If your wife were to be raped...
EmilyD wrote:
Yes. That is what you do.
Correction, I checked to see if the other account had any messages. It is Mourningstar. Took me a while to find it since I didn't recall the name correctly.
It had been closed as inactive.
Singularity wrote:
https://www.motherjones.com/crime-justice/2019/08/rapist-custody-abortion/
and becomes pregnant...
and because you can't do DNA paternity testing until the 10th week of gestation...
it now has a "beating heart," so
she delivers a child of obviously different racial features from the rest of the family, essentially confirming the identity of the biologic father, the rapist ....
And when they are five years old, the biologic father gets out of prison after pleading to a lesser charge and the courts rule your wife must share custody of the child with the mother's rapist, because he wasn't convicted of rape,
and with you by default, unless you divorce her, pay child support for possibly all the children born during your marriage, and see ALL your children raised by their next new Stepdad, on your dime.
You might consider hanging in there. In some States the Rapebabydaddy might pay minimal child support if he can get a job with a felony conviction...
https://www.motherjones.com/crime-justice/2019/08/... (
show quote)
Mother Jones puts forth a null argument. Less than 1 % of abortions involve rape. Incest even less.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/05/24/rape-and-incest-account-few-abortions-so-why-all-attention/1211175001/What if Mother Jones put forth a relevant argument ?
The incidences of rape and incest are woefully under reported for many reasons. Also under investigated, under represented and under convicted.
Legal claims cannot be substantiated without a legal conviction. Both rape and incest are crimes and with children, "the fox is often guarding the hen house" in those situations, so legal or outside involvement is discouraged.
Singularity wrote:
Correction, I checked to see if the other account had any messages. It is Mourningstar. Took me a while to find it since I didn't recall the name correctly.
It had been closed as inactive.
You're trying too hard. Very revealing....
Singularity wrote:
Christ on a cracker!?!
Suit yourself.
Oh I am! Keep it up! Now it's getting funny!
Cuda2020 wrote:
Yes it is? That reply doesn't make any sense. When you jump into a conversation, write complete sentences so we know what you're referring to.
Cuda said, "And aborting a fetus or embryo is not aborting babies."
Emily replied, "Yes, it is."
Makes perfect sense to me.
When you read a person's reply to something you said, try to remember you actually said something.
Singularity wrote:
https://www.motherjones.com/crime-justice/2019/08/rapist-custody-abortion/
and becomes pregnant...
and because you can't do DNA paternity testing until the 10th week of gestation...
it now has a "beating heart," so
she delivers a child of obviously different racial features from the rest of the family, essentially confirming the identity of the biologic father, the rapist ....
And when they are five years old, the biologic father gets out of prison after pleading to a lesser charge and the courts rule your wife must share custody of the child with the mother's rapist, because he wasn't convicted of rape,
and with you by default, unless you divorce her, pay child support for possibly all the children born during your marriage, and see ALL your children raised by their next new Stepdad, on your dime.
You might consider hanging in there. In some States the Rapebabydaddy might pay minimal child support if he can get a job with a felony conviction...
https://www.motherjones.com/crime-justice/2019/08/... (
show quote)
If I was raped, I would first report it to the police.
Blade_Runner wrote:
Cuda said, "And aborting a fetus or embryo is not aborting babies."
Emily replied, "Yes, it is."
Makes perfect sense to me.
When you read a person's reply to something you said, try to remember you actually said something.
That was not the sole assertion made by Cuda in the post replied to. It is not entirely clear which proposition Emily wanted to refute. It seems this was just another childish attempt at attention seeking or diverting the thread from its topic.
Could it be the points made and information gathered here have been such a threateningly strong argument? Convincing enough to elicit such a mega crazy, all holds barred accusation in response!?!
We never knew exactly what FLOTUS 45 meant by that message on the green jacket, but I'm feeling it...
EmilyD wrote:
Oh I am! Keep it up! Now it's getting funny!
Would you please continue to pump up this ballooning fantasy conspiracy of yours?
It makes me look so diabolically BADASS and
smart!I'm considering publishing parts of it to make a NEW stand alone thread with some catchy click bait kind of title....
Everyone should get in on the fun!
And it would be a very interesting Trojan Horse kind of arrangement to tag along the seemingly powerful argument presented in the rest of the body of my thread and get IT a lot more attention.
Prolly would need to pare it down to size, tighten it up a bit....
Singularity wrote:
Would you please continue to pump up this ballooning fantasy conspiracy of yours?
It makes me look so diabolically BADASS and smart!
I'm considering publishing parts of it to make a NEW stand alone thread with some catchy click bait kind of title....
Everyone should get in on the fun!
And it would be a very interesting Trojan Horse kind of arrangement to tag along the seemingly powerful argument presented in the rest of the body of my thread and get IT a lot more attention.
Prolly would need to pare it down to size, tighten it up a bit....
Would you please continue to pump up this ballooni... (
show quote)
Wow. I sure have triggered you! And you're doing such a good job making my case yourself, I think I'll just sit back and eat my popcorn!
EmilyD wrote:
Wow. I sure have triggered you! And you're doing such a good job making my case yourself, I think I'll just sit back and eat my popcorn!
My research is a tad triggering.
You like to read pain porn while munching popcorn?
Link to thread
https://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/tpr?p=3857337&t=225136
I messaged ADMIN that if they aren't pleased with how I'm handling this, they could step up!
I'm not playing. I'm considering contacting outside law enforcement.
Because I don't wish to subject myself to any further filth I might find by following up any further.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.