RandyBrian Loc: Texas

OK. You are still promoting a version of Gaia, regardless of what you do or do not call it. And it sounds like you are basing decisions based on that belief. That's fine. A lot of people do not believe in God as depicted in the Bible, which I most certainly do. To each their own.

Cuda2020

I've debated with you before, we, like I said, we come from two different perspectives on debating.

Cuda2020

Exactly, to each his own, the difference, possibly, is that I am open to new information, are you? Or is yours cast in stone? You being partially a person of science I'm perceiving you as a little more open, is that correct? I wouldn't call me promoting anything, only versing my thoughts.

son of witless

No we don't. We have the exact same perspective on winning the debate. I am more honest than you. I play by rules, which you do not. You want to win as much as I do. When you said " No, that's not how a debate works, but as I thought you define a debate differently then I do, for you it is a win or lose, and you never want to lose and in your mind you never do, I'm more about an exchange of thoughts, I really don't care if you agree with me or not, " and then I believe I said what a load of horse manure or words to that effect.

You are not here to learn from me. You are here to beat my ideas. I accept that fact. Again, I am more honest than you.

RandyBrian Loc: Texas

I have always been a man of science, of evidence. Science has a long LONG history of making assumptions with too little evidence, so yes, I try my best to be open to new thoughts, new ideas, and new perspectives. But I also expect credible supporting evidence.

Cuda2020

I'm not here to beat your ideas, ounce again that is your perspective, just a you thinking you are more honest and you repeating yourself it doesn't make it any more true...

Cuda2020

On that we are in agreement.

son of witless

You are not here to beat my ideas ? Then for what purpose do you engage with me and the others here ? To me this is exactly a battle of ideas. Just like when the Founders debated the US Constitution. The Federalists verses the Anti Federalists. The Federalists won the war, but the Anti Federalists made some solid points that we are all still benefiting from.

Why says whether you are right or I am right ? I say you defend your ideas and I will defend mine. This is a battle of ideas. The best ones will survive the crucible. I keep trying to lay some ground rules on you lefties, so we get a fair war. So far you guys are not interested.

son of witless

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

These discussions are for a battle of which direction this Republic shall go.
Right or Left.
Conservative or Liberal.
Socialism or Free enterprise.
The individual or the collective.
The principles of the Constitution have stood for over 200 years.
The results are for all to see.
Some desire to ignore the results, and will try to erase the results.
Communists are always for erasing the past. They need to.

It seems liberals do not have a very good grasp of what Communism delivers. The masses fell for the Bolshevik BS. The Chinese never knew what hit them. The ruthlessness is beyond most peoples comprehension, largely due to lack if studying it. It sure isn't taught in the government school system. Over 200 Million people starved and slaughtered by those regimes.
***When reading 'behind communism'; It is important to differentiate the different categories covered under the term "Jew". The term "Jew" is misused a lot, fraudulently, and confusingly.

(this is not anti-Semitic; so don't fall for the anti-Semite Smear. Ashkenazim atheists that identify themselves as Jews, are NOT Hebrew or Semitic)
Behind Communism
Behind Communism : Frank L Britton : Free Download & Streaming ...
http://archive.org/details/BehindCommunism
by Frank L Britton. Probably published in 1952.
(free down load from the internet)

son of witless

They are the animals from Animal Farm and their leaders are pigs.

promilitary

If I got the Nobel for ANYTHING, I would take it as an insult and turn it down.

P Lightfoot Loc: DEPLOYED ON STATION

Nominated by Black Lives Matter or George Soros

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Will 2024 be Orwell's 1984?

These discussions are for a battle of which direction this Republic shall go.
Right or Left.
Conservative or Liberal.
Socialism or Free enterprise.
The individual or the collective.
The principles of the Constitution have stood for over 200 years.
The results are for all to see.
Some desire to ignore the results, and will try to erase the results.
Communists are always for erasing the past. They need to.

It seems liberals do not have a very good grasp of what Communism delivers. The masses fell for the Bolshevik BS. The Chinese never knew what hit them. The ruthlessness is beyond most peoples comprehension, largely due to lack if studying it. It sure isn't taught in the government school system. Over 200 Million people starved and slaughtered by those regimes.
***When reading 'behind communism'; It is important to differentiate the different categories covered under the term "Jew". The term "Jew" is misused a lot, fraudulently, and confusingly.

(this is not anti-Semitic; so don't fall for the anti-Semite Smear. Ashkenazim atheists that identify themselves as Jews, are NOT Hebrew or Semitic)
Behind Communism
Behind Communism : Frank L Britton : Free Download & Streaming ...
http://archive.org/details/BehindCommunism
by Frank L Britton. Probably published in 1952.