The Continued Constitutional Fight for the Integrity of our National Election: https://youtu.be/CqGkLKlR6XU?t=58...

Radiance3

PeterS

Radiance3 wrote:

https://youtu.be/CqGkLKlR6XU?t=58

Well, find a court, any court, that agrees with you would be a very good start. That's the constitutional approach and the fact that even after two tries before the Supreme Court, you are still spouting this nonsense makes me think that constitutional has nothing to do with what you want at all! You want someone who agrees with you, and the more the merrier--whether it's constitutional or not--has NOTHING to do with it at all...

Am I right? Don't answer, I know that I am...

Radiance3

PeterS wrote:

Well, find a court, any court, that agrees with you would be a very good start. That's the constitutional approach and the fact that even after two tries before the Supreme Court, you are still spouting this nonsense makes me think that constitutional has nothing to do with what you want at all! You want someone who agrees with you, and the more the merrier--whether it's constitutional or not--has NOTHING to do with it at all...

Am I right? Don't answer, I know that I am...

==================
They are afraid to be labeled "RACIST".
Most Courts are under the hypnotism of Barack Obama the 50% Kenyan. He continues his "hope and change" for America. He will be able to doing that thru Kamala the Jamaican . Both Barack and Kamala are 50% black.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

PeterS wrote:

Well, find a court, any court, that agrees with you would be a very good start. That's the constitutional approach and the fact that even after two tries before the Supreme Court, you are still spouting this nonsense makes me think that constitutional has nothing to do with what you want at all! You want someone who agrees with you, and the more the merrier--whether it's constitutional or not--has NOTHING to do with it at all...

Am I right? Don't answer, I know that I am...

More like find a court who will actually read it or listen to it, at all. Bunch of chicken poops!

John Meoff

PeterS wrote:

Well, find a court, any court, that agrees with you would be a very good start. That's the constitutional approach and the fact that even after two tries before the Supreme Court, you are still spouting this nonsense makes me think that constitutional has nothing to do with what you want at all! You want someone who agrees with you, and the more the merrier--whether it's constitutional or not--has NOTHING to do with it at all...

Am I right? Don't answer, I know that I am...

There is still PLENTY of room for challenges, constitutionally. Were the shoe on the other foot, you'd be cheering.
You're as predictable as the sun rising from the East.

bahmer

Radiance3 wrote:

https://youtu.be/CqGkLKlR6XU?t=58

WOW that was an awfully inspiring video there Radiance3 thanks for posting this.

maryla

Radiance3 wrote:

https://youtu.be/CqGkLKlR6XU?t=58

This new article in Epoch Times says the same thing: Peter Navarro, who serves as an adviser to President Donald Trump, concluded in a report on the integrity of the 2020 election that the allegations of irregularities are serious enough to warrant an urgent probe and substantial enough to overturn the results.

MSM has failed the public.