Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone

He may have been uncomfortable because of the growing angry crowd.

Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone

There are three videos...and according to witness, he was uncooperative. One has to consider ALL evidence, to include sworn statements. Please do some research on your own.

Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall

I have been doing research...

The statement somehow takes precedence over reality?????

Did you watch the video?

Where was he uncooperative?

When he wouldn't stand up (hard to do when one is laying on the ground, cuffed, with a man kneeling on one's neck and another man holding one's legs...)???

Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone

I watched all three several times, without looking to find culpability.

This is the same old songs, stuck in a groove. No matter how many times people ask the same questions...the answer from me will not change unless there is NEW evidence, which is different than opinions.

In our legal system, the accusers must prove the case against the defendant. So, instead of asking where I see a failure of the law enforcement, try prosecuting your position. I have answered all questions, I have provided the officer's handbook, links to videos, diagrams....and the complaint. All of these sources support my position. To prosecute the position that the officer committed murder, evidence has to be more than preponderance of evidence. His accusers must show, he caused the death. His actions were dangerous. His actions demonstrated a depraved mind. He demonstrated lack of concern for human life.

For murder, the accuser must present evidence that is "beyond a reasonable doubt" must dispel any beliefs that the defendant did not do what he is accused of doing. This is the highest burden of proof. Criminal trials require the judge or jury to base convictions on evidence supporting guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

So, prosecute your case and I will respond...item by item. But, give evidence...not feelings or opinions based on the same tired BS...'his knee was on his throat', he was begging', he said he could not breathe, and so on. Evidence, he jumped up in down with glee when he learned Floyd died....that would be evidence of a depraved mind. Understands your assignment? Now is the time to ask for clarification.

Crayons Loc: St Jo, Texas

While all y'all argue over George Floyd 'the crackhead' diversion, There's a civil war goin on that
has been instigated by the 'home-grown-commie-leftists' and financed by the global Brussels banking crowd

'

Tug484

True

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

Reading the complaint is a starting point any good defense lawyer can Shred just by the recitation they, meaning all officers involved, have to attest to when death is involved...

They can also be altered to justify the means of the end result... I know I’ve read enough of them over the years and sat in many a conflicting deposition bearing out the “ inconsistencies” between recitations of what went down..Or, as it was perceived by each officer involved..

I’m not saying that is what occurred here but I am saying the other part just as important is what those other police officers said independently of one another and in writing...I want to see those, all of them as well...

GoCubs Loc: Earth

Give it up dude. You may as well be talking to a wall. Apparently, she has seen a video that the rest of us are not privy to.

Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall

If you watched it then you know that he wasn't defiant or aggressive towards the officers...

I am not certain that the officer is guilty of murder.... But he is being charged with it...

You brought up that there was a claim that the man was being uncooperative... Anyone can make a claim... Luckily there is video evidence that disproves that idea...

Understand that this thread is a discussion of what happened... Why continuously make false claims about what other members have stated?

To clarify....The officer was guilty of poor decisions and inappropriate actions that contributed to the death of a civilian... That is my opinion...

Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall

I dislike when my stance is falsely stated...

I am not an expert in these matters...

But the videos available and the information that has come out all appear to demonstrate that this was a failure on the part of the officers involved....

Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone

There are holes all through this and I am sure Stuart London is already sorting through the sworn testimony.

Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone

As short as I can say it....eyewitness sword depositions.

Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall

The eyewitness is going to stand there and claim what happened in the video didn't actually happen?

What is the difference between a sword deposition and a normal deposition? The search engine came up empty for the term...

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

Very true!!! And that information will shed additional facts or lies as they are evaluated..

The political pressure alone is going to make sure I’s are dotted and T’s crossed for sure..

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

Right about what? Anyone who believes Chauvin's actions played no role in Floyd's death ain't firing on all cylinders.

For how long now has the "white cop vs black suspect encounter" been under the microscope? Considering the unprecedented volatility of our political and cultural environment today and past experience with encounters such as this, seems to me that police officers everywhere should, by now, understand that failing to exercise proper restraint when dealing with a compliant suspect of a different race could easily inflame the racial divide.

And, lookee what happened. This makes the Rodney King riots look like a Boy Scout jamboree.

In this case, it is especially troubling to see cops treating a man suspected of committing a non-violent white collar crime and who was apparently drunk and compliant as if he had committed armed robbery. Appears to me Chauvin and his 3 comrades aren't too bright.

We will never know now whether or not Floyd knew the bill was counterfeit.