Republican-controlled state legislatures can rectify election fraud committed by courts and governors

By the proper power our Constitution gives them.

Who determines the outcome of the presidential election in a given state? Governors? Secretaries of state or boards of election superintendents? The courts? Fox News' decision desk? Nope. The president wins a state when electors selected by state legislatures conduct a vote in their respective states on Dec. 14. Thus, ultimately, according to the Constitution, the state legislators wind up serving as the kingmakers in a disputed election.

Endless pots of unverified mail-in ballots that often fail to meet state election law standards weren't created overnight at 3 a.m. on Nov. 4. They were created by a mix of illegal administrative actions taken by Democrat administrations in the key states and state and lower federal courts overriding long-standing state election laws. This has been going on for years, but accelerated to a fever pitch over the past few months.

The Constitution, in Art. I, §4, cl. 1, gives state legislatures the power over the times, methods, and procedures of elections and provides no "public health emergency" exception that enables governors or judges to override them and create a new system for elections. At its core, this is why we have such post-election chaos, and it was by design – set in motion for years by the courts and crystalized over the past few months by using COVID-19 to remake the in-person voting electorate into a postal ballot free-for-all, in what Justice Gorsuch described as the greatest judicial intervention in elections in 230 years.

Well, now state legislatures can have their revenge and have the final say, as intended by the Constitution. Mark Levin reminded his audience today that state legislatures are the ones who choose the electors who directly vote for president in each state.

Mark R. Levin
@marklevinshow
REMINDER TO THE REPUBLICAN STATE LEGISLATURES, YOU HAVE THE FINAL SAY OVER THE CHOOSING OF ELECTORS, NOT ANY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, SECRETARY OF STATE, GOVERNOR, OR EVEN COURT. YOU HAVE THE FINAL SAY -- ARTICLE II OF THE FED CONSTITUTION. SO, GET READY TO DO YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY

In case you think this is some desperate tactic Levin has concocted because he doesn't like the impending results of the state ballot tallies, he has been warning about this for months. While everyone slept as the courts rewrote election law, Levin, a constitutional lawyer, warned on Sept. 18, "As in Pennsylvania, the Michigan legislature is controlled by the Republicans. They must meet in emergency session and exercise their Article II power under the federal Constitution and seize back control over the election system."

In the run-up to the election, courts have allowed "late voting, namely submission of ballots after Election Day so long as they are postmarked before. In addition, a Michigan court allowed ballot-harvesting under certain circumstances, which appears to have occurred late at night in Wayne County. There has been a series of rulings or administrative decisions in numerous states, which are contrary to state law and in some cases federal election law, that enabled Democrats to upend the electoral process – putting aside questions of additional fraud in the early morning of Nov. 4.

Liberals say they want every vote to count, but having votes submitted by insidious special-interest groups that violate the terms and conditions of absentee balloting ensures that the lawfully cast votes of individuals indeed do not count. We can debate the policy merits of some of these anomalous voting procedures, but everyone agrees that state legislatures control the process. In many blue states, they have already codified Democrat priorities on ballot-harvesting, registration deadlines (or lack thereof), and weak voter verification systems. But in states like Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania, there were laws on the books that were illegally ignored by the Democrat governors and the courts.

In his 2005 book "Men in Black," Levin noted that the reason the Supreme Court ruling on the Florida recount in 2000 was final was not because the courts are supreme over the electoral process. Quite the contrary, the Supreme Court was merely rectifying a mistake the state court made, because Democrats were the ones who involved the courts in the election process to begin with. But why did Al Gore ultimately accept the decision in Bush v. Gore?

"The Florida legislature could have (and, in fact, was preparing) to intervene and name a slate of electors if the Florida Supreme Court continued to interfere with the election," wrote Levin on page 170. "The legislature, which was controlled by the Republican Party in 2000, had absolute authority under the Constitution to choose Florida's members of the electoral college."

Art. II, Sec. 1, §2 of the Constitution stipulates that "Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct" the electors to vote for president. The Constitution gives Congress the authority to set the date of that vote, which, pursuant to 3 U.S.C. §7, is the Monday after the second Wednesday in December of presidential election years. This year it is Dec. 14.

Notice how the Constitution specifically gives the job of choosing electors to the legislature, and unlike with standard legislation, there is no shared jurisdiction or responsibility with the governor, much less some random state or federal judge. Charles Pinckney, one of the signers of the Constitution from South Carolina, reiterated on the Senate floor on Jan. 23, 1800, how careful the framers were to cut Congress out of the process.

"The Electors are to be appointed by each State, and the whole direction as to the manner of their appointment is given to the State Legislatures," said Pinckney during a Senate debate. "Nothing was more clear … that Congress had no right to meddle with it at all; as the whole was entrusted to the State Legislatures, they must make provision for all questions arising on the occasion."

Technically, this means that state legislatures could even appoint electors and completely avoid or cancel out popular election ballots we have today, at least for the president and vice president. This was the practice in some states in the early days of the republic. As Justice Joseph Story wrote in his 1833 "Commentaries on the Constitution," state legislatures choosing the electors themselves "has been firmly established in practice, ever since the adoption of the constitution, and does not now seem to admit of controversy, even if a suitable tribunal existed to adjudicate upon it."

Indeed, in 1892 (McPherson v. Blacker), in upholding Michigan's practice of dividing the state's electors by congressional district (as done today in Maine and Nebraska), the Supreme Court wrote, "The legislature possesses plenary authority to direct the manner of appointment, and might itself exercise the appointing power by joint ballot or concurrence of the two houses, or according to such mode as it designated." In Bush v. Gore, the high court reiterated that any state legislature "may, if it so chooses, select the electors itself."

Obviously, none of us wants to abolish popular elections, but why would the Constitution even grant state legislatures such power? Well, the framers understood that, unlike Congress, these are the bodies that are closest and most accountable to the people, and unlike judges or executives (state or federal), they are numerous in a deliberative body and won't wield unilateral authority without some degree of consensus.

By overriding the legislatures in how to properly conduct the popular elections that choose these presidential electors, the courts and governors have disenfranchised their voters. A Michigan court extended Election Day for two weeks. A Pennsylvania court, along with the Democrat secretary of state, essentially nullified signature verification for mail-in ballots.

Thus, if there is ample evidence of voter fraud that would be sufficient to alter the will of the people through this popular election, it is incumbent upon the state legislatures in those states to reclaim their authority over the Electoral College and rectify the fraud that has upended our election process.

Okay Guys, check this out and I have to thank BladeRunner for posting this. Here is what he posted:



Now based upon what Blade Runner Posted, and this changes the Electoral Map tremendously. The following is the control of the 50 states and their legislators and by party electoral vote goes to Trump or Biden:


1. Alabama-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
2. Alaska-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
3. Arizona-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
4. Arkansas-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
5. California-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)-Biden
6. Colorado-(House-Democrat, Senate- Republican)-Biden
7. Connecticut-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)-Biden
8. Delaware-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)-Biden
9. Florida-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
10. Georgia-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
11. Hawaii-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)-Biden
12. Idaho-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
13. Illinois-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
14. Indiana-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
15. Iowa-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
16. Kansas-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
17. Kentucky-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
18. Louisiana-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
19. Maine-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
20. Maryland-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
21. Massachusetts-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
22. Michigan-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
23. Minnesota-(House-Democrat, Senate- Republican)Undecided. Could go either way.
24. Mississippi-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
25. Missouri-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
26. Montana-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
27. Nebraska-(trifectas-Republican)Trump
28. Nevada-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
29. New Hampshire-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
30. New Jersey-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
31. New Mexico-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
32. New York-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
33. North Carolina-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)
34. North Dakota-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
35. Ohio-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
36. Oklahoma-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
37. Oregon-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
38. Pennsylvania-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
39. Rhode Island-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
40. South Carolina-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
41. South Dakota-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
42. Tennessee-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
43. Texas-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
44. Utah-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
45. Vermont-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
46. Virginia-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
47. Washington-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
48. West Virginia-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
49. Wisconsin-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
50. Wyoming-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump

Now Highlighted above are the six states that are in contention or where there is voter fraud going on. So if the state legislators would take over when they have to decide on the electorities, it is perfectly legal for these legislators to vote for their parties candidate. Making them responsible to the will of the people. Therefore, if it is done in this election then the score card for 270 would look like this:

Trump = 279 and Biden = 259

Now that's about what it should look like. Spread this with your friends and family. Let's see if we can make it go viral.

Okay Guys, check this out and I have to thank BladeRunner for posting this. Here is what he posted:



Now based upon what Blade Runner Posted, and this changes the Electoral Map tremendously. The following is the control of the 50 states and their legislators and by party electoral vote goes to Trump or Biden:


1. Alabama-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
2. Alaska-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
3. Arizona-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
4. Arkansas-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
5. California-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)-Biden
6. Colorado-(House-Democrat, Senate- Republican)-Biden
7. Connecticut-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)-Biden
8. Delaware-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)-Biden
9. Florida-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
10. Georgia-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
11. Hawaii-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)-Biden
12. Idaho-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
13. Illinois-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
14. Indiana-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
15. Iowa-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
16. Kansas-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
17. Kentucky-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
18. Louisiana-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
19. Maine-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
20. Maryland-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
21. Massachusetts-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
22. Michigan-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
23. Minnesota-(House-Democrat, Senate- Republican)Undecided. Could go either way.
24. Mississippi-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
25. Missouri-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
26. Montana-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
27. Nebraska-(trifectas-Republican)Trump
28. Nevada-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
29. New Hampshire-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
30. New Jersey-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
31. New Mexico-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
32. New York-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
33. North Carolina-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)
34. North Dakota-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
35. Ohio-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
36. Oklahoma-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
37. Oregon-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
38. Pennsylvania-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
39. Rhode Island-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
40. South Carolina-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
41. South Dakota-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
42. Tennessee-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
43. Texas-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
44. Utah-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
45. Vermont-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
46. Virginia-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
47. Washington-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
48. West Virginia-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
49. Wisconsin-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
50. Wyoming-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump

Now Highlighted above are the six states that are in contention or where there is voter fraud going on. So if the state legislators would take over when they have to decide on the electorities, it is perfectly legal for these legislators to vote for their parties candidate. Making them responsible to the will of the people. Therefore, if it is done in this election then the score card for 270 would look like this:

Trump = 279 and Biden = 259

Now that's about what it should look like. Spread this with your friends and family. Let's see if we can make it go viral.

Okay Guys, check this out and I have to thank BladeRunner for posting this. Here is what he posted:



Now based upon what Blade Runner Posted, and this changes the Electoral Map tremendously. The following is the control of the 50 states and their legislators and by party electoral vote goes to Trump or Biden:


1. Alabama-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
2. Alaska-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
3. Arizona-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
4. Arkansas-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
5. California-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)-Biden
6. Colorado-(House-Democrat, Senate- Republican)-Biden
7. Connecticut-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)-Biden
8. Delaware-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)-Biden
9. Florida-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
10. Georgia-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
11. Hawaii-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)-Biden
12. Idaho-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
13. Illinois-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
14. Indiana-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
15. Iowa-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
16. Kansas-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
17. Kentucky-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
18. Louisiana-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
19. Maine-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
20. Maryland-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
21. Massachusetts-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
22. Michigan-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
23. Minnesota-(House-Democrat, Senate- Republican)Undecided. Could go either way.
24. Mississippi-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
25. Missouri-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)-Trump
26. Montana-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
27. Nebraska-(trifectas-Republican)Trump
28. Nevada-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
29. New Hampshire-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
30. New Jersey-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
31. New Mexico-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
32. New York-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
33. North Carolina-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)
34. North Dakota-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
35. Ohio-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
36. Oklahoma-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
37. Oregon-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
38. Pennsylvania-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
39. Rhode Island-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
40. South Carolina-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
41. South Dakota-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
42. Tennessee-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
43. Texas-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
44. Utah-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
45. Vermont-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
46. Virginia-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
47. Washington-(House-Democrat, Senate- Democrat)Biden
48. West Virginia-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
49. Wisconsin-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump
50. Wyoming-(House-Republican, Senate- Republican)Trump

Now Highlighted above are the six states that are in contention or where there is voter fraud going on. So if the state legislators would take over when they have to decide on the electorities, it is perfectly legal for these legislators to vote for their parties candidate. Making them responsible to the will of the people. Therefore, if it is done in this election then the score card for 270 would look like this:

Trump = 279 and Biden = 259

Now that's about what it should look like. Spread this with your friends and family. Let's see if we can make it go viral.

Well we may have to go to war, not with the Dems, not yet but against the Media, for this reason:

Okay Mr. PeterS you asked for evidence, here you go:

To begin with, let me ask you this, how does foreign countries interfere in an American election? Russia uses disinformation right?

Well this is the first charge:

The media called the election for former Joe Biden. And they called him "President-elect"

According to the law, this is disinformation. Here's why- a candidate is only President-elect when the candidate's opponent concedes the election or when the electoral college elects the candidate as president. Then the candidate can be called "President-Elect" this is the two conditions that the candidate's status changes. Therefore, what the media has done, is cry 'fire' in a crowded theater.

Therefore, the Media is guilty of misinformation but there is more:

How can the Media call an election before all the votes are in? Especially when the polls are still open. In "Gore vs Bush" the Supreme Court said that the calling of the election for Gore in Florida, before the polls closed was improper and voter suppression. In the case of the 2020 election Virginia was called when Trump had 49% and Biden had 26% of the vote, and the polls were just closing. They called Arizona before the polls closed, and Trump had a modest lead in Arizona and when the call came in they predicted with perfect accuracy what the result would be down to the ballet. How is that possible, unless the media had inside information. This again is calling Fire in a crowded theater.

And there is more evidence if you want more evidence. In addition to a massive disinformation campaign against one candidate, they called the election before the electoral college voted and began calling their guy President-elect. That is against the Law. This was argued in Gore vs Bush. Therefore this is media, not Russia, interference in an American Election. The media cannot call any race, whether it be President, Senate, or House, or even the propositions until the Secretary of State of the particular state has released the certified talley.

But there is more. There was found to be a software glitch in a county of Wisconsin. This software glitch stole votes from one candidate and applied it to another. Over 3,000 votes were found that this effected. But that number is too small to effect an election right? But the same software was used in all counties of Wisconsin. There are 72 counties in the state of Wisconsin. Therefore that's 3,000 x 72 =216,000 votes changed. Now that's 1/4 of a million votes. This occured in not only Wisconsin but also other states, 30 other states, so that number could be in the millions of votes changed. but there is more

It may be negligible, but there has been found that dead people had voted in this election. And this does seem and I agree to be negligible, however the other irregularity found in this election, is the total number of registered voters is less than the total number of votes cast for the candidates. This number can be found by going to the particular state registrar office and comparing the number of registered voters to the number of votes cast, and the number of votes cast should be equal to or less than the number of registered voters. but there is more....

Voters used a sharpie on the voting ballot in Arizona, a numerous amount of ballots were affected. Total number of affected ballots is still unknown until the State reviews the ballots. The ballot has state law written on the ballot, "Use only black or blue pen ink". This was not adhered to. As a result, and just as the warning on the ballot states, "Otherwise your vote shall not be counted." per Arizona State Law. For a polster to try to guess the intent of the voter, is too much for a human being to understand therefore the vote should be thrown out. If done by mail, the voter should be notified to redo their ballot and the spoiled ballot should be thrown out. This was not done here, instead the pollster made the decision. and there is more.........

When the results were coming in, there were ballot dumps. Please explain to me and the American public, that if I had a bag of marbles, 500,000 red and 500,000 blue, and I was counting the marbles and I take a random sample of the marbles say 20,000, how can all 20,000 marbles be of just one color? What are the odds? However according to the news this was true not once but many times for Biden votes. The evidence is in the reporting of the news on election night. Are people sandbagging the ballots? or what? Did they manufacture ballots? What happened here? but there is more

Arizona was called for Biden, and Gov. Doug Ducey said, "Not so fast" and told the news media to retract their statement. The news media refused. That is calling Fire in a crowded theater for the state did not allow the media to call the state, yet the media called the state anyways. That is illegal!

Pete I like a good football, basketball, baseball, soccer, and hockey game. However when the players have to fight not only the opposing side, but also the refs I get a bit irate. And when the teams have to not only face the refs but also the local media, I get even more upset. Both are true in the 2020 election.

There is more evidence and I will post it as it comes up but this is a Contested Election, where the States have not called any election therefore no candidate is in the xxx-elect status. On top of the litigation, for example the state of Penn, broke the Constitution by going through the governor and the courts rather than the legislator to decide on state law, therefore in violation of the US Constitution. Thus the Supreme Court Justice ordered the state to segregate the ballots and not include them in the final tally, but did Penn do that? The question is unknown but to date that has not been done, and Penn is in violation of US General Election laws.

Now the Media (MSNBC, ABC, CBS, PBS, CNN, FOX) are all publishers and not covered by the same rules as Facebook, Google, and Twitter. Yet all of these are guilty of Media interference with a Presidential election.

Therefore, Sleep well little buddy, enjoy your celebration, because the hang over will be a bitch.