One Religion In This Country Takes Us Against Everything This Country Stands For (Page 4): ...and every "good" Muslim feels the same way about Islam. So Flynn, like them is FREE to...

Sonny Magoo Loc: Where pot pie is boiled in a kettle

woodguru wrote:

The idea Flynn expressed is repugnant to the core. How is this one master religion thing even supposed to work? It couldn't help but denigrate any other religious beliefs to a back seat where they mean nothing...and are court systems supposed to somehow recognize and somehow place a higher relevance to this national religion?

I can't help but think even many conservatives would agree that this was a truly ridiculous idea.

...and every "good" Muslim feels the same way about Islam. So Flynn, like them is FREE to express how he views the world.
Got a problem with that?

kemmer

bylm1-Bernie wrote:

Wait a minute, Kemmer. I believe you said religio... (show quote)

Evangelicals say the Bible is the inerrant word of God, but when I mention the silly prohibitions in Leviticus, they counter that Christians aren’t bound by the Mosaic Law.
(Except when one or two items coincide with Christian prejudices, of course, then they become inerrant.)

kemmer

Sonny Magoo wrote:

...and every "good" Muslim feels the same way about Islam. So Flynn, like them is FREE to express how he views the world.
Got a problem with that?

Flynn can blather all the nonsense he wants; the problem is the sadly impressionable people who believe him.

Iliamna1

Thanks, Randy. I, also, read the clips and you're quite right Woody either DIDN'T read the full transcript, or DELIBERATELY made his usual errant deductions.

bylm1-Bernie

kemmer wrote:

Evangelicals say the Bible is the inerrant word of God, but when I mention the silly prohibitions in Leviticus, they counter that Christians aren’t bound by the Mosaic Law.
(Except when one or two items coincide with Christian prejudices, of course, then they become inerrant.)

I think I've covered this with you before, Kemmer, but I'll take the time to explain it again, for all the good it will do, but not right now. I need to go out for coffee with my step-son. Catch you later. Bernie

kemmer

bylm1-Bernie wrote:

I think I've covered this with you before, Kemmer, but I'll take the time to explain it again, for all the good it will do, but not right now. I need to go out for coffee with my step-son. Catch you later. Bernie

I can hardly wait. 🙄

RandyBrian Loc: Texas

kemmer wrote:

Evangelicals say the Bible is the inerrant word of God, but when I mention the silly prohibitions in Leviticus, they counter that Christians aren’t bound by the Mosaic Law.
(Except when one or two items coincide with Christian prejudices, of course, then they become inerrant.)

Some people (I'll not mention any names) are unable to tell the difference between an absolute and something that depends on circumstances. Here are two examples:
#1 Thou shalt not kill. Except that the Bible gives numerous examples of when it IS proper and moral to kill. It depends on motivation (known only by God) and circumstances.
#2 Thou shalt not commit adultery. There are NO examples in the Bible where adultery is acceptable or moral. Thus, it is inerrant, and is a sin.
On a side note, in spite of decades of leftists trying to alter the meaning, adultery is sexual activity OF ANY KIND between people who are not a married man and wife. Yes, our legal code reads differently, but I refer you to a higher authority than the government.

kemmer

RandyBrian wrote:

#2 Thou shalt not commit adultery. There are NO examples in the Bible where adultery is acceptable or moral. Thus, it is inerrant, and is a sin.
On a side note, in spite of decades of leftists trying to alter the meaning, adultery is sexual activity OF ANY KIND between people who are not a married man and wife. Yes, our legal code reads differently, but I refer you to a higher authority than the government.

And thank God for that; else over half the country would be in jail. 😅

woodguru

Sonny Magoo wrote:

...and every "good" Muslim feels the same way about Islam. So Flynn, like them is FREE to express how he views the world.
Got a problem with that?

Actually people are not free to destroy and piss on the constitution as pertains to making such idiotic ideas the law of the land

kemmer

Randy wrote:

…adultery is sexual activity OF ANY KIND between people who are not a married man and wife.

You need to learn the difference between adultery and fornication.

RandyBrian Loc: Texas

kemmer wrote:

You need to learn the difference between adultery and fornication.

Either one is a sin in the eyes of God. And He is the only one whose opinion really matters., because His opinion has eternal consequences.

Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois

kemmer wrote:

You need to learn the difference between adultery and fornication.

You need to learn the difference between absolute and subjective.

RandyBrian Loc: Texas

RandyBrian wrote:

Either one is a sin in the eyes of God. And He is the only one whose opinion really matters., because His opinion has eternal consequences.

And the difference is beside the point. You and I have covered the meaning of adultery before.
This particular subject is about you willfully not knowing how to read and understand the Bible. And, perhaps, your choosing to only obey the ones that you claim justify the sins you like to commit.

RandyBrian Loc: Texas

Parky60 wrote:

You need to learn the difference between absolute and subjective.

Few things are absolute. The Bible is one of them.

keepuphope Loc: Idaho

RandyBrian wrote:

Either one is a sin in the eyes of God. And He is the only one whose opinion really matters., because His opinion has eternal consequences.