rafterman wrote:
I'm on the right and I watched it. I guess Swan didn't like the fact that President Trump is a realist and he definitely thinks positive thinking and having a positive outlook is something scornful - "Swan began by asking whether the president’s positive thinking had necessarily been the right approach to the coronavirus when the US death toll was now past 150,000 – and rising." The real point here is that Swannie was PREDISPOSED to disagree with anything and everything President Trump said. I knew it before the interview, President Trump did and his campaign advisers definitely knew it. What is he supposed to do - STOP - just because of some DISAGREEMENT with The Swannie Man. If President Trump stopped doing something because someone disagreed with him, he would have never sought the presidential nomination in the first place AND would have rolled over and never got the southern border wall built, or got the conversation going about stopping illegal immigration, or there would have been no tax reform, or there wouldn't be any regulation reform - (I could go on). But knowing the writer of this post, he will disagree with me. But that doesn't stop me from writing nor does The Swannie Boy disagreeing with him stop President Trump. I'm on the right - I watched this and I read it. I saw your post and I answered. Your move.
I'm on the right and I watched it. I guess Swan d... (
show quote)