One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Slate magazine/Trump probably won Arizona
Page <<first <prev 3 of 6 next> last>>
May 25, 2021 18:41:02   #
debeda
 
moldyoldy wrote:
https://kevinsfavorites.quora.com/The-Election-Fraud-Fraud-Part-II


This person is not a court. NO court of law agreed to review evidence or hear testimony.

Reply
May 25, 2021 18:54:15   #
moldyoldy
 
debeda wrote:
This person is not a court. NO court of law agreed to review evidence or hear testimony.


Because they had nothing real to show the judges.

Reply
May 25, 2021 18:55:56   #
Mikeyavelli
 
Airforceone wrote:
If you believe conspiracy theories. If that was the case all you have to do is head on down to the local court house and submit your evidence to the judge.

The party of Trump has a poor track record you now are 62 court cases lost and have won zero.

So common sense would tell you get this evidence to a judge and get the witnesses on the stand to testify under oath. It’s a simple process.

If what your saying is true the GOP would be running to the courts but common sense is not in the DNA of the party of Trump.
If you believe conspiracy theories. If that was th... (show quote)


It was lack of courage that these judges didn't want to be the judge who brought down the entire lefty movement. There's plenty of evidence, just no courage.
Videos of two women running ballots over and over, all for Biden? That's hard evidence.

Reply
 
 
May 25, 2021 19:40:22   #
debeda
 
moldyoldy wrote:
Because they had nothing real to show the judges.


Uh huh

Reply
May 25, 2021 19:40:40   #
roy
 
okie don wrote:
Too many witnesses in tooany states to ignore it. A 6 voting machines showing a sudden unexplained increase should raise eyebrows.


And when you keep believing the lie your mind will be pudding.So sad you do keep believing this crap.

Reply
May 25, 2021 19:41:49   #
debeda
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
It was lack of courage that these judges didn't want to be the judge who brought down the entire lefty movement. There's plenty of evidence, just no courage.
Videos of two women running ballots over and over, all for Biden? That's hard evidence.


Yep!!! And throwing out Republican observers, then pulling out cases of ballots from under a table. Also on video.....

Reply
May 25, 2021 19:43:35   #
peg w
 
I googled Slate Arizona Elections, and I read an article "what if the unorthodox Arizona audit declares Trump a winner". No wear was there anything about Trump winnning, just that the "audit" may declare Trump the winner. The atricle was totally devoted to how flawed the "audit" actually is. You should read it. Very imformative.

Reply
 
 
May 25, 2021 20:10:44   #
Big Kahuna
 
peg w wrote:
We had a number of recounts, and Biden won Az, Ga, Mi Wi, Pa etc. About NH. I took 2 trips in NH in Sept, traviling 4 hrs each trip. I didn't see one Trump yard sign.Trump lost. Get over it. Remember this about the these "audits" it doesn't matter who votes, just who counts the votes. In the "audits" Forever Trumpers are doing the count.


Hard to see Trump signs when you leftists keep stealing them and start burning and looting the properties with Trump signs.

Reply
May 25, 2021 20:11:44   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
moldyoldy wrote:
Is there concrete evidence of fraud in the 2020 US presidential election?
Profile photo for Kevin Davidson
Kevin Davidson, lives in The United States of America
Updated November 26, 2020 · Author has 23.6K answers and 45.3M answer views
Originally Answered: What is the best evidence of voter fraud in the 2020 US presidential election?
You could make a circumstantial argument that goes something like:

Pollsters almost universally predicted a big win for Biden, but his win was fairly narrow, therefore Republicans must have engaged in fraud, just not enough to win.

Another argument goes:

Studies have shown that historically fraud in US elections ranges from 0.0003% to 0.0025%; therefore, we would expect the same level of fraud in 2020.

Or:

150,000 ballots were found in post offices undelivered the morning after the election; that couldn’t have happened by chance. Since most mail ballots are for Biden, it must be the Republicans.

I know of two credible charges of fraud in 2020, neither of which involved a successful fraudulent vote. There are lots of conspiracy theories and lots of videos from people who allegedly engaged in or saw fraud, but there’s no evidence that these folks are telling the truth, particularly since money has been offered for such stories. The one sworn statement from a postal worker in Pennsylvania was retracted. There are people who look at charts of data and say “that can’t be right,” but they’re not qualified to know what’s anomalous, and they don’t look for simpler alternative explanations (that’s why they are not being scientific). At least some of the alleged dead voters turned up alive, saved by a clerical error. I suspect most of the rest of them will be found based on prior investigations of dead voters. Some claimed they saw workers in the Georgia hand recount put Trump voters in the Biden pile — but couldn’t explain how they just happened to come up with the same totals as the machiners.

If someone is looking for proof that reptoids under the North Pole are twiddling dials on a supercomputer and flipping votes in the United States, I’m afraid they will be disappointed. (And no, I didn’t make that up.)

If there were any evidence of widespread fraud sufficient to make the slightest difference in the 2020 election, the Trump Campaign would be presenting it in court, rather than admitting they don’t have any, withdrawing lawsuits, and not proving anything. Seriously, what is some individual on the Internet going to find that Trump’s lawyers don’t know about?

I wish I had a more substantive answer, but the Internet rumors of fraud are themselves not substantive. I’ve put together a collection of fraud stories in my Quora space.

The Election Fraud Fraud
Is there concrete evidence of fraud in the 2020 US... (show quote)


Thank You, moldy... You are right, most on the net is no better than all the other media liars, suppressors with no higher accountability..

You are projecting there’s no evidence that these folks are telling the truth, I agree but for a different bases, because not a one of those filed claims before the courts were “judicially determined” with dismissals on the many claiming “no legal standing”, not because what was contained in the briefs nor actually litigated so whatever the facts submitted were never reviewed..

The no legal standing is a common cop out for many a case causing refilling where warranted..Given the time restraints involve they could not get the legal review necessary along with discourse in what to do about the election itself..

Reply
May 25, 2021 21:11:34   #
moldyoldy
 
debeda wrote:
Yep!!! And throwing out Republican observers, then pulling out cases of ballots from under a table. Also on video.....


Also, proven to be an altered video.

Reply
May 25, 2021 22:34:23   #
Mikeyavelli
 
moldyoldy wrote:
Also, proven to be an altered video.


Like a FISA warrant to spy on Trump?

Reply
 
 
May 25, 2021 23:21:24   #
debeda
 
moldyoldy wrote:
Also, proven to be an altered video.


That is not true.

Reply
May 25, 2021 23:22:02   #
debeda
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
Like a FISA warrant to spy on Trump?


Lolololhahahaha 🌞🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣JUST like that

Reply
May 25, 2021 23:33:54   #
moldyoldy
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
Like a FISA warrant to spy on Trump?


FISA warrants were issued for all of trumps cabinet being vetted by Russian spies.

Reply
May 25, 2021 23:36:29   #
debeda
 
moldyoldy wrote:
FISA warrants were issued for all of trumps cabinet being vetted by Russian spies.


Uh huh. There is an FBI attorney in jail for those "real" FISA warrants.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.