More Voter Fraud.
Seth wrote:
What about rummor, and who is Seamore? Did you mean Seymour, and if so, who is Seymour?
I think that is the GHOST that causes every SCREWUP for the LIBS, that they BLAME Conservatives for!!!
They would blame Conservatives if their cousin Irving in Madagascar had a hangnail.
Bebida wrote:
Do you agree that Since Trump ordered all rolls to be expunged of DEAD people and ones that have moved away, and they just did NOT do it, KNOWING that a LOT of people would send in all of them that came to them, is setting themselves up for a LOT of FRAUD? He gave them almost two YEARS to DO IT!!
FYI, no President can order states voting rolls to be "expunged". That is a states responsibility. However, there is a conservative organization named Judicial Watch that has sued several states and counties forcing them to purge their voting rolls of dead and other ineligible voters, LA county had approximately 1.5 million ineligible on their rolls. Judicial Watch threatened to sue and LA county entered into a court order agreement to voluntarily purge their rolls. That agreement was entered into in December 2019 and they still haven't completed the purge but they have started. Judicial Watch has done the same in N.C., KY, California and I think Iowa. It's not perfect but at least it's something!
Bebida wrote:
PERFECT NONCOMMITTAL LIBERAL ANSWER!!
If you say so, as I said, I am not a psychic and that is why I tend to NOT speculate on such risky gambles as betting on people taking such risks to try to sway an election especially since it won't work anyways. Do you REALLY think that once the fraud was discovered that it wouldn't be corrected for? No, I am not effected by your paranoid fears.
On timeon target wrote:
FYI, no President can order states voting rolls to be "expunged". That is a states responsibility. However, there is a conservative organization named Judicial Watch that has sued several states and counties forcing them to purge their voting rolls of dead and other ineligible voters, LA county had approximately 1.5 million ineligible on their rolls. Judicial Watch threatened to sue and LA county entered into a court order agreement to voluntarily purge their rolls. That agreement was entered into in December 2019 and they still haven't completed the purge but they have started. Judicial Watch has done the same in N.C., KY, California and I think Iowa. It's not perfect but at least it's something!
FYI, no President can order states voting rolls to... (
show quote)
The problem IS, they only START to expunge them. Then when noone is looking, they drop it. The Libs are not going to lose their ONLY advantage in any Election. To get them to FINISH expunging the rolls the Judicial Watch would have to stay on them 24/7!! And probably have to SUE them SEVERAL TIMES to get them completely expunged. I am reading a book by Tom Fitton, President of J.W.,about how the J.W. has to SUE the LIBS to get them to COMPLY with ANY "LAW". When they are ordered to turn over ANY documents, they drag their feet and J.W. has to take them to Court to GET IT!! They are ALL only ploys to COVER THEIR BUTTS, because they are as CORRUPT as ANYBODY ever has been!!
Seth wrote:
They would blame Conservatives if their cousin Irving in Madagascar had a hangnail.
EXACTLY!!!
One thing, if this Election puts Biden in office, I think WE the PEOPLE SHOULD PROTEST as LONG AND AS HARD AS WE CAN!! With ALL of the TENS OF THOUSANDS that attended ALL of Trump's rallies, and only a handful at ANY of Bidens, there is NO WAY Biden can win without MAJOR FRAUD!! And WE the PEOPLE should NOT STAND for IT!!!
This Country will not be worth SH-T, if the Libs get in again!!
Bebida wrote:
Maybe THAT is because California Gov. made it a LAW, in 2016, that a church CAN, with the Parishoner's permission, collect their Ballots, so they put up boxes to collect them. And in that Article, the Secretary of the State and the AG did NOT say they were illegal. They did not know. He said they COULD BE Illegal. He was going to "check on it"!! Which he SHOULD have done BEFORE he ever made the statement PUBLICLY!!
The CAGOP DID check it out BEFORE they put the boxes up. And they ARE LEGAL!! And they CHASTISED the AG and SOS for causing the stir when they did not know what they were talking about!!
Maybe THAT is because California Gov. made it a LA... (
show quote)
You may enjoy this article on over reach and an actual injunction now that Newsom can not make anymore EO ...
Gov. Gavin Newsom overstepped his executive authority when he issued an executive order in June specifying how counties should carry out a mostly vote-by-mail election, a Sutter County judge said in a preliminary decision on Monday.
The ruling will not affect the 2020 election, although it invalidates the election process executive order.
Judge Sarah Heckman wrote Newsom exceeded his authority and violated the separation of powers between the three branches of government when he issued Executive Order N-67-20 directing county election officials to take certain steps leading up to the general election. Newsomâs order cited the coronavirus outbreak as an emergency that warranted additional election protocol.
His order specified how many polling places and ballot drop boxes counties must have. An earlier executive order, N-64-20, required counties to send mail ballots to all registered voters.
Shortly after he issued the election orders, the Legislature passed two bills that effectively put his directives into law.
Republican Assemblymen James Gallagher of Yuba City and Kevin Kiley of Rocklin filed the lawsuit, contesting Newsomâs use of his powers.
The governor does not have the power or authority to assume the Legislatureâs role of creating legislative policy and enactments,â Heckman wrote in her opinion.
The court also prohibited Newsom from further exercising any power under the act which amends, alters or changes existing statutory law, or makes new statutory law or legislative policy.
Much more to it~~
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article246906342.html
Bebida wrote:
Just read another Article, Four Hundred Thousand cases of voter Fraud found ALREADY in the State of Calif. ALONE!! The states were ORDERED to EXPUNGE their Rolls of ALL OUTDATED Names on the rolls, and evidently they FAILED to DO THAT!! 400,000 cases of Ballots sent out to DEAD people, and people that no longer live there. Some up to 20 yrs. since they have moved away!! And THOSE are only the cases that have REPORTED them!! FOUR HUNDRED THOUSAND. That is almost ONE HALF MILLION.
I wonder HOW MANY that have NOT been reported will get sent anyway, by someone that just wants Biden to win
Just read another Article, Four Hundred Thousand c... (
show quote)
Ut oh same as 2016~~ Remember how Clinton supposedly won by 300,000 million?
Do you know Federal law requires timely purging of voters registries, yet the states fail to do them~~ So we know why donât we???..
Read pages 3-5 for federal requirement.. They donât enforce it either but certainly should be!! When it is not done we wind up with exactly what youâve discussed in your post here. So much for the protection of fair snd honest voting..
https://www.sos.ms.gov/links/elections/home/tab5/NVRAPurging.pdfMaybe we should file a class action lawsuit against the United States government for failing to enforce their fiduciary responsibility to all voters in the United States causing great harm and fraud. !!!
On timeon target wrote:
FYI, no President can order states voting rolls to be "expunged". That is a states responsibility. However, there is a conservative organization named Judicial Watch that has sued several states and counties forcing them to purge their voting rolls of dead and other ineligible voters, LA county had approximately 1.5 million ineligible on their rolls. Judicial Watch threatened to sue and LA county entered into a court order agreement to voluntarily purge their rolls. That agreement was entered into in December 2019 and they still haven't completed the purge but they have started. Judicial Watch has done the same in N.C., KY, California and I think Iowa. It's not perfect but at least it's something!
FYI, no President can order states voting rolls to... (
show quote)
The president doesnât have to order states to do it they are required by federal law to do it! Congress in other words...They know of the issue and do nothing about it... Accomplice to the fraudulent activities taking place because they fail to do what theyâre supposed to do to ensure our vote is our vote!! Iâd rather argue over impeachment proceedings against President Trump only to find out that was a coup set up by them!
Letâs file a class action lawsuit.âď¸đ
lindajoy wrote:
Ut oh same as 2016~~ Remember how Clinton supposedly won by 300,000 million?
Do you know Federal law requires timely purging of voters registries, yet the states fail to do them~~ So we know why donât we???..
Read pages 3-5 for federal requirement.. They donât enforce it either but certainly should be!! When it is not done we wind up with exactly what youâve discussed in your post here. So much for the protection of fair snd honest voting..
https://www.sos.ms.gov/links/elections/home/tab5/NVRAPurging.pdfMaybe we should file a class action lawsuit against the United States government for failing to enforce their fiduciary responsibility to all voters in the United States causing great harm and fraud. !!!
Ut oh same as 2016~~ Remember how Clinton supposed... (
show quote)
The Libs don't purge the rolls because they would NEVER WIN without all of the ILLEGAL VOTES!!! KUDOS to your INFO!! THANKS
When I said Trump ordered the states to purge their rolls, I guess I should have said Trump ordered the States to DO THEIR JOBS and purge the rolls of "ALL" dead people and move aways!!! BUT i guess one of these days we are going to finally REALIZE, that with the LIBS, if you have never HAD a REAL job in your LIFE, you would not be CAPABLE of DOING ONE!!!
lindajoy wrote:
You may enjoy this article on over reach and an actual injunction now that Newsom can not make anymore EO ...
Gov. Gavin Newsom overstepped his executive authority when he issued an executive order in June specifying how counties should carry out a mostly vote-by-mail election, a Sutter County judge said in a preliminary decision on Monday.
The ruling will not affect the 2020 election, although it invalidates the election process executive order.
Judge Sarah Heckman wrote Newsom exceeded his authority and violated the separation of powers between the three branches of government when he issued Executive Order N-67-20 directing county election officials to take certain steps leading up to the general election. Newsomâs order cited the coronavirus outbreak as an emergency that warranted additional election protocol.
His order specified how many polling places and ballot drop boxes counties must have. An earlier executive order, N-64-20, required counties to send mail ballots to all registered voters.
Shortly after he issued the election orders, the Legislature passed two bills that effectively put his directives into law.
Republican Assemblymen James Gallagher of Yuba City and Kevin Kiley of Rocklin filed the lawsuit, contesting Newsomâs use of his powers.
The governor does not have the power or authority to assume the Legislatureâs role of creating legislative policy and enactments,â Heckman wrote in her opinion.
The court also prohibited Newsom from further exercising any power under the act which amends, alters or changes existing statutory law, or makes new statutory law or legislative policy.
Much more to it~~
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article246906342.htmlYou may enjoy this article on over reach and an ac... (
show quote)
Aha!
This makes Gov Nuisance, whose job is to be conversant with the legalities before he issues an edict, a perfect example of the wannabe dictator certain feckless lefties are always accusing Trump of being.
-- "Well I'll be..."
Bebida wrote:
I think WE THE PEOPLE Need to take over doing jus... (
show quote)
This is another of many examples of why the founders didn't envision anyone making politics into a career field. I can't get into the minds of people long gone, but I believe that had they been given a glimpse into the modern political situation, they would have written term limits for the House and Senate into the Constitution.
Seth wrote:
This is another of many examples of why the founders didn't envision anyone making politics into a career field. I can't get into the minds of people long gone, but I believe that had they been given a glimpse into the modern political situation, they would have written term limits for the House and Senate into the Constitution.
I don't think it would have mattered. The POWER HUNGRY ones would have just changed the laws like they did. The ORIGINAL Law was that they would serve two years and go home. It SHOULD have STAYED that way!!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.