Singularity

Just like Radiance3, you weirdly at times don't give sources for your "data" nor explain (understand?) the implications and the point of the information you supply when you get all excited.

34 cases don't seem a representative sample... especially SINCE as noted MOST RAPES AREN'T REPORTED, much less successfully prosecuted, the researched cases of legally prosecuted rape do not represent any quantitative relationship to the worries at hand.

My point here is to heighten the concern over and elucidate the voting implications of the Texas SB8's implications for any husband who has a fertile spouse that could ever possibly be impregnated by a rapist. If that number is 1, it matters to one voter, and maybe their spouse, and other children, and friends and community, and family, the country at large, so I dunno, just putting it out there....

I am sure voters will be affected by concern over many issues, but perhaps some migbt be swayed due to concern over this "abortion bill" AS WELL AS spurred to consider, alternatively, an increased motivation to address the governor's newfound interest in sorting out the rape problem and perhaps incidentally its implications on child custody and support obligations.

TexaCan Loc: Homeward Bound!

OFF TOPIC………but since you opened up this can of worms! 😎

“WE” have not written anything vulgar or any Porn! The person that you jumped in to defend is the person that wrote it on Knitting PARADISE and was reposted here……..Penelope Huckleberry who is kitty kitty here wrote it! She was banned from KP because of her vulgar mouth and her extremely violent temper! Surprise surprise! Sound familiar! She reincarnated and is now posting under a new name……..…🤷🏻‍♀️

Lots of evidence! Her husband’s initials are DH, same cat picture of Noodles on KP and Turdley here, which came from a cat meme picture! You would think that she would be smart enough not to post the cat meme! Lol! She claimed they used part of an famous antique ship to make their house AND got caught in the elaborate lie. A picture of the ship was on the Internet! She used the term, The Derelict Ship Maggie’s Revenge in reference to the Ship and her home on KP and she uses it as part of her avatar on OPP. Lots more evidence but that is enough to prove that she is both of the lovely classy ladies! 😂 😊

So, the person that will ultimately be guilty of porn is the person that started this mess, kitty kitty and all her other personalities! Also, do you realize that the owners of this forum will also be held responsible for allowing these posts to remain in pubic…..or was that part of your plan? I have read two times that you have complained that you got “final” warnings, once this year and once last year!

You know if some straight laced religious fanatic got this upset over that one post, it would make sense, but for you…….big surprise! You have made some “porn” statements yourself in your anti-God statements for years!

I doubt very seriously if the FBI spend any time on this ridiculous complaint of yours after they start their investigation with you! LOL! They have a lot more serious problems to worry about. Especially since Biden became president! Now that’s a real investigation!

Singularity

If this post is removed, we know ADMIN still has at least autonomic reflexes...

They never listen in when you're just talking to yourself.

Singularity

quote=Singularity to Bladerunner's earlier post:

Just like Radiance3, you weirdly at times don't give sources for your "data" nor explain (understand?) the implications and the point of the information you supply when you get all excited.

34 cases don't seem a representative sample... especially SINCE as noted MOST RAPES AREN'T REPORTED, much less successfully prosecuted, the researched cases of legally prosecuted rape do not represent any quantitative relationship to the worries at hand.

My point here is to heighten the concern over and elucidate the voting implications of the Texas SB8's implications for any spouse who has a fertile spouse (lesbian marriages have two!) that could ever possibly be impregnated by a rapist. Even if that number is 1, it matters to that one voter, and maybe the spouse, and other children, and friends and community, and family, the country at large, so I dunno, just putting it out there....

I am sure voters will be affected by concern over many issues, but perhaps some migbt be swayed due to concern over this "abortion bill" AS WELL AS spurred to consider, alternatively, an increased motivation to address the governor's newfound interest in sorting out the rape problem and perhaps incidentally its implications on child custody and support obligations. /quote

Sorry for the interruption.

TexaCan Loc: Homeward Bound!

Thank you, Thank you very much…….for making my point! 😇

Singularity

No, my point is it's not pornographic nor does it insult anyone.

It does contain a commonly used vulgar word used in public discourse among friends, strangers, even children. So, it is within this Forums published guidelines.

We've all BEEN through this before, of course.

In the following research study, some posts were removed, some not. Many removed were still represented in quote reply from others. Make any sense?
https://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/tpr?p=2592629&t=142556

QUOTING EXAMPLES!

Singularity

quote=Singularity= quote=Singularity to Bladerunner's earlier post:

Just like Radiance3, you weirdly at times don't give sources for your "data" nor explain (understand?) the implications and the point of the information you supply when you get all excited.

34 cases don't seem a representative sample... especially SINCE as noted MOST RAPES AREN'T REPORTED, much less successfully prosecuted, the researched cases of legally prosecuted rape do not represent any quantitative relationship to the worries at hand.

My point here is to heighten the concern over and elucidate the voting implications of the Texas SB8's implications for any spouse who has a fertile spouse (lesbian marriages have two!) that could ever possibly be impregnated by a rapist. Even if that number is 1, it matters to that one voter, and maybe the spouse, and other children, and friends and community, and family, the country at large, so I dunno, just putting it out there....

I am sure voters will be affected by concern over many issues, but perhaps some migbt be swayed due to concern over this "abortion bill" AS WELL AS spurred to consider, alternatively, an increased motivation to address the governor's newfound interest in sorting out the rape problem and perhaps incidentally its implications on child custody and support obligations.

Sorry for the interruption, again...

albertk

OFF TOPIC

Do I have to make another big pot of chili for the agents in TWO years?
I suppose I could make two pots. I think I'll hire a cleaning lady and a
lawn service.

Singularity

TRIGGER WARNING:

POSSIBLE TORTURE PORN CONTENT: I do not read this person's posts because this previous one already wasted enough groceries.

Singularity

quote=Singularity=
quote=Singularity= quote=Singularity to Bladerunner's earlier post:

Just like Radiance3, you weirdly at times don't give sources for your "data" nor explain (understand?) the implications and the point of the information you supply when you get all excited.

34 cases don't seem a representative sample... especially SINCE as noted MOST RAPES AREN'T REPORTED, much less successfully prosecuted, the researched cases of legally prosecuted rape do not represent any quantitative relationship to the worries at hand.

My point here is to heighten the concern over and elucidate the voting implications of the Texas SB8's implications for any spouse who has a fertile spouse (lesbian marriages have two!) that could ever possibly be impregnated by a rapist. Even if that number is 1, it matters to that one voter, and maybe the spouse, and other children, and friends and community, and family, the country at large, so I dunno, just putting it out there....

I am sure voters will be affected by concern over many issues, but perhaps some migbt be swayed due to concern over this "abortion bill" AS WELL AS spurred to consider, alternatively, an increased motivation to address the governor's newfound interest in sorting out the rape problem and perhaps incidentally its implications on child custody and support obligations.

Sorry for that person's interruption, again... and again.

EmilyD

OFF TOPIC

You could freeze dry one of the pots of stew and store it for whenever they show up at your door. That way you don't have to keep making it and making it on the off chance that they appear at your door and you are ill prepared. You DO NOT want to be ill prepared for when the FBI comes a-knockin'. That would be in very bad form, indeed!!

Since you are making chili, I'll do the same, but with my beef stew.

Singularity

quote=Singularity
quote=Singularity=
quote=Singularity= quote=Singularity to Bladerunner's earlier post:

Just like Radiance3, you weirdly at times don't give sources for your "data" nor explain (understand?) the implications and the point of the information you supply when you get all excited.

34 cases don't seem a representative sample... especially SINCE as noted MOST RAPES AREN'T REPORTED, much less successfully prosecuted, the researched cases of legally prosecuted rape do not represent any quantitative relationship to the worries at hand.

My point here is to heighten the concern over and elucidate the voting implications of the Texas SB8's implications for any spouse who has a fertile spouse (lesbian marriages have two!) that could ever possibly be impregnated by a rapist. Even if that number is 1, it matters to that one voter, and maybe the spouse, and other children, and friends and community, and family, the country at large, so I dunno, just putting it out there....

I am sure voters will be affected by concern over many issues, but perhaps some migbt be swayed due to concern over this "abortion bill" AS WELL AS spurred to consider, alternatively, an increased motivation to address the governor's newfound interest in sorting out the rape problem and perhaps incidentally its implications on child custody and support obligations.

Sorry for that person's interruption, again... and over and over, again.

How ridiculously stupid do they intend to try to make me look, here? It is time for off topic dinner. I've been fixing a big casserole.

Tomato Surprise.

No tomatoes in it.

That's the surprise! Just a bunch of shredded veggies, chopped tofu, legumes and a big protective chunk of plausable deniability by hereafter maintaining my innocent behavior, ignoring the identity games as I'd planned before you decided you somehow needed to frame me with them.

I'd like to think you targeted me as a strong debater you couldn't prevail over without cheating, but I doubt you possess the perspicacity to carry off the production of that complicated a concept. It's probably that as an atheist and one who frequently tests the boundaries of the ADMIN's compliance with the First Ammendment you could arouse emotions in simple God fearing folks like Radiance3 and others to tar and feather the scapegoat they already distrust.

Like any good story this one and all it's layers has a nugget of truth and a ton of paranoia. I don't like this game. I'd like to go back to being able to ignore it and talk about politics and current world events. The mesger contents of these collective minds do not interest me further. Please play happily out of my way.

albertk

OFF TOPIC

I'm thinking of having a gourmet chef on stand-by.
I'm exhausted!

I just had a new front door installed. I hope the agents are polite and ring
the doorbell.

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

IMHO, it is way past time for decent folks to abandon this thread. It's taken on a decidedly profane flavor.

If my wife had been impregnated by a rapist, I'd have nailed the SOB's pecker to a tree, set the tree on fire, and given him a butter knife.

(How's that for some porn?)

My wife and I would raise the baby as our own, regardless of the little one's skin color.

That's all I have to say.

Singularity