One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
It didn't take long for Democrats to come for your guns.
Page <<first <prev 8 of 15 next> last>>
Dec 15, 2020 19:20:40   #
Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio
 
Grugore wrote:
Or someone defending themselves against the military.


Are you afraid the military might attack the population ?
To accomplish what ?

The Military Boogieman ?
Trump has come the closest to using the military force to take over control of the country. But, I guess you would’ve been ok with that.

Reply
Dec 15, 2020 19:25:02   #
Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio
 
drlarrygino wrote:
The Australians have just released a list of over 2 million members of the CCP who have infiltrated our government, our big businesses and our social media. 30 round mags aren't large enough to take down all these vermin who are traitors to our country. 60 round mags might be the answer.


That’s funny !
The Australians have collected all the their guns from the citizens voluntarily.
The CCP Would do better there, expanding where there are no guns.
Right ?

Reply
Dec 15, 2020 19:32:03   #
Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio
 
hdjimv wrote:
They do want our guns, and there are plenty of laws already for the idiots spraying bullets across the universe. They just need to enforce them. Without the second amendment, how long do you think it would be before THEY would be coming to take away your right to speak your idiotic opinions? How long do you think it would take for THEM to wipe out all your other rights? The 2nd is the only thing keeping THEM from doing that.


I think trump was already doing all that.
The republicans definitely would like to do all that.
But you can’t blame anyone but Dems.
I don’t get it !
Who’s lying here.

Reply
 
 
Dec 15, 2020 19:38:39   #
Grugore
 
You don't think at all. You're like a parrot. Parroting everything the msm feeds you.
Milosia2 wrote:
I think trump was already doing all that.
The republicans definitely would like to do all that.
But you can’t blame anyone but Dems.
I don’t get it !
Who’s lying here.

Reply
Dec 15, 2020 19:50:57   #
Comment Loc: California
 
GoCubs wrote:
There are more guns than people in the United States (400 million are in circulation for a population of 330 million). In just the first six months of 2020, approximately 19 million firearms have been sold, representing more than one firearm for every 20 Americans. How do you think they're going to take them all, J? It would be impossible - think about it. A buy back program would result in a few hundred thousand citizens participating. How do they get the rest? To try would result in colossal loss of life - mostly law enforcement lives. That ship has left the harbor, you can't put toothpaste back in the tube, etc, J. And yes, I see no reason why a civilian would have a legitimate use for a 30 round mag. I'm open to argument on that though, so feel free to state why you fell otherwise.
There are more guns than people in the United Stat... (show quote)

Don't forget to ban cars. Cars kill far more people than guns. Your argument is stupid. U have no right to tell me what I can own.

Reply
Dec 15, 2020 19:57:01   #
Comment Loc: California
 
Grugore wrote:
😜🤪😛😂🤣
Someone really needs to beat you upside the head with a clue stick.



Reply
Dec 15, 2020 20:04:25   #
teabag09
 
GoCubs wrote:
I am tempted to go to your standard reply of nwr that you use every time you disagree w/ someone but don't have the balls to defend, but I would never lower myself to that degree. You really believe you need "a 100 round clip" to protect yourself? You must be one shitty shot.


It's not a 100 round clip. A clip is used to load magazines. The military history buffs among you probably already know the difference between clips and magazines, but other people might not be as informed. A clip is a device used to load a magazine, and a magazine is a device or holding area where ammunition is fed into the chamber of a firearm. It really is as simple as that. Mike

Reply
Check out topic: What so many do not know....
Dec 15, 2020 20:08:52   #
Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio
 
teabag09 wrote:
It's not a 100 round clip. A clip is used to load magazines. The military history buffs among you probably already know the difference between clips and magazines, but other people might not be as informed. A clip is a device used to load a magazine, and a magazine is a device or holding area where ammunition is fed into the chamber of a firearm. It really is as simple as that. Mike


Error

Reply
Dec 15, 2020 20:11:04   #
teabag09
 
JFlorio wrote:
I don’t consider my AR-15 an assault rifle. Hell a .223 isn’t much bigger than the .22. Again, according to the Constitution you don’t make the rules.


A .223 or a 5.56 is the same diameter, .224 as a .22 short, long or long rifle. The difference is the slug gets to the target in 1/3 the time which can be devastating because speed kills. Mike

Reply
Dec 15, 2020 20:11:41   #
Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio
 
Grugore wrote:
You don't think at all. You're like a parrot. Parroting everything the msm feeds you.


I am not a fan of MSM,
I go with independent news sources.

Reply
Dec 15, 2020 20:38:11   #
JeffK56barker
 
Milosia2 wrote:
I am an American Citizen and I pay taxes.
I believe it’s a reasonable expectation that when I go outside that I don’t need to worry about being shot by you or your klan.
I pay for police protection.
Why do you think you should be able to override my rights to safety because you believe your gun rights are more important than my safety ?


That's because you are a pussy... Government, I am too stupid to run my life, Please hold my hand.

Reply
Check out topic: Presidential Immunity
Dec 15, 2020 20:38:36   #
wilpharm
 
JeffK56barker wrote:
Hey dumb shit... What part of the 2nd admentment don't you understand???? READ IT... Firearms and other weapons of war to the people ARE NOT TO BE INFRINGED... (THAT MEANS NOT TO BE FUCKED WITH). But then again, you cry babies would not understand. You scream our masters will tell us how to live. We are too stupid to run our our lives, Tell and show us how to live.



Reply
Dec 15, 2020 20:40:53   #
teabag09
 
marinevet73 wrote:
I agree with you 100%. I think they will approve background checks, and limits on assault weapons and bump stocks. They have to be rational.


As a long time gun owner and a NRA life member, I have no problem with background checks which I think in most places are mandatory, at least here in Virginia they are. Under Gov. George Allen (R) we had 3 strikes and you're in jail with no parole and violent crime went way down, especially gun crime. Gov., now Sen., Mark Warner (D) did away with it and crime spiked.

As far assault weapons go, I don't consider any of my AR-15s to be assault weapons as they are semi-auto and not what you used while serving our country which I personally thank you for. My AR-15s are fun to shoot.

With the higher capacity magazines reloading is reduced which increases shooting time. For hunting I use a 5 round magazine but for range shooting I prefer a 20 round.

As for bump stocks, I agree they are useless and probably dangerous but you can achieve the same effect using a belt loop so to me it is sort of a moot point I'd be glad to throw in for the anti-gunners to chew on.

I can see where you are coming from and agree with some of your points and and AR-15 can in the wrong hands be a devastating weapon but the statics show they are rarely used. Hand guns kill way more people, in fact, hammers and the such kill way more people than ARs do every year.

My 12ga. Mossberg loves #1 buckshot. The 3" shell that I shoot have 24 individual 1/4" balls in each round. That's more rounds down range in one trigger pull than I can send with a 20 magazine in my AR-15.

Marinevet73, I thank you again for your service to our wellbeing and I wish you and your family a Merry Christmas and a prosperous New Year. Mike

Reply
Dec 15, 2020 20:47:40   #
teabag09
 
marinevet73 wrote:
I don't usually respond to stupid, but I'll make an exception this time.

I would have done what Europe did. They have about the same population(more actually) and far less cases and deaths. I would have done what Taiwan, Japan, and Vietnam did.

I would have followed science. I would have gotten several software companies to come up with tracking programs. I would have expanded testing methods and materials. I would have pushed Congress to get out funding bills to make this happen.

I would not have hidden in the White House for the last month and a half while the virus is going gang busters.

And what would you have done? Please don't tell me you would have copied trump.
I don't usually respond to stupid, but I'll make a... (show quote)


You seem to forget we are a nation comprised of 50 individual States and a couple of territories and it is up to the States to protect their own. The President acted on information as he got it and shut down incoming as soon as he was advised.

Which science would you have followed? The science was bouncing back and forth like a ping pong ball. Nice try but the science was FUBAR! Mike

Reply
Dec 15, 2020 20:55:43   #
JeffK56barker
 
Milosia2 wrote:
Are the Armed White Evangelical Supremacist Christians Law Abiding Citizens ?
Or are they just American Terrorists?


Yes, they are... Are you nothing but buttsniffing socialist demorat cockroaches?? Which part of a rifle do you put to your shoulder?? Never mind, just swing a daisy at them.. That would work.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 8 of 15 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.