You say that Trump could do whatever he wanted to do at his presidential rallies in 2016 just because it was not a public venue, because Trump paid for the auditorium himself, and because attendees were to be there for him. Did that include encouraging his supporters to attack Anti-Trump demonstrators? No, because that's incitement to riot, which is a criminal act!

I guess you approve of the way Trump said he would pay the hospital bills for any of his friends or supporters who were hurt in these riots, but not one penny for opponents who were injured in the same riots.

You say Trump has never broken the Constitution. Oh no? Well I've got news for you -- Trump IS breaking the Constitution right now, by voter intimidation! He recently sent one of his "tweets" accusing the state of Michigan of "illegally" sending mail-in voting ballots to people. Oh sure, he changed his tweets later, saying that it was not voting ballots that were being mailed, but applications for the ballots, but he continued to use the lie that the applications were illegal, and threatened to cut off government aid to Michigan unless they put a stop to it. He made a similar threat against Nevada! In other words, he's trying to blackmail two states into doing his bidding by threatening them with dire consequences. That's practically extortion! Furthermore, by promoting the idea that mail-in ballots, as well as the applications for them are illegal, he is scaring potential voters into thinking that they'll be breaking the law by sending in their ballots, which means they won't vote at all, and if they don't vote, it means less votes for Joe Biden, and more for Trump! In other words, he's engaging in voter intimidation and voter fraud in order to ensure his reelection, which is not only illegal, but unconstitutional, because it's a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment guarantee of equal protection under the law, and a violation of the Fifteenth Amendment, which gives all citizens the right to vote.

So Trump hasn't broken the Constitution, huh? Not much he hasn't!

Vote by mail has been used in the case of military votes and absentee voting. This is a small amount of votes in any election. Because it is a small number of votes, it means that only a small percentage of those would be available for fraud. With a total vote by mail, that provides more opportunities for fraud. It doesn't necessarily mean there will be fraud, it's just provides more opportunities for fraud at a level that would change the outcome of an election just based on the volume of votes that could be tampered with. The states that have had total vote by mail, had years to set it up and work out the bugs by phasing it in slowly.
We could look at it another way, would you trust voting over the internet? Most people would say no because hackers could affect the outcome. Most couldn't say how it would be done, just that it could be done and it may be done by Russians, Chinese, Koreans or some other group. Even if it is done by Americans from any party or no party, it is still wrong.
Try to look at the scale of fraud. With physical in person voting with voter ID, it leaves almost zero margin for fraud. Without ID there is a small window for fraud. With mail voting, it increases the possible scale. With internet voting, the scale goes up astronomically where one person could overthrow the election results. With any voting system, the larger the number involved, the larger the effect.

Vote by mail has been used in the case of military votes and absentee voting. This is a small amount of votes in any election. Because it is a small number of votes, it means that only a small percentage of those would be available for fraud. With a total vote by mail, that provides more opportunities for fraud. It doesn't necessarily mean there will be fraud, it's just provides more opportunities for fraud at a level that would change the outcome of an election just based on the volume of votes that could be tampered with. The states that have had total vote by mail, had years to set it up and work out the bugs by phasing it in slowly.
We could look at it another way, would you trust voting over the internet? Most people would say no because hackers could affect the outcome. Most couldn't say how it would be done, just that it could be done and it may be done by Russians, Chinese, Koreans or some other group. Even if it is done by Americans from any party or no party, it is still wrong.
Try to look at the scale of fraud. With physical in person voting with voter ID, it leaves almost zero margin for fraud. Without ID there is a small window for fraud. With mail voting, it increases the possible scale. With internet voting, the scale goes up astronomically where one person could overthrow the election results. With any voting system, the larger the number involved, the larger the effect.