:10:17   #
captainwalt Loc: Bay Area
 
Strycker wrote:
Why is it, in Democrat's minds, statistics count as settled science when it comes to Covid or climate change, but, when it comes to statistically nearly impossible odds, they are not proof of fraud with voting? The hypocrisy is astounding.


Ah yes! The inconvenient truth of irrefutable statistics.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.