Garland Cleared The Air On Politicizing Indictments for Those Who Broke The Law: Garland has been coming under increasing criticism for not going after those in trump's administration...

woodguru

Garland has been coming under increasing criticism for not going after those in trump's administration involved in attempting to overturn the election.

Of course the right will scream and yell about any attempts to hold anyone accountable being nothing but overreach by the Biden administration going after trump people the left hates. Meanwhile the left sees it as avoiding any optics of political bias, saying that not going after anyone that broke the law is worse than using the office to go after political foes.

Well, Garland made it clear that he intends to act with a blind eye towards any political agendas, and adhere to the rule of law. He vowed that anyone including those at the top who have broken laws will be prosecuted...

In conjunction with that the house has indicated that they will be pursuing the clearly stated letter of the law pertaining to interfering with the faithful execution of election procedures, and that there could be as many as a thousand people with sights set on them for criminal prosecution referrals. There has already been talk that over a hundred republicans could be in violation of supporting an attempted coup.

Liberty Tree

woodguru wrote:

Garland has been coming under increasing criticism... (show quote)

No blind eye with Garland. Both of his eyes are fixed on Republican enemies. Selective prosecution will reign. Only positive is he is not on the SCOTUS.

Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio

woodguru wrote:

Garland has been coming under increasing criticism... (show quote)

This should free up a few Congressional Seats.
To allow them to continue as Congressmen is ludicrous.

Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio

Liberty Tree wrote:

No blind eye with Garland. Both of his eyes are fixed on Republican enemies. Selective prosecution will reign. Only positive is he is not on the SCOTUS.

Selective Prosecution ?
That’s funny right there.!
That is not what this is. The Insurrectionists know who they are. The seditionists know who they are . The traitors know who they are. They are easy to find because they are the ones who still think they are right, and everyone else is wrong.
That is not selective prosecution. Selective Prosecution is a Nazi Tool used to arrest civilians who are against the status quo. And used to harass opponents.

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

Liberty Tree wrote:

No blind eye with Garland. Both of his eyes are fixed on Republican enemies. Selective prosecution will reign. Only positive is he is not on the SCOTUS.

SGM B Loc: TEXAS but live in Alabama now

woodguru wrote:

Garland has been coming under increasing criticism... (show quote)

Really? I guess I missed that.
“There has already been talk that over a hundred republicans could be in violation of supporting an attempted coup.”
Which bunch of buffoons are doing the talking? Sounds like it might be Adam Shit and the RINO Liz Cheney.

WEBCO

woodguru wrote:

Garland has been coming under increasing criticism... (show quote)

There was no attempted coup. Your following of the Democratic propaganda is strong. Most Americans know this "insurrection" talk is nothing but political theatrics and couldn't care less about January 6th.

SGM B Loc: TEXAS but live in Alabama now

Milosia2 wrote:

Selective Prosecution ?
That’s funny right there.!
That is not what this is. The Insurrectionists know who they are. The seditionists know who they are . The traitors know who they are. They are easy to find because they are the ones who still think they are right, and everyone else is wrong.
That is not selective prosecution. Selective Prosecution is a Nazi Tool used to arrest civilians who are against the status quo. And used to harass opponents.

Well hell, oh magnanimous one - tell us, if you can - the name of any protester who has been charged, or convicted of “insurrection”. 🧐🧐

LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago

Milosia2 wrote:

Selective Prosecution ?
That’s funny right there.!
That is not what this is. The Insurrectionists know who they are. The seditionists know who they are . The traitors know who they are. They are easy to find because they are the ones who still think they are right, and everyone else is wrong.
That is not selective prosecution. Selective Prosecution is a Nazi Tool used to arrest civilians who are against the status quo. And used to harass opponents.

EWE are really a sad case

LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago

Is that the tattoo on your left ball. The large one. The size of a marble.

microphor Loc: Home is TN

woodguru wrote:

Garland has been coming under increasing criticism... (show quote)

Blah, blah, blah. The fact that you need evidence and not Demoncrat mind reading may have something to do with that.

microphor Loc: Home is TN

SGM B wrote:

Really? I guess I missed that.
“There has already been talk that over a hundred republicans could be in violation of supporting an attempted coup.”
Which bunch of buffoons are doing the talking? Sounds like it might be Adam Shit and the RINO Liz Cheney.

Well if there's been "talk", it must be true. Evidence unnecessary?

crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island

woodguru wrote:

Garland has been coming under increasing criticism... (show quote)

He should be prosecuting Christopher Wray.

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

crazylibertarian wrote:

He should be prosecuting Christopher Wray.

For what?

crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island

Bad Bob wrote:

For what?

For abuse of the Constitution.