Michael10 wrote:
Keven, haven't you heard there was massive fraud that there's no evidence of happening. These guys were so slick they scammed hard core Republican and Democrat states into believing Biden got more votes, just because he did. I guess they forgot to fraud the Senate vote Democrats need so bad to control the house but they sure did Trump an injustice...NOT
Some people will believe anything their cult leader says.
I don't know if it is mass hysteria or mass hypnosis or if it is just the protracted erosion of human intelligence by ideological propaganda that drove the left into a frenzy of wicked machinations, deception and chicanery in their attempt to destroy president Trump and throw him out of office. They tried every underhanded and subversive trick in their playbook to oust him and added more as each attempt failed. The Machiavellian schemes and diabolical unscrupulousness of their attempts to overthrow an election, destroy a president, and throw him out of office are unprecedented in American history.
For four plus years, the Grand Poobahs of the Socialist Progressive movement, without principle, without compassion or remorse, have waged an aggressive war on president Trump, they demonized him, his wife, his family and everyone he ever came in contact with, and in the process destroyed the lives of men associated with him. They investigated him, tore his entire life apart, attempted to remove him through impeachment on bogus charges, damned him, condemned him, spit in his face, dragged him through the coals, blamed him for every misfortune and tragedy known to man, disenfranchised 80 million Americans who support him; they violated our Constitution and the rule of law to get Trump out of office, everything short of killing him, and that option was not off the table. They failed on every count.
And, you deluded fools actually believe your demonic power brokers would suddenly cease fire and withdraw from another attempt to throw him out of office? This time through an institutionalized voter fraud campaign?
The notion that all of these summary dismissals of law suits around the country are proof positive that election corruption and voter fraud never occurred, that the complaints are all a "Trump conspiracy theory" is absolute bullshit.
The complaints on voter fraud filed in all civil courts were based on sufficient evidence necessary to file such a complaint, including, but not limited to, physical and documentary evidence, witness affidavits and testimonials sworn under penalty of perjury, and so forth. However, the complaint is simply filed to put the defendant on notice, it is filed on a reasonable basis in fact and law, the allegations can be made on information and belief.
Traditionally, in accord with federal courts' system of notice pleading, complaints did not need to be very specific, and did not need to specify the facts the plaintiff intends to prove. The Supreme Court introduced a heightened standard for complaints in 2007 with the case Bell Atlantic v. Twombly. This case requires that a complaint must allege "enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face." IOW, the complaint is an allegation of wrong doing, introduction of evidence is not required to justify the legitimacy of the complaint. It is in the next stage - Discovery - when evidence comes into play and again in Pre-trial proceedings, then, in the Trial stage, the evidence and the witnesses are introduced in their entirety.
In all dismissals of voter fraud complaints, the judges (courts) did not allow the Plaintiff the right to Discovery. Wonder why?
PA Senator Doug Mastriano, "Beam me up, Scotty, no sign of intelligent life anywhere."Michigan witnesses to voter fraud: "THE MOST CORRUPT THING I'VE EVER SEEN"Following the election, when multiple reports of voting chicanery circulated on the Internet and it became apparent voter fraud had, in fact, been committed on a large scale, several groups of statisticians and other scientists volunteered to examine the reported Pennsylvania results from a scientific statistical perspective. These scientists included:
a former adjunct professor of statistics at Cornell University,
a PhD risk analyst and President of a Denver-based applied operations research and analytics company specializing in data science and statistics,
an adjunct professor of statistics at North Carolina State University, the University of Waterloo and the University of British Columbia, and,
a number of scientists in the fields of statistics and analytics.
They studied the 2020 Pennsylvania voting records to identify anything they deemed to be statistically significant anomalies — i.e deviations from the norm.
In the process they by-and-large worked separately, consulted with other experts, analyzed the data they were given from different perspectives, obtained some additional data on their own — all in a very limited time allotment.
Their one — and only — objective was to try to assure that every legal Pennsylvania vote is counted, and only legal Pennsylvania votes are counted.
This is their report The statistical information compiled in this report is mind blowing.
ALL of these experts came to the same conclusions:
1) There are some major statistical aberrations in the PA voting records, that are extremely unlikely to occur in a normal (i.e. un-manipulated) setting.
2) The anomalies almost exclusively happened with the Biden votes. Time and again, using a variety of techniques, the Trump votes looked statistically normal.
3) Eleven (out of 67) Pennsylvania counties stood out from all the rest. These counties showed distinctive signs of voting abnormalities — again, all for Biden.
4) The total number of suspicious votes in these counties is 300,000 — which greatly exceeds the reported margin of Biden votes over Trump. (We don’t know how many of these are artificial Biden votes, or votes switched from Trump to Biden.)
5) These statistical analyses do not prove fraud, but rather provide scientific evidence that the reported results are highly unlikely to be an accurate reflection of how Pennsylvania citizens voted.In addition,
234 pages of affidavits, sworn under penalty of perjury by witnesses to voter fraud can be read HERE All affidavits are notarized.
The chart below, taken from the report mentioned, shows a comparison of vote counts in a number of Pennsylvania counties. As you can see, all vote counts for Biden in the 2020 election exceeded by significant margin those for Obama in 2008 and 2012 and for Clinton in 2016.