IRS revelations are unfolding.
May 16, 2014 12:02:35 #
And NPR? Where does that fit in?
mcjwelles wrote:
So, do I have this right, you are saying that FOX News and Entertainment is all factual and objective coverage and the rest- is just Party Line tabloid stuff? Just to get this straight you know....
May 16, 2014 12:05:33 #
mcjwelles wrote:
And NPR? Where does that fit in?
LIsten to NPR for a few weeks and you will hear its pro left bias.
May 16, 2014 17:31:25 #
mcjwelles wrote:
Well, not exactly... But if your 'objective' conc... (show quote)
Your sanctimony would be more persuasive if the abuse-of-power weren't so blatant. IRS enforcement against misallocations of dues and donations is selectively enforced. Unions, esp. Gov't employees' unions, are notorious for diverting dues to political action. Dues-payors (mandated whether the worker chooses representation or not) have complained for decades that their money was supporting unwanted candidates and legislation. IRS has historically winked at Leftist PACs' creative uses of their donations. You Leftists have real convenient double standards...
http://calwatchdog.com/2013/08/26/ca-teachers-sue-union-over-political-use-of-dues/
May 16, 2014 17:41:54 #
What do you mean Doc. They are outraged about the 10% of TEA party donors being targeted. They want to know why the other 90% weren't audited too.
docwill wrote:
Your sanctimony would be more persuasive if the ab... (show quote)
May 16, 2014 18:10:40 #
Patty wrote:
What do you mean Doc. They are outraged about the 10% of TEA party donors being targeted. They want to know why the other 90% weren't audited too.
Just a matter of time. btw, I heard a radio-caller say she was registering Democrat and sending $5 as hoped-for 'insurance.' How many are thinking similar? Obama Inc.'s Leftist thuggery works...
May 16, 2014 19:49:41 #
skott wrote:
I assumed that this fraud email just put all office supplies in "furniture."
skott: Dick Chaney just told me to tell you,"Go "@#$& yourself"
May 16, 2014 21:46:17 #
Now THERE is an a-hole I would trust to take my back. What a reassuring track record of unenlightened self (self) interest. A me-the-people example of elitist k-rap. Can't travel any more because of warrants in much of the "civilized" world. But if that's your muse....
ldsuttonjr wrote:
skott: Dick Chaney just told me to tell you,"Go "@#$& yourself"
May 16, 2014 21:54:03 #
That is true objectivity! Unions have not, on record, tried to claim non profit status to avoid paying taxes. Correct me w/appropriate citation, if, unlike, say, the NAACP, unions- an unfortunate entrenched bureaucracy after a while admittedly, have been indicted for the same gamesmanship. The wink is your own creationist justification of such gaming.
So it is only acceptable if your chosen master is your own benighted party. BTW, I have this bridge for sale...
quote=docwill]Your sanctimony would be more persuasive if the abuse-of-power weren't so blatant. IRS enforcement against misallocations of dues and donations is selectively enforced. Unions, esp. Gov't employees' unions, are notorious for diverting dues to political action. Dues-payors (mandated whether the worker chooses representation or not) have complained for decades that their money was supporting unwanted candidates and legislation. IRS has historically winked at Leftist PACs' creative uses of their donations. You Leftists have real convenient double standards...
http://calwatchdog.com/2013/08/26/ca-teachers-sue-union-over-political-use-of-dues/[/quote]
So it is only acceptable if your chosen master is your own benighted party. BTW, I have this bridge for sale...
quote=docwill]Your sanctimony would be more persuasive if the abuse-of-power weren't so blatant. IRS enforcement against misallocations of dues and donations is selectively enforced. Unions, esp. Gov't employees' unions, are notorious for diverting dues to political action. Dues-payors (mandated whether the worker chooses representation or not) have complained for decades that their money was supporting unwanted candidates and legislation. IRS has historically winked at Leftist PACs' creative uses of their donations. You Leftists have real convenient double standards...
http://calwatchdog.com/2013/08/26/ca-teachers-sue-union-over-political-use-of-dues/[/quote]
May 16, 2014 23:12:17 #
Mcjwells hit it right on the button. What you tea party conspirators don 't understand is the difference between exclusively primarily. The actually wording in the IRS tax code to qualify for. 501C4 is exclusively for social welfare programs. It actually says you will not qualify for 501C4 if you advertise against a politician you lose your 501C4 and that is what got Karl Rove in trouble with all his negative adds against democratic politicians so he lost his. 501C4 status and he started this conspiracy. I bet Fox didn't tell you that. But mcjwells great post
May 16, 2014 23:13:08 #
Quizzal
Loc: TN
Just think about it if there wasn't an IRS at all!! Sorry, can't think about the government people. I prefer to think about the general public in general. The whole stupid government needs to be totally redone. Yes, we do need a lot of people to represent all of us, but the current government is not working for any of US at all.
May 16, 2014 23:15:17 #
docwill wrote:
Your sanctimony would be more persuasive if the ab... (show quote)
What abuse and don 't quote Fox News.
May 16, 2014 23:52:10 #
tdsrnest wrote:
What abuse and don 't quote Fox News.
tdsrnest: Dick Chaney has a message for you too!
May 16, 2014 23:56:52 #
No IRS, no revenue, no government, no law- I don't know what you know about living in the American Narrative: the Wild West. Might makes right, vigilante law? You can have it as soon as Texas secedes.
Quizzal wrote:
Just think about it if there wasn't an IRS at all!! Sorry, can't think about the government people. I prefer to think about the general public in general. The whole stupid government needs to be totally redone. Yes, we do need a lot of people to represent all of us, but the current government is not working for any of US at all.
May 17, 2014 02:19:02 #
[/quote=tdsrnest]What abuse and don 't quote Fox News.[/quote]
Stay tuned to Matthews; he'll get to it...
Stay tuned to Matthews; he'll get to it...
May 17, 2014 02:37:26 #
soquote=Liberty Tree]LIsten to NPR for a few weeks and you will hear its pro left bias.[/quote]
Anymore they are so unlistenably Leftist (in that, oh so calming, neutral cadence) that playwright David Mamet tells the story of yelling, "Shutup! Shutup! Shutup!" at his car-radio while driving. Interestingly, after he went public with his Conservative 'conversion', he has received uniformly negative and snarky reviews from the NYT. Leftists are consistent; never settle for a cleanly dishonest review when personal invective and slander are so available....
Anymore they are so unlistenably Leftist (in that, oh so calming, neutral cadence) that playwright David Mamet tells the story of yelling, "Shutup! Shutup! Shutup!" at his car-radio while driving. Interestingly, after he went public with his Conservative 'conversion', he has received uniformly negative and snarky reviews from the NYT. Leftists are consistent; never settle for a cleanly dishonest review when personal invective and slander are so available....
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.