moldyoldy wrote:
I see why you like trump, the same juvenile name calling.
Eric Holder was always beholden to the global laundromat dope banks...he gets impeached
and Holder and his lawfare firm Covington go right back to representing the laundromat banks
way to BLM, now we know that they're really about.
I feel so sorry for you lefties. Either you are that stupid of brain washed. All you can do is make up lies to call Trump. Have you noticed, he ignores all of the lies and name calling and just goes to work for the American people. It must really hurt you to see him keep succeeding and making the Dummycrats look so bad at the same time.
Lonewolf wrote:
Sounds like something trump and harvey Weinstein would do but I think they preferred them much younger like 13
Very clever to shift the focus off of the Black Lives Matter Leader. Never defend, always attack. Never explain, always accuse. Where did you hone your debating skills, K. Marx University ?
son of witless wrote:
Very clever to shift the focus off of the Black Lives Matter Leader. Never defend, always attack. Never explain, always accuse. Where did you hone your debating skills, K. Marx University ?
the post was from 2016, get over it. Obviously he was not found guilty, other wise he would be in jail.
son of witless wrote:
Very clever to shift the focus off of the Black Lives Matter Leader. Never defend, always attack. Never explain, always accuse. Where did you hone your debating skills, K. Marx University ?
He was not a leader and you right wing nuts had to go back four years to find something to complain about. Was there a conviction, or are you just trying to deflect from the disaster in the WH.
moldyoldy wrote:
He was not a leader and you right wing nuts had to go back four years to find something to complain about. Was there a conviction, or are you just trying to deflect from the disaster in the WH.
Atta boy moldy, keep defending terrorists.
byronglimish wrote:
Atta boy moldy, keep defending terrorists.
I am not defending trump and Putin.
moldyoldy wrote:
He was not a leader and you right wing nuts had to go back four years to find something to complain about. Was there a conviction, or are you just trying to deflect from the disaster in the WH.
What I find strange is that I cannot find any information as to a resolution. Was he found guilty or not guilty ? It might be nice to know. Perhaps you know since you jumped in.
son of witless wrote:
What I find strange is that I cannot find any information as to a resolution. Was he found guilty or not guilty ? It might be nice to know. Perhaps you know since you jumped in.
There is no info, maybe it was a setup that got exposed.
moldyoldy wrote:
There is no info, maybe it was a setup that got exposed.
You mean a coverup exposed. BLM support has big $$$.
moldyoldy wrote:
There is no info, maybe it was a setup that got exposed.
Perhaps. I assume he was not tried yet since there is no record. Perhaps the prosecutors dropped the case. If that happened some record of why should exist. Our legal system leaves a lot to be desired.
Lt. Rob Polans ret. wrote:
Want an example? Those inflations of numbers, pfffffffffffft. He signed an EO to bypass the CDC and send them to a task force.
Not to the task force. To Health and Human Services which the CDC falls under. The CDC has been having a lag of a week in reporting hospital data. A week can mean a big difference in decisions the task force has to make, or the role other agencies are obligated to perform. And earlier this week we find that the CDC cannot find weeks worth of hospital data which was submitted to them.
So HHS has a new system and database which the CDC, the task force, and other agencies will have access. When the raw data comes in, it will be immediately updated.
Not to mention, the term bypass is incorrect. Let me use an analogy. Suppose you offer some sort of youth after school program which is not a government program. Since I use to be a 4H leader, let me use that as the example. You want to have the information reach all the students in your local public school, and know a teacher who you've dealt with in the past. If the last time you gave that teacher the info to spread to the other teachers for their students, but this time the school asked you to give the info to the school administration for them to see every classroom and every student received the info; would you say the school administration had bypassed that teacher?
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.