One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Main
WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT LAROUCHE?
Page <prev 2 of 2
May 9, 2014 12:42:53   #
oldladyfromwaco
 
stevenkalka wrote:
The late economist Michael Friedman proposed doing way with the Federal Reserve and just setting interest rates by formula with little discretion. Unfortunately, there were and are too many vested interests for that to ever happen.


http://www.aei-ideas.org/2013/01/milton-friedman-explains-why-the-federal-reserve-should-be-abolished/

http://www.econlib.org/library/Columns/y2006/Friedmantranscript.html

http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Milton_Friedman

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedman%27s_k-percent_rule
The late economist Michael Friedman proposed doing... (show quote)


You are right that it would be almost beyond a Herculean task to set up another banking system. And, if we did, I don't think Friedman's advice would be the most sound....somehow I don't trust him....or anyone we have to truly serve the people....so, I guess we're just stuck.

Reply
May 9, 2014 18:13:18   #
Homestead
 
oldladyfromwaco wrote:
I have watched LaRouche since I was young...LOL...long, long ago. At times, he seems like a crackpot. Other times, he makes sense.

The only reason I watch him is that he falls in line with what my very politically active mother told me when I was four years old....about the British Empire and the European bankers.....about "The Crown", most European bankers, the Federal Reserve, etc. and the influence on the world by these entities and people, such as the Rothschild's and their dynasty. Please tell me what you think....
_______________________________________________
This was sent to me by LaRouche Pac just a few minutes ago....

Lyndon LaRouche, in repeated statements yesterday during the weekly LaRouchePAC Policy Committee Show emphasized that the British Empire is attempting to manipulate the world into World War III and any lesser target for public outrage and action, such as British stooge Barack Obama or the Ukrainian crisis as such, is a grave strategic miscalculation. LaRouche called upon his associates and potential allies to expose the lying U.S. media, led by the New York Times and Washington Post, as nothing but propaganda tools for the British Empire’s war aims who are lying about the present international crisis – including war and destabilization efforts directed against China -- and its potential for World War III. He also urged those engaged in war avoidance to focus political efforts against the British Empire itself and to immediately impeach Obama. Without this British tool in the White House, the British war effort cannot succeed.

British Empire Directed Nazi Assault on Ukraine Escalates

The crisis situation in Ukraine dramatically escalated over the weekend with the massacre of nearly 50 anti-Kiev activists who were burned to death in a trade union building in Odessa by a Nazi mob. Following the massacre, swastikas were painted on the trade union building. Now, the Kiev government is sending Right Sector Nazis to Odessa to replace the regular police forces. Victoria Nuland, the advocate for Ukraine’s Nazis in the U.S. State Department who launched the British/Nazi coup in Ukraine, has utilized and continues to support protected British stay behind Nazi networks from World War II in Ukraine. At the same time, the proverbial City of London mouthpiece, The Economist attacked the “weak” Obama, as unwilling to fight for the West’s interests, a provocative line which has been echoed throughout the Western press.

LaRouche noted, “Talking against Obama and so forth, doesn’t do it for you. You have to take actions which eliminate his ability to control things. If you don’t do that, if you don’t fight war, you’re going to lose the war.” Similarly, “any press, any institution which will not defend the people of the United States and the interests of the United States, should suffer.”
I have watched LaRouche since I was young...LOL...... (show quote)


I went to a LaRouche meeting once, it was a mixed bag.
They understand the influence of the Global Bankers, but, for some reason they want to only focus on the influences surrounding the Queen of England.

The Global Bankers are the European Bankers that financed both sides of the Napoleon Wars, France verses England.

England is as much a victim of their plotting as any other country they've infiltrated. No doubt England is cow towing to their whims, but, the Global Bankers and their one world Order are much bigger than just England.

Then they said that they want to borrow money from the banks to dig canals from Alaska down to the desert states, to bring water down from the north, for irrigating for agriculture.

I could accept LaRouche getting things wrong about the Global Bankers, because, the bankers spend a lot of money on security to hide their activities from the public and are engaged in a lot of propaganda and miss information, so, I'm not sure anyone one really knows what their really doing other than an educated guess, that they are up to no good.

But, when they started talking about digging thousands of miles of canals to transport water......................................................And of course this would be over, around or through the Rocky Mountains.....................
well..............If I have to explain the ludicrously of it to you.......................

There's just no hope for you.

Reply
May 10, 2014 01:10:29   #
mpix Loc: NorCal
 
Brian Devon wrote:
*********
The Old Nazi lady from Waco is drawn to La Rouche because his anti-semitic diatribes match her views of the Jews. She also identifies with LaRouche because he is reviled as a bigot, has been thoroughly discredited and, like her, is quite a few bricks shy of a load.

If I ever met LaRouche or the old Nazi Waco lady, I would ask either of them, "What the hell did your parents do to you?"

The govt. of the U.K. has some rather strong views on good old Lyndon. He hates the Brits as much as he hates the Jews and also likes to make them the targets of his hate speech.

If you look up "bat shit crazy" you will find a picture of Lyndon LaRouche.
********* br The Old Nazi lady from Waco is drawn ... (show quote)


The true definition of " bat shit crazy" would be the old zombies Pelosi, Feinstein and Boxer. And the rest of you progressives. The dictionary you are using must be from Sweden. Your European Utopia, home away from home.

Reply
 
 
May 10, 2014 08:20:57   #
oldladyfromwaco
 
Homestead wrote:
I went to a LaRouche meeting once, it was a mixed bag.
They understand the influence of the Global Bankers, but, for some reason they want to only focus on the influences surrounding the Queen of England.

The Global Bankers are the European Bankers that financed both sides of the Napoleon Wars, France verses England.

England is as much a victim of their plotting as any other country they've infiltrated. No doubt England is cow towing to their whims, but, the Global Bankers and their one world Order are much bigger than just England.

Then they said that they want to borrow money from the banks to dig canals from Alaska down to the desert states, to bring water down from the north, for irrigating for agriculture.

I could accept LaRouche getting things wrong about the Global Bankers, because, the bankers spend a lot of money on security to hide their activities from the public and are engaged in a lot of propaganda and miss information, so, I'm not sure anyone one really knows what their really doing other than an educated guess, that they are up to no good.

But, when they started talking about digging thousands of miles of canals to transport water......................................................And of course this would be over, around or through the Rocky Mountains.....................
well..............If I have to explain the ludicrously of it to you.......................

There's just no hope for you.
I went to a LaRouche meeting once, it was a mixed... (show quote)


1. Agreed on their focus on the Queen. They seem to want to blame her, when in reality, it is The Crown, the 640 acre city within the city of London (with 57% ownership by the Rothschild dynast) that is the major culprit along with other original banking families including the Swiss. But, I am sure, being the Queen of England, she is not without influence.
2. Again, agreed about the financing of the wars. Did you know The Crown bailed out Britain when it was going bankrupt? Also, did you know The Crown (the Rothschilds) own the Bank of International Settlements, the International Monetary Fund, and all the Federal Reserves around the globe? They finance all wars, the military industrial complex, and all reconstructions. So, war is the most lucrative business on earth, and they love it....as you said....financing all participants.
(A note added is this....the final battle between France and England......Emil Rothschild had couriers that brought the "news" to the country of the result of the battle in 3 hours....that France had won. He bought up nearly all of the British financial district during the next 13 hours.....when the truth came out that Britain had actually won.The original Rothschild made this statement:
"I care not what puppet is placed upon the throne of England. The man who controls Britain’s money supply controls the British Empire, and I control the British money supply."

3. NOWAPA....the plan to bring water from the northwest was not a plan by LaRouche. It actually was promulgated by one of the universities in New Mexico. I'm not sure if it was the one in Roswell or Las Cruces. And, in the 60's it was actually given great consideration by the government. You question it? If billions of barrels of oil can be brought from Canada, why not water? If water flows from the Colorado to Los Angeles, why not from Alaska? His premise is that it would bring 7 million jobs to the US and Mexico (and prevent several million from coming to the US). That sounds like a winner to me. It would end any question of the US food supply (and Soros is buying all the Midwest farm land he can get his hands on), create jobs, and, perhaps, virtually end illegals coming to the US.
I do NOT know if it will work, but, having lived out there on a 187 section ranch we had.....with good soil, 14 inches of rainfall a year, and land so flat for irrigation that you can see 40 miles, it's seems better than no option at all. I am quite sure it will not take place in the near future. But in decades to come, it may become a necessity.....along with desalinization of ocean water and other options we consider foolish now....something like going to the moon was a hundred years ago.
Now, lest you think I'm a proponent of L....I watch EVERYONE, and attempt to glean truths and possibilities for the good of the nation. At this point in time, I've just about given up on even voting in the next election....and that would be the first time in my 71 years that I did not go to the poles. But, there is NO ONE I wish to vote for. There is NO ONE with allegiance to the country and the people.....but with plenty of allegiance to the corporations, bankers, Wall Street.....and their own remuneration and building of wealth. I just want my country back!

In line with my watching it ALL...instead of just one station, Jesse Ventura was on this morning showing his view of the Pentagon on 9-11. I'd probably vote for him before anyone else.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.