If your wife were to be raped.. (Page 24): No...... I was shaking in my boots and hid under the bed for an hour. I just came out, covered in dust bunnies, and decided to get the...

EmilyD

albertk wrote:

Anyone hear from the FBI or Homeland Security?

I cut the grass, cleaned the house and made a big pot of chili for the agents.

No one showed up!

No...... I was shaking in my boots and hid under the bed for an hour. I just came out, covered in dust bunnies, and decided to get the vacuum. They might have come to the door, but the noise probably drowned them out.

EmilyD

Singularity wrote:

Not off topic.

Check the heading. The new Texas law and its implications for legality of abortions in the cases of a rape impregnated spouse....

I thought the topic was "If your wife were to be raped...."

Singularity

EmilyD wrote:

No...... I was shaking in my boots and hid under the bed for an hour. I just came out, covered in dust bunnies, and decided to get the vacuum. They might have come to the door, but the noise probably drowned them out.

Your consciousness of guilt is also off topic.

As well as uninteresting now.

Singularity

EmilyD wrote:

I thought the topic was "If your wife were to be raped...."

Did you read and comprehend the "..."? In the TITLE for the TOPIC?

I cannot help your reading comprehension problem other than to tiresomely point it out again. And again.

As it is already obvious, I would need not bother, except to satisfy a desire to avenge petty annoyances best ignored.

Unless they rear their ugly heads and form stumbling blocks to the legitimate discourse in a thread I am hosting.

EmilyD

Singularity wrote:

I cannot help your reading comprehension problem other than to tiresomely point it out again. And again.

As it is already obvious, I would need not bother, except to satisfy a desire to avenge petty annoyances best ignored

Unless they rear their ugly heads and form stumbling blocks to the legitimate discourse in a thread I am hosting.

A thread you are hosting....😂🤣😅😄❕❕❕❕❕

Where's that FBI? 😳😳😳

Singularity

EmilyD wrote:

A thread you are hosting....😂🤣😅😄❕❕❕❕❕

Where's that FBI? 😳😳😳

It was I who asked the question in the title and published it in a thread under my avatar. And in a Socratic manner, I developed the topic! So having begun the inquisition, I am the master inquisitor on this thread as well as the judge of what I FIND topical and interesting. I may not control or limit the subjects, Subjects or their productions. I may only choose how and when to respond. Or not.

See? I had already posted that info and you had read past it and are still off topic and reading comprehension impaired.

And peculiarly needy in regards to details of the reporting for a problem from which you have been cleared of any wrongdoing!?

~

THE FULLY DEVELOPED TOPIC FOR READING AND COMPREHENSION IMPAIRED PERSONS.

Singularity

BigMike wrote:

No.

A shout out to son of witless's argument,

When does a RAPE BABY begin to exist?

the Bible wrote:

Matthew 5:28, NIV: "But I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart."

When a RAPIST first has guilty ruminations, or after implantation?

Recall that medically/technically, a woman or fertile child is "pregnant" at the beginning of the menstrual cycle which ultimately results in implantation of a conceptus that might not have implanted until two to three weeks into the process!

EmilyD

Singularity wrote:

It was I who asked the question in the title and p... (show quote)

Master inquisitor and judge! On a forum?!!

So.....You created a topic on OPP titled "If your wife were to be raped...." and put it out there for all who are members here to comment on. And now you are saying because you are the "master inquisitor" of this topic you started, that you are the "judge" of what the members of this forum have to say about it?

In case you're not clear on where you are at the moment, this is a public internet forum where its members can post topics for discussion and read and reply to messages written by other participants. Once you hit that "send" button on your original post, it becomes the property of the forum owners, and is open for discussion about anything by its members. The subject of a topic can change many times as the discussion evolves within the thread, as it has on THIS thread. It's the way forums work.

Singularity

EmilyD wrote:

Master inquisitor and judge! On a forum?!! br br... (show quote)

And I, equally, choose how I respond. It's the way conversation works.

If my persona, confidence and rhetorical competence convey mutual respect and authority that induces others to admire and conform to my WISHES AS POSTED, when I ask assertively, even without authority, and it improves my enjoyment AND effective use of the forum, without breaking any rules?

Survival of the fittest, baby!

We each individually, must choose how to RESPOND when we step in something and get it on our shoe.

EmilyD

Singularity wrote:

And I, equally, choose how I respond.

If my persona, confidence and rhetorical competence confer mutual respect and authority that induces others to admire and conform to my WISHES AS POSTED, and it improves my enjoyment AND effective use of the forum, without breaking any rules?

Survival of the fittest, baby!

Survival of the fittest? You are taking this WAY too seriously, ma'am.

I hope you find some form of peace and calm in your day. (you seem to be needing that these days.)

Good luck.

Singularity

EmilyD wrote:

Survival of the fittest? You are taking this WAY too seriously, ma'am.

I hope you find some form of peace and calm in your day. (you seem to be needing that these days.)

Good luck.

?

It is you who keeps insisting on continuing to beat this poor, tired old horse of a topic.

I really don't care, anymore.

Why do you?

Still trynta "cock block" (a soft test for proof of life re ADMIN) the conversation over son of witless's time knife argument? Should I assume that's what you are so gravely concerned about?

Okay, sure.

Sorry, witless.

Em may not want us to have that conversation....

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

Singularity wrote:

When a RAPIST first has guilty ruminations, or after implantation?

Recall that medically/technically, a woman or fertile child is "pregnant" at the beginning of the menstrual cycle which ultimately results in implantation of a conceptus that might not have implanted until two to three weeks into the process!

I might kill the bass-turd with my bare hands but my wife would have kept the baby and so would I. This I can attest to.

And you answered it well with scripture. Sin (missing the mark) begins in the heart and God sees the heart.

Singularity

BigMike wrote:

I might kill the bass-turd with my bare hands but my wife would have kept the baby and so would I. This I can attest to.

And you answered it well with scripture. Sin (missing the mark) begins in the heart and God sees the heart.

"Vengeance is MINE," sayeth THE LORD.

SO, theoretically extending your(s) and others less recent but still in distant memory from earlier in this thread's argumentation, ... if you can kill the rapist that threatens your wife with an unwanted progeny, why not kill the "heartless baby" that threatens havoc, legally and emotionally, to your family?

Singularity

Back on topic! Celebration music!

https://youtu.be/eOx9quc-iow

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

Singularity wrote:

It was I who asked the question in the title and published it in a thread under my avatar. And in a Socratic manner, I developed the topic! So having begun the inquisition, I am the master inquisitor on this thread as well as the judge of what I FIND topical and interesting. I may not control or limit the subjects, Subjects or their productions. I may only choose how and when to respond. Or not.

In other words, you threw some hypothetical chum in the water to draw the male sharks in where you could harpoon those mean, nasty ol critters.

The national rape-related pregnancy rate is 5.0% per rape among victims of reproductive age (aged 12 to 45); among adult women an estimated 32,101 pregnancies result from rape each year. Among 34 cases of rape-related pregnancy, the majority occurred among adolescents and resulted from assault by a known, often related perpetrator. Only 11.7% of these victims received immediate medical attention after the assault, and 47.1% received no medical attention related to the rape. A total 32.4% of these victims did not discover they were pregnant until they had already entered the second trimester; 32.2% opted to keep the infant whereas 50% underwent abortion and 5.9% placed the infant for adoption; an additional 11.8% had spontaneous abortion.

Unwanted pregnancies are closely linked with family and domestic violence.