One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Massive Amount of Evidence Will be Presented on Jan. 6th
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
Jan 2, 2021 09:40:26   #
Radiance3
 
rk wrote:
Can Pence be trusted?
move in to the 12th amendment
but, but if Jan 20 passes and no swear in?
....On to March ?
no problem Trump has the Trump cards an the “Wild” card.
Remember Trump is our president
With a second term to finish the clean up
of corruption.

=================
Everything has been done by the communist

Reply
Jan 2, 2021 10:42:51   #
bahmer
 
Radiance3 wrote:
Massive Amounts of Evidence Will Be Presented’ on Jan. 6: Trump

BY JACK PHILLIPS January 1, 2021 Updated: January 1, 2021 biggersmaller Print

President Donald Trump announced that evidence of alleged election fraud will be presented on Jan. 6 during the Joint Session of Congress.

“Massive amounts of evidence will be presented on the 6th. We won, BIG!” Trump wrote on Twitter.

It comes as Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and about 40 House GOP lawmakers have announced they would challenge the Electoral College votes during the Jan. 6 Joint Session of Congress due to alleged fraud and irregularities during the Nov. 3 election. The challenge could lead to several hours of debate during the session.

The challenge is supported by Trump, who, in recent weeks, has met with House lawmakers, including its chief sponsor Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.), at the White House.

Trump’s adviser, Jason Miller, told Newsmax earlier in the week that the team is aiming to present more evidence.

“We will have a chance in front of the American people, next week to present these cases, all these evidences of fraud,” Miller said, pointing to a lawsuit filed by Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) against Vice President Mike Pence earlier this week to prevent him from confirming Joe Biden’s electoral victory. Pence’s lawyers with the Department of Justice later said Pence isn’t the person who should face a lawsuit, arguing that Gohmert should have sued Congress.

If Hawley and the other lawmakers challenge a state’s Electoral College votes, Trump’s campaign will make their presentation. The challenge requires a senator and a representative to carry out.

Miller pointed to law changes regarding mail-in ballots in Wisconsin and other states, “suitcases of ballots” in Georgia being wheeled out late at night on Nov. 3 in Atlanta’s State Farm Center, and officials in Michigan and Arizona allegedly blocking them from inspecting voting systems. State election officials in those states have denied claims from the Trump team and third-parties about voter fraud and irregularities.

“These are the specific types of evidence we want to present to the American people on the national stage and not allow local politicians to sweep it under the rug,” Miller said on the program.

Miller and Trump did not elaborate on how they would present that information to Congress, or whether they will be able to do so.

The president, in making his announcement for Jan. 6, retweeted Hawley’s post where he said that millions of Americans are “concerned about election integrity” and “deserve to be heard.”

“Somebody has to stand up. 74 million Americans are not going to be told their voices don’t matter,” Hawley also stated.

Trump has also suggested that his supporters attend rallies and events on Jan. 6, including one in Washington D.C. at 11 a.m.

==================
Shameless SC who would not look into these. A gross violations of the peoples' constitutional rights. A gross violations of protecting the integrity of the election. A gross violations of the duties they are required to serve. A gross denial of the rights of the constitutional rights of the American people.

I hope VP Pence who is in charged on Jan 6th will act according to the laws of the constitution vested on him. The frauds were overwhelming, and there is no doubt it went beyond the claimed number of Biden's stolen victory.

Anybody in Congress who continue denying these violations has no duty to continue its duty to be in Congress. This is the most important part of our history cause this resolution if not followed accordingly, will result to the demise of our constitutional-republic.
Massive Amounts of Evidence Will Be Presented’ on ... (show quote)


Amen and Amen

Reply
Jan 2, 2021 11:02:05   #
Alber
 
Radiance3 wrote:
Massive Amounts of Evidence Will Be Presented’ on Jan. 6: Trump

BY JACK PHILLIPS January 1, 2021 Updated: January 1, 2021 biggersmaller Print

President Donald Trump announced that evidence of alleged election fraud will be presented on Jan. 6 during the Joint Session of Congress.

“Massive amounts of evidence will be presented on the 6th. We won, BIG!” Trump wrote on Twitter.

It comes as Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and about 40 House GOP lawmakers have announced they would challenge the Electoral College votes during the Jan. 6 Joint Session of Congress due to alleged fraud and irregularities during the Nov. 3 election. The challenge could lead to several hours of debate during the session.

The challenge is supported by Trump, who, in recent weeks, has met with House lawmakers, including its chief sponsor Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.), at the White House.

Trump’s adviser, Jason Miller, told Newsmax earlier in the week that the team is aiming to present more evidence.

“We will have a chance in front of the American people, next week to present these cases, all these evidences of fraud,” Miller said, pointing to a lawsuit filed by Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) against Vice President Mike Pence earlier this week to prevent him from confirming Joe Biden’s electoral victory. Pence’s lawyers with the Department of Justice later said Pence isn’t the person who should face a lawsuit, arguing that Gohmert should have sued Congress.

If Hawley and the other lawmakers challenge a state’s Electoral College votes, Trump’s campaign will make their presentation. The challenge requires a senator and a representative to carry out.

Miller pointed to law changes regarding mail-in ballots in Wisconsin and other states, “suitcases of ballots” in Georgia being wheeled out late at night on Nov. 3 in Atlanta’s State Farm Center, and officials in Michigan and Arizona allegedly blocking them from inspecting voting systems. State election officials in those states have denied claims from the Trump team and third-parties about voter fraud and irregularities.

“These are the specific types of evidence we want to present to the American people on the national stage and not allow local politicians to sweep it under the rug,” Miller said on the program.

Miller and Trump did not elaborate on how they would present that information to Congress, or whether they will be able to do so.

The president, in making his announcement for Jan. 6, retweeted Hawley’s post where he said that millions of Americans are “concerned about election integrity” and “deserve to be heard.”

“Somebody has to stand up. 74 million Americans are not going to be told their voices don’t matter,” Hawley also stated.

Trump has also suggested that his supporters attend rallies and events on Jan. 6, including one in Washington D.C. at 11 a.m.

==================
Shameless SC who would not look into these. A gross violations of the peoples' constitutional rights. A gross violations of protecting the integrity of the election. A gross violations of the duties they are required to serve. A gross denial of the rights of the constitutional rights of the American people.

I hope VP Pence who is in charged on Jan 6th will act according to the laws of the constitution vested on him. The frauds were overwhelming, and there is no doubt it went beyond the claimed number of Biden's stolen victory.

Anybody in Congress who continue denying these violations has no duty to continue its duty to be in Congress. This is the most important part of our history cause this resolution if not followed accordingly, will result to the demise of our constitutional-republic.
Massive Amounts of Evidence Will Be Presented’ on ... (show quote)




I think that these elections are not about Democrats and Republicans, rather it is about who defends the country and who wants to deliver it. I believe that there are Democrats who do not agree with what is happening and that there are Republicans who do. As much as they have tried to cover it up, it is a scandal of great proportions that the elections have been fraudulent. Everyone knows it, Democrats, Republicans, the media, the judges; and most importantly: the majority of Americans; of course, there are those who have been misled by the propaganda that has satanized a man because he has said what the majority wanted to hear and was elected, even though his opponents cheated.
The media, politicians and judges have been intimidated, others have been bought and many are afraid that their involvement in dark affairs will be discovered. Very few are blameless.
Next day 6, no matter what is said. Words, reason and justice do not exist in a deeply corrupted environment. The evidence of fraud can be enormous, but those who committed it and those who support them (for one reason or another) do not want to recognize it; and neither will they do it in Congress.
There are two paths here: the force of justice or the justice of force.
Whoever has force on his side will be the winner, to the detriment or benefit of the country and all its inhabitants.
Will the patriots surrender this country without a fight? Will the armed forces be satisfied that the country submits to the interests of its enemies? We will soon know.

Reply
 
 
Jan 2, 2021 11:31:38   #
Carol Kelly
 
Weasel wrote:
EXCELLENT


Fingers crossed and hands folded.

Reply
Jan 2, 2021 12:50:59   #
Dinty
 
LogicallyRight wrote:
Jack, we're mostly in agreement. but here I disagree.
***How left is McConnell ? Stopping the $2,000 stimulus checks will cost the conservatives votes by independents and maybe control of the senate. Why isn't he supporting Trump with voter fraud stolen election? Is he that far left, deep State?
>>>President Trump might have been right in proposing the $2000, and that the $600 was not enough. But consider this. Most Americans were not put out of work and have been working all along. Many started working from home and saved on commuting costs and time. Why should they get $2000 from our grand children. It isn't free money. It all comes with costs in more debt. I'm retired and still get my pension and social security check. I'm saving money every month, and the Government sent me a $1200 check. Now we are sopposed to get another $2000.
Now, if this $2000 was aimed at those that were unjustly put out of work by these Governors, then I might be for it. McConnell might also be for it. But a $2000 check to everyone under a certain amount of income is ridiculous and nothing but pandering. It is so when the Democrats suggest stupid things like that and it is just as stupid when a Republican proposes it. And it should be well publicized why he would do that. Illegals, hell no. Prisoners, hell no. Government workers, hell no. Any elected politician or appointed or elected judge, hell no. Any teacher who refused to open up schools for our children and grand children who weren't at risk, hell no. Need I go on. The waiters and bar tenders and cooks, etc, hell yes. They've suffered the most. And limiting it to them wouldn't be that costly.
Now as far as McConnell not helping President Trump in this election fraud, he damn well could do more and should. Lets see what he does on Jan 6 when he leads the Senate in debate over the election fraud in seven states and the contested Electoral Delegates.

Cheers
Logically Right
Jack, we're mostly in agreement. but here I disagr... (show quote)


I am in total agreement. I am retired (in my 90's), get small pension ans SS. I live check to check but I get by. I have money coming in every month, not like people laid off because of all the restrictions against them. Most want to go back to work but are refrained from doing so. Like I said, I do not need the $600. or $1200., the ones not working do.

Reply
Jan 2, 2021 13:07:23   #
woodguru
 
Radiance3 wrote:
==================
You can rant your case all day. You have no proof of your words coming out from your mouth.
We have laws to follow, rightfully embedded in our constitution. Massive evidences of fraud are overwhelming that could not be denied. All evidences are fully provided.

Do you realize (apparently not) that your disconnect is from the fact that there has been no evidence that there was election fraud...only anecdotal examples of how fraud could happen. Okay, so you see how fraud could possibly happen, you then have to go to the next step which is to prove it. We are not in the business of flipping an election because you see how massive fraud could have happened, it has not been proved.

Meanwhile the kind that happened in Kentucky will be easy to prove because the numbers won't lie.

Reply
Jan 2, 2021 13:10:54   #
woodguru
 
Radiance3 wrote:
=================
Everything has been done by the communist


And here lies the reality we are dealing with, people who use irrelevant words in a rhetorical manner, communist, socialist, nazi, dictator...do you know Obama was called a nazi and dictator by the same people on the right? He didn't do any of the things trump did that are the slides into an autocracy.

Reply
 
 
Jan 2, 2021 14:48:23   #
Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois
 
woodguru wrote:
Do you realize (apparently not) that your disconnect is from the fact that there has been no evidence that there was election fraud...only anecdotal examples of how fraud could happen. Okay, so you see how fraud could possibly happen, you then have to go to the next step which is to prove it. We are not in the business of flipping an election because you see how massive fraud could have happened, it has not been proved.

Meanwhile the kind that happened in Kentucky will be easy to prove because the numbers won't lie.
Do you realize (apparently not) that your disconne... (show quote)

All your ilk claim there's no evidence of election fraud. You have to be either blind as hell or lying through your teeth. I claim BOTH!

Reply
Jan 2, 2021 15:17:22   #
LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago
 
jack sequim wa wrote:
We are in agreement.
The checks not aimed at only those that lost income due to Covid...right?
Here is what is not being said...
The checks are stimulus checks, which initially where designated to stimulate the economy first and secondly help those whom have lost income due to the virus.
I will say that the rising stock market and economic fitness of the American economy are in no way related but the stock market does respond to futures in the economy. I would further suggest that our economic collapse is knocking at the door considering the deep impact of inflation heading our way due to the trillions of printed dollars by the feds and collapsing economies around the globe.
Trump tells the American people through positives and will not strike fears into the public, telling them how desperate our economy is in need of bottom up stimulus .
Watch what begins to reveal itself in the next 60 days in the vacuum of no substantial stimulus checks.
Our micro and macro economic health is presently in the beginning stages of complete collapse and considering the greatest stock market bubbles in America's history, if we begin popping these over valued bubbles the dominoes will begin falling.

Jack
We are in agreement. br The checks not aimed at... (show quote)


I understand the point of stimulus, but how many who were working all along just bank the money or pay down the mortgage. And as you stated, we will eventually get massive inflation due to the printing of excessive dollars. You can't just create wealth by printing it. It steals from the future and we will all eventually have to pay the piper. That would be another reason in my opinion to limit the $2000 to those that were actually hurt by lost employment. Make them well from the crime of having their jobs ruined by Government overreach by Governors.

We're good and I look forward to a lot of your posts.

Logically Right

Reply
Jan 2, 2021 15:25:08   #
LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago
 
Dinty wrote:
I am in total agreement. I am retired (in my 90's), get small pension ans SS. I live check to check but I get by. I have money coming in every month, not like people laid off because of all the restrictions against them. Most want to go back to work but are refrained from doing so. Like I said, I do not need the $600. or $1200., the ones not working do.


I worry about the inflation that this Government spending will eventually cause. If I end up getting $2000, I'll keep it as a future hedge against the eventual inflation that will follow. I am retired and Social Security will supposedly rise with inflation, if we can trust the government, but my pension won't. So that money becomes worth less and less and that is why I would keep the $2000.

Logically Right

Reply
Jan 2, 2021 15:46:01   #
woodguru
 
LogicallyRight wrote:
I understand the point of stimulus, but how many who were working all along just bank the money or pay down the mortgage. And as you stated, we will eventually get massive inflation due to the printing of excessive dollars. You can't just create wealth by printing it. It steals from the future and we will all eventually have to pay the piper. That would be another reason in my opinion to limit the $2000 to those that were actually hurt by lost employment. Make them well from the crime of having their jobs ruined by Government overreach by Governors.

We're good and I look forward to a lot of your posts.

Logically Right
I understand the point of stimulus, but how many w... (show quote)


This is one thing I agree with, stimulus for people who need it, my wife has two birds only veterinary clinics, she has been busier than ever, partially because they had to increase the time allocated for each appointment to provide time to clean all surfaces clients touched and whatnot. She does not need help, but the way we are looking at it is that if one of her employees gets it or is exposed from family who has it she will shut her business down until enough time has passed to see who has it and who doesn't. Her employees will need assistance because she isn't getting anything from the government to keep people working or compensate them iof they aren't. What bothers me ios the people that gamed business loans that don't have to be paid back as long as they hire their people back or whatever it is, yet they got the money and their people are not being compensated. Also businesses that are essential that are not effected but business owners get loans they did not need.

The models used in other countries have worked to different degrees, the intelligent government that has the best resources such as ours should have studied what works and profiled and used different things where they are appropriate for an array of different regions and circumstances.

This country has been and is a mess due to misinformation and political bias and ignorance.

Reply
 
 
Jan 2, 2021 15:48:31   #
woodguru
 
LogicallyRight wrote:
I worry about the inflation that this Government spending will eventually cause. If I end up getting $2000, I'll keep it as a future hedge against the eventual inflation that will follow. I am retired and Social Security will supposedly rise with inflation, if we can trust the government, but my pension won't. So that money becomes worth less and less and that is why I would keep the $2000.

Logically Right


Were you worried about the completely useless tax cuts and the trillions in increased debt they cause? That was increased debt that did not have to happen at all...it was not the right time for tax cuts.

Reply
Jan 2, 2021 17:33:59   #
Auntie Dee
 
Radiance3 wrote:
Massive Amounts of Evidence Will Be Presented’ on Jan. 6: Trump

BY JACK PHILLIPS January 1, 2021 Updated: January 1, 2021 biggersmaller Print

President Donald Trump announced that evidence of alleged election fraud will be presented on Jan. 6 during the Joint Session of Congress.

“Massive amounts of evidence will be presented on the 6th. We won, BIG!” Trump wrote on Twitter.

It comes as Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and about 40 House GOP lawmakers have announced they would challenge the Electoral College votes during the Jan. 6 Joint Session of Congress due to alleged fraud and irregularities during the Nov. 3 election. The challenge could lead to several hours of debate during the session.

The challenge is supported by Trump, who, in recent weeks, has met with House lawmakers, including its chief sponsor Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.), at the White House.

Trump’s adviser, Jason Miller, told Newsmax earlier in the week that the team is aiming to present more evidence.

“We will have a chance in front of the American people, next week to present these cases, all these evidences of fraud,” Miller said, pointing to a lawsuit filed by Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) against Vice President Mike Pence earlier this week to prevent him from confirming Joe Biden’s electoral victory. Pence’s lawyers with the Department of Justice later said Pence isn’t the person who should face a lawsuit, arguing that Gohmert should have sued Congress.

If Hawley and the other lawmakers challenge a state’s Electoral College votes, Trump’s campaign will make their presentation. The challenge requires a senator and a representative to carry out.

Miller pointed to law changes regarding mail-in ballots in Wisconsin and other states, “suitcases of ballots” in Georgia being wheeled out late at night on Nov. 3 in Atlanta’s State Farm Center, and officials in Michigan and Arizona allegedly blocking them from inspecting voting systems. State election officials in those states have denied claims from the Trump team and third-parties about voter fraud and irregularities.

“These are the specific types of evidence we want to present to the American people on the national stage and not allow local politicians to sweep it under the rug,” Miller said on the program.

Miller and Trump did not elaborate on how they would present that information to Congress, or whether they will be able to do so.

The president, in making his announcement for Jan. 6, retweeted Hawley’s post where he said that millions of Americans are “concerned about election integrity” and “deserve to be heard.”

“Somebody has to stand up. 74 million Americans are not going to be told their voices don’t matter,” Hawley also stated.

Trump has also suggested that his supporters attend rallies and events on Jan. 6, including one in Washington D.C. at 11 a.m.

==================
Shameless SC who would not look into these. A gross violations of the peoples' constitutional rights. A gross violations of protecting the integrity of the election. A gross violations of the duties they are required to serve. A gross denial of the rights of the constitutional rights of the American people.

I hope VP Pence who is in charged on Jan 6th will act according to the laws of the constitution vested on him. The frauds were overwhelming, and there is no doubt it went beyond the claimed number of Biden's stolen victory.

Anybody in Congress who continue denying these violations has no duty to continue its duty to be in Congress. This is the most important part of our history cause this resolution if not followed accordingly, will result to the demise of our constitutional-republic.
Massive Amounts of Evidence Will Be Presented’ on ... (show quote)


I doubt if any of the MSM stations will show this Congressional Session until the voting begins! They have managed to keep the truth from their most loyal followers, no need to stop now!!

Perhaps the most important thing is to show to Congress the STRENGTH of the Trump Supporters and the TRUTH of the FRAUD! We can only hope and pray for the best outcome!!

Reply
Jan 2, 2021 18:22:31   #
LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago
 
woodguru wrote:
This is one thing I agree with, stimulus for people who need it, my wife has two birds only veterinary clinics, she has been busier than ever, partially because they had to increase the time allocated for each appointment to provide time to clean all surfaces clients touched and whatnot. She does not need help, but the way we are looking at it is that if one of her employees gets it or is exposed from family who has it she will shut her business down until enough time has passed to see who has it and who doesn't. Her employees will need assistance because she isn't getting anything from the government to keep people working or compensate them iof they aren't. What bothers me ios the people that gamed business loans that don't have to be paid back as long as they hire their people back or whatever it is, yet they got the money and their people are not being compensated. Also businesses that are essential that are not effected but business owners get loans they did not need.

The models used in other countries have worked to different degrees, the intelligent government that has the best resources such as ours should have studied what works and profiled and used different things where they are appropriate for an array of different regions and circumstances.

This country has been and is a mess due to misinformation and political bias and ignorance.
This is one thing I agree with, stimulus for peopl... (show quote)


Congratulations. we agree on something.

Logically Right

Reply
Jan 2, 2021 18:22:47   #
Mikeyavelli
 
roy wrote:
Trump hollered election fraud for what 4 years. Now if this was a different republican that would have got elected in 2016,we wouldn't be having this comversation. But now we have trump that has convinced his followers there was voter fraud ,but no proof after all the recounts when his people have been there ,and he still has you convinced there was voter fraud,his high paid lawyers which we the tax payers are paying for in one way or the other can't find one dam thing other than propaganda and you still believe this crap ,I feel sorry for you. After jan. 6th,how are you going to feel when Trump starts calling you his followers fools ,idiots ,because he will but as of now trump has pocketed close to a billion dollars ,from the gop funds they and his family took,plus now he has taken millions from his followers to fight the fruad charges to the tune of over 400 million ,and spent about 4 million fighting the fruad charges. So between the close to 700 million they money launder through the gop election funds ,and and close to 400 million to fight election fruad ,I guess you people have made trump a billionaire. Don't you just love it when a man screws your brains out. But good luck Joe ,because trump is screwing your brains out to like no other president has done in history. But like trumps kin that wrote the books and republicans said it was sorry grapes,well everything they wrote is coming true. Trump would rather destory this country than admit defeat,and the bad thing about that his followers feel the same way .Fools you have been used.
Trump hollered election fraud for what 4 years. No... (show quote)


The level of your posts haven't changed this year.
We should all chip in for a grammar lesson for you.
Does your drool short the keyboard?
Get a Joe Biden Keyboard Drool Cover. Old Joe says it works, and Hunter Biden likes it because he can snort cocaine off it too!

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.