One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Where is the evidence of voter fraud.
Page <<first <prev 10 of 13 next> last>>
Dec 20, 2020 02:48:40   #
SSDD
 
dtucker300 wrote:
I absolutely agree with your conclusion even though it is based on a false premise.


Not at all, Trump and his lackeys are quite well known for filing frivolous lawsuits and have been filing quite a few since election day in an attempt to circumvent the will of the people and our constitutionally guaranteed free and fair elections. The election was held, the people spoke via their vote, he lost, now he is throwing a giant tantrum and wasting our time and money on his frivolous lawsuits, and you support his giant hissy fit. I am certain that had he decided to cancel this year's elections and declare himself king, you would have supported that as well.

Reply
Dec 20, 2020 03:06:31   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
SSDD wrote:
Not at all, Trump and his lackeys are quite well known for filing frivolous lawsuits and have been filing quite a few since election day in an attempt to circumvent the will of the people and our constitutionally guaranteed free and fair elections. The election was held, the people spoke via their vote, he lost, now he is throwing a giant tantrum and wasting our time and money on his frivolous lawsuits, and you support his giant hissy fit. I am certain that had he decided to cancel this year's elections and declare himself king, you would have supported that as well.
Not at all, Trump and his lackeys are quite well k... (show quote)


Would you be interested in buying some beachfront property for sale on the San Andreas Fault?

Reply
Dec 20, 2020 13:03:02   #
Pat Riot
 
SSDD wrote:
Yes, I know, unless they side 100% with Trump and his Trumplicans regardless of the fact that they had no case whatsoever, they picked the wrong side as far as you are concerned. Justices "picking sides" is entirely unjustified and the only way they could hear and rule in favor of any case that so severely lacked any evidence or credence would indeed be "picking a side" as the case wouldn't have been decided favorably solely on it's merit.

Why should you feel justified in expecting the justices to go against the constitution and their own responsibilities as the arbiters of justice to hear a case and rule in it's favor when it is unfounded? I thought the Republican party was supposed to favor the constitution and be against changing it or ignoring it altogether, why are you people so dead set to ignore it now? Could it be that you people never cared much for it all along? It appears as though the only time you people ever seem to care much for it is if you think the "other side" is going against it, when it is your people trying to go against it, you never seem to hear many objections from any on your side.
Yes, I know, unless they side 100% with Trump and ... (show quote)


Your post is filled with claptrap. SCOTUS did not follow the Constitution, they simply & pathetically caved into fear:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZM0nopDZuM

Reply
Dec 20, 2020 15:11:26   #
SSDD
 
dtucker300 wrote:
Would you be interested in buying some beachfront property for sale on the San Andreas Fault?


Pat Riot wrote:
Your post is filled with claptrap. SCOTUS did not follow the Constitution, they simply & pathetically caved into fear:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZM0nopDZuM


This is the kind of stupidity that these Trumplicans post and then they B**** whine and cry when we consider them to be of low intellect. If you want others to think you are intelligent, don't post stupidity.

The former, dtucker300, was responding to:

I wrote:
Not at all, Trump and his lackeys are quite well known for filing frivolous lawsuits and have been filing quite a few since election day in an attempt to circumvent the will of the people and our constitutionally guaranteed free and fair elections. The election was held, the people spoke via their vote, he lost, now he is throwing a giant tantrum and wasting our time and money on his frivolous lawsuits, and you support his giant hissy fit. I am certain that had he decided to cancel this year's elections and declare himself king, you would have supported that as well.
Not at all, Trump and his lackeys are quite well k... (show quote)


There is evidence EVERYWHERE of all the frivolous lawsuits Trump has filed throughout his life, most in retaliation for a legitimate suit brought against him or as a way to intimidate someone that has brought a legitimate suit against him for in most cases, payment for services rendered where Trump has refused to pay. To not know these things this late in the game with it being so well covered... That is just plain ignorance and refusal to acknowledge the truth.

Since dtucker is too lazy or intellectually incapable of finding the truth, I suppose I will lay some out here for him. Interestingly enough, Trump's buffoonery is being used as a teaching aid for those looking to take their LSATs (Law School Admission Test), how is that for being famous, even if it is in a bad way.v The first link will be an example of Trump's buffoonery being used as a teaching aid.

https://crushthelsatexam.com/deep-dive-donald-trumps-long-history-of-lawsuits/

And of course the veterans LOVE Trump, as they should since he supposedly has been so great to them.

https://www.veteranstoday.com/2020/11/23/congressman-files-for-disbarment-for-giuliani-and-22-trump-lawyers/

Why are those veterans running such a defamatory article that makes Trump and his lackey's look like such incompetent and dishonest losers in their media outlet?

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/house-democrat-seeks-disbarment-giuliani-22-trump-election-lawyers/

What? A RW media poutlet jumping on the anti-Trump bandwagon? How dare they?

https://checkyourfact.com/2018/01/16/fact-check-has-trump-been-in-thousands-of-lawsuits/

Ah, but as we ALL should know, according to RW nut jobs, EVERY factchecker is LW biased... What a bunch of delusional, low intellect, group of sore losers those incompetent clown enablers are. All the sites they call "fake news" tend to be the ones telling the truth, the sites they promote as the "truth tellers", those tend to be the ones pushing CTs, propaganda and lies. No wonder these Trumplicans are so confused and backwards.

https://washingtonsources.org/politics/analysis-can-trumps-lawyers-get-in-trouble-for-frivolous-lawsuits/100956/


And now we come to the latter, the very unpatriotic, pat riot, and his comment in reply to:

I wrote:

Yes, I know, unless they side 100% with Trump and his Trumplicans regardless of the fact that they had no case whatsoever, they picked the wrong side as far as you are concerned. Justices "picking sides" is entirely unjustified and the only way they could hear and rule in favor of any case that so severely lacked any evidence or credence would indeed be "picking a side" as the case wouldn't have been decided favorably solely on it's merit.

Why should you feel justified in expecting the justices to go against the constitution and their own responsibilities as the arbiters of justice to hear a case and rule in it's favor when it is unfounded? I thought the Republican party was supposed to favor the constitution and be against changing it or ignoring it altogether, why are you people so dead set to ignore it now? Could it be that you people never cared much for it all along? It appears as though the only time you people ever seem to care much for it is if you think the "other side" is going against it, when it is your people trying to go against it, you never seem to hear many objections from any on your side.
br Yes, I know, unless they side 100% with Trump ... (show quote)


SCOTUS, as with any and all judges/justices at various levels throughout the judicial system, they are held to fairly high standards and they should at all times do their level best to meet those standards and I would assume the majority do a fair job of living up to that very obligation. The reason that pat riot thinks otherwise is that he NEEDS to think that way in order to justify his continued support of Trump even with the mountains of mounting evidence of Trump's buffoonery, incompetence, refusal to adhere to the constitution of the United States and his refusal to honor his oath of office. Of course the RW fringe media that makes up for most, if not all, of pat riot's intake of current affairs have been spinning the facts and just plain outright lying to their audience in support of Trump, as I am sure is evidenced in the video pat riot posted in his reply to me that I will not be watching, I have little tolerance for RW nut job commentary so I don't watch any of it. To be fair, I also tend to not be too into watching LW opinion commentators either.


As trying to prove that the justices HAVE been doing their jobs the way in which they are meant to be done is essentially the same thing as trying to prove a negative, that there was no impropriety, I will not bother posting links to prove/disprove anything of this one.


Edit: Of course pat riot is free to attempt to prove a positive, that the justices acted inappropriately, if they can.

Reply
Dec 20, 2020 15:48:24   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
SSDD wrote:
SCOTUS, as with any and all judges/justices at various levels throughout the judicial system, they are held to fairly high standards and they should at all times do their level best to meet those standards and I would assume the majority do a fair job of living up to that very obligation. The reason that pat riot thinks otherwise is that he NEEDS to think that way in order to justify his continued support of Trump even with the mountains of mounting evidence of Trump's buffoonery, incompetence, refusal to adhere to the constitution of the United States and his refusal to honor his oath of office. Of course the RW fringe media that makes up for most, if not all, of pat riot's intake of current affairs have been spinning the facts and just plain outright lying to their audience in support of Trump, as I am sure is evidenced in the video pat riot posted in his reply to me that I will not be watching, I have little tolerance for RW nut job commentary so I don't watch any of it. To be fair, I also tend to not be too into watching LW opinion commentators either.


As trying to prove that the justices HAVE been doing their jobs the way in which they are meant to be done is essentially the same thing as trying to prove a negative, that there was no impropriety, I will not bother posting links to prove/disprove anything of this one.


Edit: Of course pat riot is free to attempt to prove a positive, that the justices acted inappropriately, if they can.
SCOTUS, as with any and all judges/justices at var... (show quote)


What Trump did as a private citizen has no bearing on what he did as President. Most of the lawsuits you attribute to Trump regarding the election were filed by other parties. You will claim they were all part of the Trump team of course. What about the hundreds of lawyers the Democrats sent around the country filing over 300 cases to change voting rules and election laws. The Pennsylvania SC clearly broke Pennsylvania law when they ruled to allow unsolicited mail-in ballots with three extra days to receive them, changing the rules of the game without allowing the electorate to vote on these changes as required by law.

Your problem is that you have such disdain for Trump, the Republican Party, and Conservatives that you lump them all together as right-wingers. Most of your discursive diatribes are disparaging, rude, and contemptuous of anyone with a different opinion than yours so that you invite disrespect from others. That's why they and you can't have civil discourse.

Reply
Dec 20, 2020 16:55:05   #
Pat Riot
 
SSDD wrote:
SCOTUS, as with any and all judges/justices at various levels throughout the judicial system, they are held to fairly high standards and they should at all times do their level best to meet those standards and I would assume the majority do a fair job of living up to that very obligation. The reason that pat riot thinks otherwise is that he NEEDS to think that way in order to justify his continued support of Trump even with the mountains of mounting evidence of Trump's buffoonery, incompetence, refusal to adhere to the constitution of the United States and his refusal to honor his oath of office. Of course the RW fringe media that makes up for most, if not all, of pat riot's intake of current affairs have been spinning the facts and just plain outright lying to their audience in support of Trump, as I am sure is evidenced in the video pat riot posted in his reply to me that I will not be watching, I have little tolerance for RW nut job commentary so I don't watch any of it. To be fair, I also tend to not be too into watching LW opinion commentators either.


As trying to prove that the justices HAVE been doing their jobs the way in which they are meant to be done is essentially the same thing as trying to prove a negative, that there was no impropriety, I will not bother posting links to prove/disprove anything of this one.


Edit: Of course pat riot is free to attempt to prove a positive, that the justices acted inappropriately, if they can.
SCOTUS, as with any and all judges/justices at var... (show quote)


Your own words convict you of bubble-itis. You refuse to look at any evidence contrary to your rotten ideology. You've just proven yourself to be a Kool-Aid drinking, group thinker. The video contains official testimony at a public hearing. Watch it & LEARN SOMETHING! But I fear you are now completely brainwashed by the radical Leftist, Marxist, propaganda spewing media. Have a nice life.

Reply
Dec 20, 2020 18:57:38   #
SSDD
 
dtucker300 wrote:
What Trump did as a private citizen has no bearing on what he did as President. Most of the lawsuits you attribute to Trump regarding the election were filed by other parties. You will claim they were all part of the Trump team of course. What about the hundreds of lawyers the Democrats sent around the country filing over 300 cases to change voting rules and election laws. The Pennsylvania SC clearly broke Pennsylvania law when they ruled to allow unsolicited mail-in ballots with three extra days to receive them, changing the rules of the game without allowing the electorate to vote on these changes as required by law.

Your problem is that you have such disdain for Trump, the Republican Party, and Conservatives that you lump them all together as right-wingers. Most of your discursive diatribes are disparaging, rude, and contemptuous of anyone with a different opinion than yours so that you invite disrespect from others. That's why they and you can't have civil discourse.
What Trump did as a private citizen has no bearing... (show quote)


Ah, so because he filed 1000s of frivolous lawsuits as a private citizen, he will NEVER do the same as president? How many of his character flaws have YOU seen disappear after he entered the oval office?

No, he is still up to his same old tricks, nothing new to see here. That is exactly why there is concern that his cadre of liars.... Err.... I meant lawyers, may soon be facing legal ramifications of their dishonest push to overturn a free and fair election.

Reply
Dec 20, 2020 19:10:18   #
SSDD
 
Pat Riot wrote:
Your own words convict you of bubble-itis. You refuse to look at any evidence contrary to your rotten ideology. You've just proven yourself to be a Kool-Aid drinking, group thinker. The video contains official testimony at a public hearing. Watch it & LEARN SOMETHING! But I fear you are now completely brainwashed by the radical Leftist, Marxist, propaganda spewing media. Have a nice life.


Incorrect and dishonest attempt to discredit me. No, IF you produce ACTUAL evidence, not bloviated RW biased political commentary but ACTUAL evidence, I am more than willing to look it over, I just won't suffer your RW nut job blowhards. Go find where a judge threw out VALID evidence, where a judge shows bias in deciding to sustain a frivolous objection against Trump's team or shoot down a valid objection from Trump's team. Something, anything that shows the justices were unfairly ruling against Trump's team. Opinion and commentary does not prove a damned thing other than the biased opinion of the RW nut job giving the commentary.

The one living in a bubble is you, there is much news, facts and truths that DO NOT need biased, opinionated RW blowhard nut job commentators to reveal it. It is the preferred way to receive news for those of us that DO NOT need our opinions spoon fed to us, to get it through ACTUAL news, facts and truths, WITHOUT the biased spin added or at the very least, with minimal biased spin added.

I know, how cruel of me to point out your shortcomings, the fact that you NEED to have your own opinions spoon fed to you for you to know how you feel about things, that isn't my problem, that's your problem, live with it!

Reply
Dec 21, 2020 12:19:55   #
Pat Riot
 
SSDD wrote:
Incorrect and dishonest attempt to discredit me. No, IF you produce ACTUAL evidence, not bloviated RW biased political commentary but ACTUAL evidence, I am more than willing to look it over, I just won't suffer your RW nut job blowhards. Go find where a judge threw out VALID evidence, where a judge shows bias in deciding to sustain a frivolous objection against Trump's team or shoot down a valid objection from Trump's team. Something, anything that shows the justices were unfairly ruling against Trump's team. Opinion and commentary does not prove a damned thing other than the biased opinion of the RW nut job giving the commentary.

The one living in a bubble is you, there is much news, facts and truths that DO NOT need biased, opinionated RW blowhard nut job commentators to reveal it. It is the preferred way to receive news for those of us that DO NOT need our opinions spoon fed to us, to get it through ACTUAL news, facts and truths, WITHOUT the biased spin added or at the very least, with minimal biased spin added.

I know, how cruel of me to point out your shortcomings, the fact that you NEED to have your own opinions spoon fed to you for you to know how you feel about things, that isn't my problem, that's your problem, live with it!
Incorrect and dishonest attempt to discredit me. N... (show quote)


You're quite the obtuse one, aren't you? What do you not get about TESTIMONY, BY A SWORN-IN WITNESS? NOT opinion! If only you would stop listening to the mainstream Marxist media, who are now a wing of the Democrat Party, all of which are controlled by the Corporations/deep state/oligarchs trying to destroy America's middle class. It's all around you, my brainwashed friend. Have you not noticed that Big Tech has been censoring conservative posts on Facebook, that Google owned YouTube has taken down over 8000 videos of anything remotely positing evidence of election fraud? No one can tweet on Twitter unless bogus "fact checkers" with an agenda are right there to filter & comment. Sounds like the Chinese Communist tyrannical way of speech suppression, right?
In fact, our nation is under an all-out assault from China, Iran & maybe Russia. They've cyber-attacked our government & businesses in ways we never thought possible. You can't get Disney, Nike, Silicon Valley and myriad other corporations to say anything negative about China. Chinese money has inundated our universities, hundreds of big companies & even more politicians (Republican & Democrat). And that's what is really going on here. If you can't see that, you're totally blind - or maybe YOU are a Chinese troller here on this site? It's a more than reasonable explanation of why you post such hysterical drivel on this thread. Is that right, SSDD? Or should I say, Wang Fong?

Reply
Dec 21, 2020 13:52:04   #
SSDD
 
Pat Riot wrote:
You're quite the obtuse one, aren't you? What do you not get about TESTIMONY, BY A SWORN-IN WITNESS? NOT opinion! If only you would stop listening to the mainstream Marxist media, who are now a wing of the Democrat Party, all of which are controlled by the Corporations/deep state/oligarchs trying to destroy America's middle class. It's all around you, my brainwashed friend. Have you not noticed that Big Tech has been censoring conservative posts on Facebook, that Google owned YouTube has taken down over 8000 videos of anything remotely positing evidence of election fraud? No one can tweet on Twitter unless bogus "fact checkers" with an agenda are right there to filter & comment. Sounds like the Chinese Communist tyrannical way of speech suppression, right?
In fact, our nation is under an all-out assault from China, Iran & maybe Russia. They've cyber-attacked our government & businesses in ways we never thought possible. You can't get Disney, Nike, Silicon Valley and myriad other corporations to say anything negative about China. Chinese money has inundated our universities, hundreds of big companies & even more politicians (Republican & Democrat). And that's what is really going on here. If you can't see that, you're totally blind - or maybe YOU are a Chinese troller here on this site? It's a more than reasonable explanation of why you post such hysterical drivel on this thread. Is that right, SSDD? Or should I say, Wang Fong?
You're quite the obtuse one, aren't you? What do y... (show quote)


Sorry, I don't trust you Trumplicans enough to watch any videos you post. Trumplicans have proven to be completely dishonest and enjoy posting videos of their favorite, most hateful RW nut job commentators so I made it a rule to NEVER look at videos posted by Trumplicans, it works out well, I don't get subjected to RW nut job commentators that way. If you don't like it, blame your fellow Trumplicans for their dishonesty.

If you are trying to claim that you are the exception to the rule, that Trumplicans are dishonest by nature, I think not, look at your chosen user name, "pat riot", there is nothing "patriotic" about supporting someone like Trump, in fact, supporting Trump makes you the antithesis of patriotic. Oh yeah, you never expected anyone but a Trump supporter to figure out your nom de guerre. Hate to break it to you, People who are NOT trumplicans are much more likely to figure it out than Trumplicans, the Trumplicans tend to be of lower intellect and much more dense.

As for the video in question, I still don't trust you and so I may or may not bother checking into this video you posted, depends on if I choose to carve out the time to bother with it. I did however catch Giuliani's "star witness" on the stand during that congressional inquiry. Is that the witness that appears in your video? If so, I need not bother with your video, I saw quite enough of the drunken, delusional, quite possibly paranoid schizophrenic mental patient that even Rudy was trying to get to tone down her rhetoric and THAT is saying something, Rudy himself is unhinged and proud to prove it with every appearance on T.V., radio or in print. Yeah, if that is the "witness" of which you speak, the only one they seem to have, you aren't going to sway anybody with that one.

If you wish to sway people to your side, you should present ACTUAL evidence, you know, that thing Trump, Trump's legal team, his supporters and all his enablers can't seem to present, that thing. It will be much more convincing than the opinions of fringe-right RW wingnut commentators and the paranoid delusions of a mental patient doing her level best to self medicate with the apparent usage of illicit drugs and alcohol. None of that is very convincing.


Edit: As for your claim of "censorship" by "big tech"... Ah, now you believing the "testimony" of an over-self-medicated mental patient that EVEN Giuliani thinks is insane, well, now you believing her makes much more sense, you too are a mental patient with paranoid delusions too. It all makes sense now. No, the "censorship" of "big tech", that is just an attempt at eliminating dis-information and enforcing the respective ToS's. if someone does not wish to be "censored", all they need to do is abide by the ToS in play for that site and don't post dis-information and viola, no censorship will be felt by them. Seek OFFICIAL help and stop self-medicating, you aren't likely a trained psychologist or psychiatrist and even if you were, a doctor that practices on themselves has a fool for a patient.

Reply
Dec 21, 2020 14:08:25   #
Pat Riot
 
SSDD wrote:
Sorry, I don't trust you Trumplicans enough to watch any videos you post. Trumplicans have proven to be completely dishonest and enjoy posting videos of their favorite, most hateful RW nut job commentators so I made it a rule to NEVER look at videos posted by Trumplicans, it works out well, I don't get subjected to RW nut job commentators that way. If you don't like it, blame your fellow Trumplicans for their dishonesty.

If you are trying to claim that you are the exception to the rule, that Trumplicans are dishonest by nature, I think not, look at your chosen user name, "pat riot", there is nothing "patriotic" about supporting someone like Trump, in fact, supporting Trump makes you the antithesis of patriotic. Oh yeah, you never expected anyone but a Trump supporter to figure out your nom de guerre. Hate to break it to you, People who are NOT trumplicans are much more likely to figure it out than Trumplicans, the Trumplicans tend to be of lower intellect and much more dense.

As for the video in question, I still don't trust you and so I may or may not bother checking into this video you posted, depends on if I choose to carve out the time to bother with it. I did however catch Giuliani's "star witness" on the stand during that congressional inquiry. Is that the witness that appears in your video? If so, I need not bother with your video, I saw quite enough of the drunken, delusional, quite possibly paranoid schizophrenic mental patient that even Rudy was trying to get to tone down her rhetoric and THAT is saying something, Rudy himself is unhinged and proud to prove it with every appearance on T.V., radio or in print. Yeah, if that is the "witness" of which you speak, the only one they seem to have, you aren't going to sway anybody with that one.

If you wish to sway people to your side, you should present ACTUAL evidence, you know, that thing Trump, Trump's legal team, his supporters and all his enablers can't seem to present, that thing. It will be much more convincing than the opinions of fringe-right RW wingnut commentators and the paranoid delusions of a mental patient doing her level best to self medicate with the apparent usage of illicit drugs and alcohol. None of that is very convincing.
Sorry, I don't trust you Trumplicans enough to wat... (show quote)


I'm a patriot because I hold the U.S. Constitution sacrosanct - not because of Trump or any fallible person. You, on the other hand are either a Chinese troll or an ostrich with your head in the sand. If only those Marxist "trees" would get out of the way, you could actually see the forest! And BTW, the witness in the 2 minute video is a man, my obstinate & myopic comrade. As far as I'm concerned, this is 1776 again and you're a Tory.

Reply
Check out topic: Pretending It All Works
Dec 21, 2020 14:08:58   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
Is anyone still paying any attention to what Same $#!+ Different Day has to say?

Reply
Dec 21, 2020 14:56:50   #
GoCubs Loc: Earth
 
dtucker300 wrote:
Is anyone still paying any attention to what Same $#!+ Different Day has to say?


Lol.

Reply
Dec 21, 2020 15:37:04   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
GoCubs wrote:
Lol.


Yup. Move along folks. Nothing to see here.

Reply
Dec 21, 2020 15:48:10   #
GoCubs Loc: Earth
 
dtucker300 wrote:
Yup. Move along folks. Nothing to see here.


Too funny!

Reply
Page <<first <prev 10 of 13 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.