fullspinzoo wrote:
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/07/the_real_blm.html
From the article:
"Was the owner threatened when asked to put that sign up? Or was it the owner's decision to put the sign up?"
"The person who showed up on the bakery doorstep with the sign has essentially demonstrated the thesis behind Black Lives Matter...."
So the author has no idea if the bakery owner put up the sign or not. And then proceeds to assume that someone forced the owner to put up that sign.
Typical fullspinzoo and American Thinker (as if 'thinking' is what this magazine engages in). Now let's see how many of the Amen crowd says 'right on', the author has a point.
working class stiff wrote:
From the article:
"Was the owner threatened when asked to put that sign up? Or was it the owner's decision to put the sign up?"
"The person who showed up on the bakery doorstep with the sign has essentially demonstrated the thesis behind Black Lives Matter...."
So the author has no idea if the bakery owner put up the sign or not. And then proceeds to assume that someone forced the owner to put up that sign.
Typical fullspinzoo and American Thinker (as if 'thinking' is what this magazine engages in). Now let's see how many of the Amen crowd says 'right on', the author has a point.
From the article: br br "Was the owner threa... (
show quote)
wcs: Go back to your semantics liberal think tank crowd! BLM is nothing but a Marxist hate group!
ldsuttonjr wrote:
wcs: Go back to your semantics liberal think tank crowd! BLM is nothing but a Marxist hate group!
One doesn't need 'semantics' to see the BS being thrown in this article. And I said nothing about BLM, real or otherwise. Irks you, doesn't it, when called on BS.
working class stiff wrote:
From the article:
"Was the owner threatened when asked to put that sign up? Or was it the owner's decision to put the sign up?"
"The person who showed up on the bakery doorstep with the sign has essentially demonstrated the thesis behind Black Lives Matter...."
So the author has no idea if the bakery owner put up the sign or not. And then proceeds to assume that someone forced the owner to put up that sign.
Typical fullspinzoo and American Thinker (as if 'thinking' is what this magazine engages in). Now let's see how many of the Amen crowd says 'right on', the author has a point.
From the article: br br "Was the owner threa... (
show quote)
What moves has BLM done to show productivity in America, except going out and looting, burning down businesses, and declaring they are going to 'burn down this system'? Are you really going to defend these Marxist/communist assholes? "Dismantling the nuclear family structure" is right in their platform.
fullspinzoo wrote:
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/07/the_real_blm.html
No one should be forced by threat, implied threat or coercion to use their business to support any political ideas not their own, and created by themselves. For all my life I have watched local Chicago businesses in Chicago put up Democrat signs in their windows and if not, windows were broken and business lost. Now it is BLM or fag flags and rainbow colors, etc. This is and always will be wrong. I personally boycott them and will continue to do so. I can't and won't get into anyone else's reasons for those signs. They have to do what they have to do, under threat or personal belief. I will do the same under personal belief. I just walked away from a friends house for a party on Independence Day weekend and his flying a fag flag instead of the usual American Flag. It is his house, it is his business. But inviting a nonpolitical organization there for that party and putting them under a flag that is not part of the organization, or everyone's personal beliefs, is wrong. No exceptions.
Logically Right
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.